<Rachael> scribe: stevelee
<Rachael> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/coga/wiki/PlanningPage
<Rachael> steve: I am hoping to look at the overlaps next week but it overlaps with the work the editorial group is doing.
<Rachael> ...created a spreadsheet with suggested names. The requirement is that the names be in a certain grammatical style and a shorter length
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18gkODnzy_8BzZAieJ_IOQX1dmjcf9MZsC7vC9glKQvI/edit?usp=sharing
<Rachael> ...would appreciate comments.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18gkODnzy_8BzZAieJ_IOQX1dmjcf9MZsC7vC9glKQvI/edit?usp=sharing
<Rachael> Jennie: I don't have permission to view document
<Rachael> ...am able to access now.
<Rachael> Steve: Row 2 and 45 need more suggestions. Any with a yellow highlight need review.
<Rachael> Abi: Are yellow edited versions you want us to sign off on or need editing?
<Rachael> Steve: Yellow are items I've changed. If you think the new wording changes the meaning, please let me know.
<Rachael> Jennie: Editorial suggestion. So all group members are able to participate, would you mind adding a text indicator to rows with yellow for anyone who can't see color? Perhaps put in brackets before the title [changed]?
<Rachael> Rachael: All please review and provide comments by next week.
Abi, not had time, will look at in the next week
abi: is that adding illustration from Southampton Personas? Will talk ot EA
<Rachael> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/coga/wiki/PlanningPage
Justine: Speaking with lisa about
editing section of content usable or user research as can't do
both
... preference is section 6
Rachael: will check with lisa when she's back
jennie: recall we said would get feedback on process when document for but there's no action
<Roy> https://www.w3.org/TR/coga-usable/
<Rachael> Jennie: Would like to share content-usable and process for feedback at a meeting later today.
Racheal - now it is published we should be able ot share it
<Rachael> "To comment, file an issue in the W3C coga GitHub repository. If this is not feasible, send email to public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org (subscribe, archives). Comments are requested by 16 August 2019. In-progress updates to the document may be viewed in the publicly visible editors' draft."
Jennie - will share now
steve, roy, OK
Rachael, should we add an action for you sharing it your presentation
<Rachael> ACTION: Everyone share content-usable with key stakeholders to solicit feedback
<trackbot> Error finding 'Everyone'. You can review and register nicknames at <https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/coga/track/users>.
jennie: not specifcally but may be an action for everyone to share
<Jennie> +1
jennie: group of 5, one active.
working through the template for the SC
... working through bump is various documents. Will then post
to list before writing test procedure
<Rachael> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/11IKqjRFvkRd2dAfUiyc5whhB3yIYXvSiirWct7KQIB0/edit#gid=0
jennie: very happy to get feedack
https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/coga/wiki/WCAG_2.2_Success_Criteria_Groups
Rachael, recommend sending to WCAG group once draft test is written - (release early)
steve: John K created a draft - trying to arrange a meeting
Rachael, could we get a review to AG group in 2 weeks
stevelee, Rachael - yes
Rachael, I've bben leading on this. This has gone before AGWG - had lot of comments and we discussed here
Has evolved a little from most important thing. Defining important controls might be problem.
scribe: ie to define essential
jennie - provided some feedback to text
stevelee, should it be just be controls
<Rachael> steve: should this be scoped to controls? The pattern also includes important information.
<Rachael> rachael: Based on 2.1, we had split them apart.
<Rachael> steve: Should we compare SC and patterns?
Rachael, splitout controls as too hard
editor group will discuss duplicates, overlap etc
please join if you would like to.
Rachael, how is this process going for everyone - are there problems? any thoughts?
jennie: one thing is helpful to have a clear place to track ideas for other SCs/Patterns
steve: need somewhere to collect them
Rachael: how about the big resources spreadsheet
<Rachael> ACTION: Steve to add a tab for SC feedback chanels
<trackbot> Created ACTION-315 - Add a tab for sc feedback chanels [on Steve Lee - due 2019-07-25].
stevelee, yes, can add a tab
scribe: will add context to why it has arrisen not just the suggested title
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.154 of Date: 2018/09/25 16:35:56 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/feed/feedback/ Present: Jennie Rachael MichaelC stevelee Roy Regrets: John Rochford Kirkwood Found Scribe: stevelee Inferring ScribeNick: stevelee WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth Found Date: 18 Jul 2019 People with action items: content-usable everyone key share stakeholders steve with WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]