– DRAFT –
Dataset Exchange Working Group Teleconference

approve minutes of previous meeting

<SimonCox> https://‌www.w3.org/‌2018/‌02/‌27-dxwg-minutes

<SimonCox> +1

+1

<roba> I have a tweaked version of UC for discussion https://‌github.com/‌w3c/‌dxwg/‌issues/‌145

<alejandra> 0 (wasn't present)

<DaveBrowning> +1

Resolved: accept minutes of previous meeting

open action items

<kcoyle> https://‌www.w3.org/‌2017/‌dxwg/‌track/‌actions/‌open

kcoyle has marked DCAT action items as such

action items 81 - 86

roba will post information about Action Item 82

this plenary v. DCAT WG and other WGs

kcoyle: would it be best to have fewer plenary meetings to allow other people meeting in other groups more time? Should we have a less frequenet regular schedule

<roba> +1 for every 2 weeks

<SimonCox> +1

<antoine> sounds good

<alejandra> +1 for every 2 weeks

<Jaroslav_Pullmann> +1 for regular schedule, less often

<DaveBrowning> +1 for every two weeks

<roba> * logistica arythmica

+1 for every two weeks

<PWinstanley> +1 for every 2 weeks

<roba> subgroup or via chair?

PWinstanley: subgroups should be able to call a plenary meeting

<AndreaPerego> +1, so we should keep this timeslot "booked" in case we may need to have additional, ad-hoc, meetings, in case a decision from the plenary is needed

kcoyle: can we resolve things over mail, not just plenary

<roba> q

roba: out-of-sync plenary meetings to be coordinated via the chair

alejandra: please advertise all meetings (subgroups) through the mailing list

<roba> https://‌www.w3.org/‌2018/‌02/‌20-dxwg-minutes

<roba> * sorry ignore that

kcoyle: W3C rules are that meeting agenda are presented 24hrs before meeting

<roba> q

+1

<antoine> +1

(q+ rob)

<SimonCox> https://‌www.w3.org/‌2018/‌Process-20180201/#GeneralMeetings

<AndreaPerego> :)

roba: there was an issue with the last profile meeting minutes- they have been generated incorrectly, will investigate

<alejandra> Are you saying that the minutes listed here: https://‌www.w3.org/‌2017/‌dxwg/‌wiki/‌Meetings ?

<alejandra> I don't see them

Action: roba to investigate profile meeting minutes generation issue due 2018-03-14

<trackbot> Created ACTION-88 - Investigate profile meeting minutes generation issue due 2018-03-14 [on Rob Atkinson - due 2018-03-13].

<AndreaPerego> @roba, in case you still have the minutes log, they could be posted to the mailing list, and then pointed to from the relevant meeting page in the wiki.

daylight savings time. this confuses plenary schedule changes

<SimonCox> I set up this poll for the DCAT sub-group https://‌doodle.com/‌poll/‌cvuzxnqan8s8utbc#table

kcoyle: SimonCox has a proposal for daylight savings time changes

SimonCox: we need to change times due to a 2 hours difference shift between northern and southern hemisphere
… in 4 weeks time

SimonCox: seems impossible to proposa a convenient time for Europe, Australia & USA

SimonCox: no American participants in DCAT group thus simpler to schedule but must be careful not to exclude people from the Americas

SimonCox: Doodle polls represent options in people's local times

<PWinstanley> 25 March I think is start

Use Cases and Requirements

<roba> https://‌github.com/‌w3c/‌dxwg/‌issues/‌145

roba: has a proposed new Use Case

<AndreaPerego> Does this relate to UCRs concerning service- / API-based data access?

AndreaPerego: In DCAT-AP you can specify that a distribution is of dct:type "service". In this case, using dcat:accessURL means that your pointing to the general service interface. Could this be an option?

<Jaroslav_Pullmann> The issue may relate to (distinguishing) a packaged Distribution: https://‌www.w3.org/‌TR/‌dcat-ucr/#ID1 ?

<antoine> http://‌linkeddatafragments.org/‌concept/

<AndreaPerego> Can this work also with non-RDF data?

<roba> yes

<kcoyle> PROPOSED: accept use case 145 (with relaxing of specifics as Rob has described)

<DaveBrowning> +1

<PWinstanley> 0

<roba> (the linked data fragments may be RDF specific though)

<roba> +1

+1

<AndreaPerego> +1

<alejandra> +1

<Jaroslav_Pullmann> 0, propose to elaborate a bit more (e.g. relations to othe requierements)

<SimonCox> +1

<antoine> 0 but probably tending towards +1 if I think a bit more ;-)

<AndreaPerego> +1 to Jaroslav_Pullmann's point - linking to related UCRs

Resolved: accept proposed UC 145, with revisions

Action: roba to refine the Use Case with better integration

<trackbot> Created ACTION-89 - Refine the use case with better integration [on Rob Atkinson - due 2018-03-13].

SimonCox: explains the current practice around creating Issues in GitHub

SimonCox: the only issue tag that needs special treatment is "Requirement"

<roba> OK - update UCR, update issue title and tag with requirement...

<roba> i think morph to a requirement is fine, editing into UCR with related UC and links to ldfragments is the process..

<Jaroslav_Pullmann> There was a response to UCR WD comment request a week ago, should we discuss shortly?

<Jaroslav_Pullmann> https://‌lists.w3.org/‌Archives/‌Public/‌public-dxwg-comments/‌2018Feb/‌0001.html

responses to our UCR document

<alejandra> I suggested that it might be useful to separate issues between use case and requirements, to allow to link clearly to other requirements

<roba> https://‌github.com/‌w3c/‌dxwg/‌blob/‌roba-profile/‌dcat/‌rdf/‌profile.ttl

Action: Jaroslav_Pullmann to respond to ISO 15926 commentators on UCR

<trackbot> Error creating an ACTION: could not connect to Tracker. Please mail <sysreq@w3.org> with details about what happened.

Action: kcoyle to arrange poll for new plenary time

<trackbot> Created ACTION-91 - Arrange poll for new plenary time [on Karen Coyle - due 2018-03-13].

<AndreaPerego> Thanks, and bye!

<Jaroslav_Pullmann> bye!