See also: IRC log
<scribe> Scribe: Ian
present?
IJ: I hope to do the transition
request tomorrow. Awaiting editor final signal
... stay tuned for email re: change in CR exit criteria
Our current charter => http://www.w3.org/Payments/WG/charter-201510.html
nicktr: the charter establishes
our scope
... it's our "license to operate"
... our charter expires 31 December
... we first met in Nov 2015 ... so TPAC 2017 will represent
the 2-year mark, and when we need to recharter
... it would be cool to go into TPAC with a draft
... the Members review the charter and we will want to
socialize to get their support
<nicktr> ian: there are some strategic options
<nicktr> ...we could be underway with our review before the end of October
<nicktr> ...alternatively we use TPAC to hammer out issues within the group
<nicktr> ...so I suggest we keep both options open
Nick: Any questions on the recharter process?
[No replies]
Nick: Some things to think about for recharter are in the agenda
Things to do:
* Continue work with revised milestones
* PR API, PMI, Payment method manifest, Payment Handler, payment method specs
<scribe> New things (potentially):
<scribe> * New payment method specs (e.g., ILP)
* Curation and governance of network name list, etc.
* Version 2 features for PR API
Question: Should we revisit non-interactive (out-of-browser) payments?
scribe: e.g., for IOT
Ken: How would you see us
articulating the relationship between the WG and IG?
... Regarding continuing work, should we be specific or
generally say "we will continue"
NickTR: I think the more specific
we can be the easier it will be to get the charter through the
membership review
... open charters raise issues for some members (e.g., due to
patent concerns)
... in terms of the IG and the WG, good question!
... the relationship between IG and WG was strong initially but
is no longer as strong
<nicktr> Ian: there have been staff discussions recently
<nicktr> ...IG is an industry monitoring grou
<nicktr> ...IG could do analysis of needs and produce whitepaper explaining state of the world
<nicktr> ...over time IG continues to monitor and the working group
<nicktr> ...IG could review specs and critique WG's response to needs/market
<nicktr> ...in short IG becomes more like a "steering committee" which is distinct from the WG's implementation and technology focus
nicktr: I welcome more
suggestions from the wider group on what we should do
... I encourage you to add your suggestions and
thoughts
<scribe> ACTION: Ian to create a GitHub thingy for the charter and people can make comments with issues and pull requests [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2017/09/07-wpwg-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> 'Ian' is an ambiguous username. Please try a different identifier, such as family name or username (e.g., IFSF-EFT-WG-Lead, ijacobs, ijmad).
<nicktr> current charterhttps://www.w3.org/2015/10/payments-wg-charter.html
Just Released: W3C Web Payments Polyfill and Demo (video)
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-payments-wg/2017Sep/0007.html
Nick: This is really exciting and, I hope, bring the work to a broader audience
https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/wiki/FTF-Nov2017
Please register if you have not done so
<nicktr> ian: we might want to meet with the web authentication group
<nicktr> ...at TPAC
<nicktr> ...Manash has said he'd like to talk about 3DS 2.0
<deganon> +1
<nicktr> ...if there are other groups then please let us know
<mweksler> +1 on the joint meeting with webauth
Proposed: 21 September
<scribe> ACTION: Nick to work with Adrian and Ian to draft a WG Charter [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2017/09/07-wpwg-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-65 - Work with adrian and ian to draft a wg charter [on Nick Telford-Reed - due 2017-09-14].
IJ: Should that be available before 21 Sep?
Nicktr: Yes...so let's have the draft charter by 21 Sep
<Ken> +1
Ian: I see Webkit now in
development
... that means all browsers are implementing
... congratulations