– DRAFT –
Dataset Exchange Working Group Teleconference

I can do it

scribenick annette_g

<SimonCox> +1

<PWinstanley> https://‌www.w3.org/‌2018/‌03/‌20-dxwg-minutes

PROPOSED: approve March 20 minutes

<AndreaPerego> +1

<PWinstanley> +1

+1

<Jaroslav_Pullmann> +1

<kcoyle> 0

<DaveBrowning> 0 (not present)

Resolved: approve March 20 minutes

<PWinstanley> https://‌www.w3.org/‌2017/‌dxwg/‌wiki/‌F2f3

PWinstanley: we've been talking about the next F2F meeting.

F2F3

there are a couple of issues. First is that we won't be able to find a date that works for everyone.

Secondly, meeting in the far east seems like an option that won't work for most people. So it looks like we're tied to a meeting in Europe.

We need to consider availability of key people in the subgroups, like Alejandra and Simon.

That suggests May 7 as the one workable date.

SimonCox: I'm willing to hang around late for telecons.

PWinstanley: it looks like the week of May 7. But we have to commit to starting very early, so there's a good period of time that Simon and Rob and Nick can manage.

Do people agree with the reasoning for that? Are we happy to start looking for week of May 7?

It's time for people to start coming forward with firm proposals.

kcoyle: we never did get any commitment from Rob, so I may send him an email.

but we should go ahead anyway.

PWinstanley: I agree

PWinstanley: can we put an action of people who have offered a venue in may to come forward with a proposal?

I think we have Jaro, maybe Riccardo, maybe me (PWinstanley)

By next week, we need firm proposals so that we can make decisions.

we need a good internet connection, 2 days, possibly 3 for flexibility.

SimonCox: 2 days spread over 3 calendar days works well

Jaroslav_Pullmann: is this about address, or availability of venue?

<SimonCox> I recommend someone making sure they bring one of these https://‌www.jabra.com.au/‌business/‌speakerphones/‌jabra-speak-series/‌jabra-speak-510

PWinstanley: what we're looking for is an address and the availability of the venue.

Jaroslav_Pullmann: how many people?

kcoyle: 12 people responded, so 12-15 is probably fine.

Action: kcoyle to put out an email about F2F venue

<trackbot> Created ACTION-97 - Put out an email about f2f venue [on Karen Coyle - due 2018-04-03].

Jaroslav_Pullmann: those proposing should clarify availability, transportation, address

PWinstanley: The next item is open action items.

Open action items

<PWinstanley> https://‌www.w3.org/‌2017/‌dxwg/‌track/‌actions/‌open

<SimonCox> present?

PWinstanley: Karen's one before today can be considered complete, and Dave's is still to be done.

<AndreaPerego> https://‌github.com/‌w3c/‌dxwg/‌issues/‌160

PWinstanley: 85 and 86 are AndreaPerego

AndreaPerego: the one on access rights is in github

the other one is very much related to the previous.

PWinstanley: we keep both of those open

PWinstanley: anybody know about 88?

96?

Jaroslav_Pullmann: there was a good discussion on the use case with reference to real world entities. I propose to leave it open. I will wait for all the comments. It's in a feature branch. I will merge in all the comments received in the past week.

PWinstanley: UCR additional use case on real-world objects - is that still in progress?

Jaroslav_Pullmann: yes. It is in need of discussion in the documentation at least.

still in progress

DCAT subgroup report

PWinstanley: DCAT subgroup report

SimonCox: we have a meeting tomorrow morning. we propose to move the editor's draft to this group to approve.

we are primarily making sure the doc contains links, placeholders, etc where changes will be made.

Last meeting we were able to close some issues related to relaxing domain and range of DCAT properties.

We're trying to start using the wiki as a place to develop proposals.

<SimonCox> Github wiki https://‌github.com/‌w3c/‌dxwg/‌wiki

kcoyle: I have sent a note to Dave Raggett letting him know that the FPWD is coming up shortly, possibly next week or the week after.

SimonCox: we were planning to have a vote in the subgroup to publish next week.

PWinstanley: the wiki is looking sharp

SimonCox: I'm trying not to be the only person working on it, so creating places where others can help.

There's a bunch of spaces where there's one line holding a place for others to contribute.

it turned out people were not using the branching in the documents, so we're using the wiki.

kcoyle: how do we use that wiki on github?

SimonCox: from the link above, look at the app profiles page. You should see buttons at the top, edit, etc.

the pages are done in markdown.

The one slight complication, the catalog data services page, the images are done by references, not attachments.

conneg

PWinstanley: does anybody know anything about the subgroup?

silence ensues

PWinstanley: we'll have to pick that up with Lars

anything else?

all is quiet

Ixchel: I have a question: I emailed ostein.

PWinstanley: can we push this to the next meeting?

Ixchel: okay

PWinstanley: thanks, all! watch out for Karen's email for those offering a place for the F2F week of May 7. Everyone else, mark your calendars.

<AndreaPerego> Bye!

<Jaroslav_Pullmann> bye!

bye, folks!