– DRAFT –
DXWG DCAT subgroup teleconference

<ncar_> meeting pwd pls!

<DaveBrowning> https://‌www.w3.org/‌2017/‌dxwg/‌wiki/‌Meetings:DCAT-Telecon2018.09.20

confirm agenda

+1

<riccardoAlbertoni> +1

<alejandra> +1

<ncar_> 0

<DaveBrowning> +1

Resolved: agenda confirmed

<arminhaller> +1

approve minutes of last meeting

<DaveBrowning> https://‌www.w3.org/‌2018/‌09/‌13-dxwgdcat-minutes

<riccardoAlbertoni> 0 (i was not present)

<ncar_> 0

+1

<arminhaller> 0 (wasn't present)

<alejandra> +1

<DaveBrowning> +1

Resolved: minutes of last meeting accepted

outstanding actions

<DaveBrowning> https://‌www.w3.org/‌2017/‌dxwg/‌track/‌actions/‌open

no ANdrea, no Makx

Jaro's open action https://‌www.w3.org/‌2017/‌dxwg/‌track/‌actions/‌143

<DaveBrowning> https://‌www.w3.org/‌2017/‌dxwg/‌track/‌actions/‌143

Jaroslav_Pullmann: unclear exactly what the issue is. hasRelation, hasPart logic? need more evidence ...
… some examples of _misuse_ of DCAT in European portal
… DaveBrowning and Jaroslav_Pullmann to make more explicit issue

ncar_: action-175 - move date back

DaveBrowning: action-184 underway

alejandra: links go to RDF landing page ... prefer to point inside document instead

DaveBrowning: has been trying to make document behave like DCAT-2014 doc - type definitions point to NS landing page (other links point inside document)

DaveBrowning: precedents are mixed across other W3C specs and the DCAT 2014
… proposes to open issue for which patterns to use going forward
… likes the prov-o pattern best

Action: DaveBrowning to open issue to fix pattern for links within rec document

<trackbot> Sorry, but no Tracker is associated with this channel.

DaveBrowning: action-186 and action-187 either complete or in progress

close action-217 and action-216

public comments

nothing

2PWD

<riccardoAlbertoni> no we can keep the issue and ask for external comment in the same issue thread

<DaveBrowning> https://‌github.com/‌w3c/‌dxwg/‌issues/‌251

https://‌rawgit.com/‌w3c/‌dxwg/‌dcat-alignments-schema/‌dcat/‌index.html#dcat-sdo

<alejandra> https://‌schema.org/‌Dataset

schema.org alignment

<alejandra> https://‌www.w3.org/‌wiki/‌WebSchemas/‌Datasets

<riccardoAlbertoni> +1 to include the simon's with the alejandra's additions in the 2PWD

alejandra: points out that an alignment from schema.org to early DCAT is available, and should be mentioned

SimonCox: do we need to have a vote in this meeting so we can send it to plenary next week

DaveBrowning: asking what process should be?

<riccardoAlbertoni> +1 to SimonCox ( we should not miss the opportunity for external comments on issues that are open)

<AndreaPerego> +1 to go ahead with the current DCAT to schema.org mappings

<alejandra> +1

<alejandra> we still need to look at all the other issues

SimonCox: the pink issue box says 'this is provisional' so we can accept it now and still change it later

Resolved: DCAT team agrees that current schema.org alignment (PR 354) should be merged, can still be changed later

<DaveBrowning> https://‌github.com/‌w3c/‌dxwg/‌issues/‌353

normative text in non-normative sections

DaveBrowning: suggest it should be part of an editorial sweep later

riccardoAlbertoni: suggests we comment clearly on normative status in preamble?

+1

<alejandra> +1

<Jaroslav_Pullmann> +1

<arminhaller> +1

<DaveBrowning> +1

Resolved: add a clearer explanation of normative statements in preamble

Action: DaveBrowning to add text about normative statements

<trackbot> Sorry, but no Tracker is associated with this channel.

<DaveBrowning> https://‌github.com/‌w3c/‌dxwg/‌issues/‌58

data quality model

DaveBrowning: text already added is great, and good for 2PWD

<alejandra> +1

DaveBrowning: but more work will be done, so issue 58 will stay open

+1

<riccardoAlbertoni> +1 ( we are encouraging comments on issue 58)

<DaveBrowning> https://‌github.com/‌w3c/‌dxwg/‌issues/‌313

<alejandra> already removed from the milestone

byteSize

superclass for dcat:Distribution

<riccardoAlbertoni> could external commentd help in solve contradictions? in that case i would add a comment...

SimonCox: conversation nowhere near done - leave open

<alejandra> https://‌github.com/‌w3c/‌dxwg/‌issues/‌317

remove from milestone

dereferenceable identifiers

DaveBrowning: not enough work yet, need story about versioning etc, too big to resolve now, remove from milestone

<DaveBrowning> https://‌github.com/‌w3c/‌dxwg/‌issues/‌53

<alejandra> +1

<Jaroslav_Pullmann> +1

project context

DaveBrowning: good work done, more needed, good for 2PWD, but further work will be added later

Links to DCAT 2014 RDF

DaveBrowning: DSR is comfortable with DaveBrowning proposal - links from NS page can point to updated RDF representation
… NS page needs TLC, with links to RDF for DCAT-rev
… matches W3C policy for namespace pages
… i.e. links from NS page to different versions of RDF files
… will be executed as part of 2PWD release

rootResource/manifest

DaveBrowning: no love recently ... remove from milestone

Distros in zip files

DaveBrowning: much discussion in June, but no resolution, so not ready for 2PWD

<riccardoAlbertoni> yes we should have a resolution ...

proposed: congratulations to DCAT team for working efficiently to 2PWD

+1

<riccardoAlbertoni> +1

<arminhaller> +1

<AndreaPerego> +1

<DaveBrowning> +1

<Jaroslav_Pullmann> +1

<alejandra> +1

Resolved: congratulations to DCAT team for working efficiently to 2PWD

<riccardoAlbertoni> bye !

<AndreaPerego> Bye!