See also: IRC log
clear agenda
<scribe> scribe: jeanne
Shawn: This is a draft our of
TPAC presentation to the Accessibility Guidelines Working
Group
... we are also doing a presentation for the Meetup, but that
is not this presentation
... this is a recap to the WG, who may not have read our
updates or forgotten them in the rush to work on 2.1
... last year at TPAC, the AGWG decided which proposal for
developing SIlver that we should follow.
... I think the Stakeholder slide is too detailed
Jeanne: Showing that we have broad input is important in W3C process
<jemma> I put sub topics for literature review slide.
<jemma> basic idea for literature review slide is why, how, what
Jeanne: I want a slide on presentations and public outreach
Shawn: We haven't done that many,
but lets think about what could be on the slide and decide
later
... The research project was originally scheduled to take 6
months and we are already past that. We need to speak to
that.
... I'm making a slide with a visual timeline to replace the
WCAG timeline, which the AGWG is already known.
... since some of the phases are quite short, we want to show
that visually, so people don't think this is a 5-year
project.
... also some of the phases are overlapped, so a diagram would
show that better.
Jemma: INterpretation date should include Q1
Jeanne: We want to show the AGWG that we are doing a lot to involve research
Shawn: When we presented to the
AGWG at TPAC 2016, they wanted to see research-driven
decisions. It will be important to them to see that there is
progress
... Discovery and Interpretation will be an on-going
process
... we want to emphasize the change in structure
... This is important to communicate to the AGWG that success
criteria that can't make it into 2.1 will not be punted to
Silver as a magic bullet.
... We want to emphasize to the AGWG that we need their
expertise in the future
... we also want to be clear that we are aware of 2.1 and that
we are focused on Silver.
Jemma: Just one slide for Stakeholder Map
Shawn: Maybe just use the snippet
of the spreadsheet
... 40+ roles and cross reference to different maps
Jeanne: I'm good with that, the AGWG is sophisticated and would be more interested in the details. I have had outside interest in the Stakeholder Map. We should consider polishing it up and publishing it as a Note.
Jeanne: I have an action item to create the document to send to the Interviewees that includes the Consent section and the interview questions. I didn't do it because of some file corruption problems.
Shawn: I will send the email with the Consent and questions
Jemma: I will miss both days next week
Shawn: I am traveling next week. I may attend Tuesday, but I will not attend on Friday.
Jemma: What will I miss next week?
Jeanne: I think we should start working on our analysis of Pete's raw research results, so we can report on them for TPAC.
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.152 of Date: 2017/02/06 11:04:15 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/[fixing files]// Succeeded: s/Aaccessibility G uidelines/Accessibility Guidelines/ Present: Shawn Josie Jeanne jemma Regrets: Jennison Jan Found Scribe: jeanne Inferring ScribeNick: jeanne Found Date: 20 Oct 2017 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2017/10/20-silver-minutes.html People with action items:[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]