See also: IRC log
<lisa> Other ideas: Do we want it as a vocabulary? should we trim the specification?
<Thaddeus> +Present Thaddeus
<Thaddeus> + Thaddeus
<Thaddeus> can someone post the call in number please
<lisa> scribe: andyheath
<lisa> thad can you access this page https://www.w3.org/2017/08/telecon-info_personalization
<lisa> regrets, jan
Texthelp will be joining when they get through the process things
<clapierre> scribe: AndyHeath
If you want to add more pages/links on the wiki you can
<lisa> https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/wiki/Task-list-for-semantics
<Thaddeus> I cant get in to the right now
<Thaddeus> https://www.w3.org/2017/08/telecon-info_personalization
On the semantics page we are collecting sub-issues
<Thaddeus> are you allowed to paste in the number
Collect comments when reviewing documents in this place
<lisa> Thad, i opened a private chat window
<clapierre> https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/wiki/Task-list-for-semantics
<lisa> thadd i put the info into a privat chat
The semantics page is stuff for the documents and a todo list
<lisa> https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/wiki/Task-list-for-semantics
<lisa> https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/wiki/
Can we get a straw draft out for early December to be useful for WCAG 2.1
Janina - why are we on a WCAG timeeline at all given that ARIA ia all about tecnniques
Lisa - the more supportive techniques the better and we have some
Lisa - there is already a draft of our techniques
Andy agrees with Janina too
Michael agrees with Janina
Lisa/Gregg - ARIA is limited to markup languages
Debate about whether there are sufficeint techniques
<Zakim> janina, you wanted to ask for some more about what the wcag 2.1 tie in is
There isn’t agreement on whether we care about the WCAG 2.1 schedule
Gregg - its too late
<lisa> https://w3c.github.io/personalization-semantics/
Lisa - do we want 2pwd for 5th december
Janina - updating the draft by 5th december but focussing on wcag may not be the way to go
Lisa and Charles wants us to meet every week
For now one call per week in the cuyrrent timeslot
<Thaddeus> I am fine joining a weekly meeting
Gregg - wcag used surveys and the meetings followed to resolve unresolved things
Jason - what are the objectives for a specification ?
Jason - do we want it tight and small or larger and take longer to progress
<clapierre> +1 to weekly meetings unless cancelled
<lisa> +1 to weekly meetings unless cancelled
Lisa - “I would like a weekly call supplemented by surveys where useful”
<clapierre> +1 to using surveys
<Thaddeus> +1 to using surveys
+1 for weekly call + surveys
Gregg - “surveys - make sure that links always open up on a new page"
Charles “TPAC - I’ll be there for the week. Digital Publishing Monday and Tuesday,Thurs and Fri = publisjing summit”
<Thaddeus> I will be
Discussion - how/whether to have a meeting at TPAC on personalisation
Janina - propose talk some personalisation in joint meeting for ARIA and CSS Media Queries sometime on Minday or Tues.
Lisa +1 for pesonalisation in joint meeting + should meet with dig pub
Charles - will propose jont meeting to dig pub
Janina - meet with CSS best Mon or Tues
Lisa, Charles, Janina take this offline
<lisa> ACTION: charles sort out tpac [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2017/10/02-personalization-minutes.html#action01]
Lisa = “its a long spec and people more familiar with the metadata side
Lisa - |lets try to focus effort on things people are implementing while not throwing stuff out"
Lisa - “want more use cases but for a narrower scope”
Lisa/Charles - don’t throw anything out
First agenda # for next week - discussion of potential restructuring of spec
Jason - “conventional way to think about it is start with preferences”
Jason - “but its not clear how all the pieces of this can fit together”
ack
Lisa - “architecture coming second"
<Thaddeus> agreed
<Thaddeus> thank you
Lisa - “we can make a wiki page where we discuss the architectural issues"
<lisa> ACTION: lisa to make page on actectures [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2017/10/02-personalization-minutes.html#action02]
Everyone please look at the specirication
should some things be considered “at risk"
Please add to the wiki pages
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.152 of Date: 2017/02/06 11:04:15 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/emantics/semantics/ Present: jasonjgw lisa AndyHeath clapierre janina Thaddeus GreggVan MichaelC Regrets: jan Found Scribe: andyheath Inferring ScribeNick: AndyHeath Found Scribe: AndyHeath Inferring ScribeNick: AndyHeath WARNING: No meeting title found! You should specify the meeting title like this: <dbooth> Meeting: Weekly Baking Club Meeting WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth Got date from IRC log name: 02 Oct 2017 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2017/10/02-personalization-minutes.html People with action items: charles lisa WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]