W3C

DXWG Weekly Telco

19 June 2017

Meeting Minutes

<Caroline_> https://‌www.w3.org/‌2017/‌06/‌12-dxwg-minutes

+1

<Jaroslav_Pullmann> +1

<erics> +0 wasn't here

<newton> +1

<Caroline_> +1

Resolved: accepted minutes

kcoyle; Three sub-groups - Use Cases, DCAT, application profile

Ixchecl_F: updated Use Case template
… question - separating out identification of stakeholders
… proposes to carry out - no objections heard

<Caroline_> roba: some of the use cases we haven't had the chance to discuss yet

<Jaroslav_Pullmann> https://‌docs.google.com/‌document/‌d/‌1z8UVjMEPoqp69ZHXk6asY6tCHHECglk4-3Lznd5dxS0/‌edit#heading=h.cmfhj7ago0ev

roba: Generalised versions of Use Cases ID4 and ID6

kcoyle: can we make a link from wiki - needs to be publicly visible

<kcoyle> https://‌www.w3.org/‌2017/‌dxwg/‌wiki/‌Use_Case_Working_Space#Data_Quality_Vocabulary_.28DQV.29_Wish_List_left_by_the_DWBP_WG

kcoyle: some Use Cases have multiple Use Cases implied - can these be teased out?

<kcoyle> roba: link could be to use case document or add new use cases, or edit use cases as provided

<kcoyle> roba: or new document for agreed use cases

Jaroslav_Pullmann: not planning to rewrite raw inputs

kcoyle: consolidated document needs to be on github
… single place to do that

proposed consolidated use cases for voting on?

kcoyle: F2F focus on consolidating Use Cases
… high priority

Caroline_: migrate to github with tracking ?

+1 to consolidate - but how to promote consolidated versions over "raw inputs?"

Happy to move generalised and voted-on cases to a new wiki page

<Caroline_> roba: propose to create another wiki page with the use cases

<Caroline_> ... the ones that are being discussed and voted by the group

Jaroslav_Pullmann: use status tags?

<Caroline_> roba: I prefer to consolidate the agreed versions in one place

<erics> Could it be SumitPurohit?

<erics> Hi Sumit :-)

<SumitPurohit> Hi Everyone :-)

<Caroline_> https://‌www.w3.org/‌2017/‌dxwg/‌wiki/‌Use_Case_Working_Space#Modeling_agent_roles

<kcoyle> We don't at this time have a place for comments on use cases, although that would be a good idea

<kcoyle> roba: need to cover common cases; using blank nodes are hard to query against

<kcoyle> ... but need to weigh flexibility

<kcoyle> ... this is something we can use in other use cases where there is a general need and some people need something special

<kcoyle> +1

Jaroslav_Pullmann: supports minimal set of common properties - but problem is the many forms this takes - is it a case for application profiles

kcoyle: need a straw man proposal for the simple common agent roles.

roba: defining roles a solution issue no t a UC responsibility

<Caroline_> https://‌www.w3.org/‌2017/‌dxwg/‌wiki/‌Use_Case_Working_Space#Modeling_agent_roles

PROPOSAL: Accept UC ID13 with edits to address the commonality of the pattern of common properties and detailed descriptions in profiles, and the need to agree a list of roles in the specificaton process

<kcoyle> PROPOSAL: Accept UC ID13 with requirement to create an agreed list of roles for DCAT with the remainder for profiles

roba: lost issue of using a common mechanism for simple/extended definitions
… add as requirement?

kcoyle: perhaps a new Use Case as a placeholder

<kcoyle> +1

+1

<antoine> +1

<Caroline_> +1

<Jaroslav_Pullmann> +1

<newton> +1

<nandana> +1

<mathieu> +1

<SumitPurohit> +1

<DavidBrowning> +1

<erics> +1

<present__Ixchel_F_> +1

<PWinstanley> +1

Resolved: Accept UC ID13 with requirement to create an agreed list of roles for DCAT with the remainder for profiles

roba: how do we review edits? I will copy to consolidated UC doc -

<Caroline_> https://‌www.w3.org/‌2017/‌dxwg/‌wiki/‌Use_Case_Working_Space#Modeling_funding_sources

Caroline_: we will then vote at next meeting if necessary

antoine: please send a email to the group when new edited version published.

is this more a job for a specialised vocabulary?

Jaroslav_Pullmann: sub-use case of agent role

<kcoyle> good catch!

PWinstanley: agree - need opportunity for hierarchy of agents
… needs a controlled list - authority list

<PWinstanley> +1 to Antoine's comment

antoine: not a hierarchy of types of agents, but one of roles

kcoyle: great deal of information about a funding source
… therefore about the role, not the funding information

<kcoyle> roba: detail of funding role is not limited to DCAT - could be specialized vocabulary

<Caroline_> roba: funding role is not limited to DCAT

<kcoyle> ... trick here is to have extension point in profiles

<Caroline_> Me ID31

<Caroline_> https://‌www.w3.org/‌2017/‌dxwg/‌wiki/‌Use_Case_Working_Space#Modeling_funding_sources

<Caroline_> the first was ID13 https://‌www.w3.org/‌2017/‌dxwg/‌wiki/‌Use_Case_Working_Space#Modeling_agent_roles

PROPOSAL: edit ID13 update to include case of funding source identification as an example

<kcoyle> +1

<Caroline_> +1

<Jaroslav_Pullmann> +1

<newton> +1

<erics> +1

<DavidBrowning> +1

<nandana> +1

<PWinstanley> +1

<antoine> +1

<SumitPurohit> +1

Jaroslav_Pullmann: noes this is provenance

+1

<present__Ixchel_F_> +1

Resolved: edit ID13 update to include case of funding source identification as an example

<kcoyle> https://‌www.w3.org/‌2017/‌dxwg/‌wiki/‌Oxford_Attendance_and_logistics

Caroline_: reminder to put F2F attendance on wiki

bye

<DavidBrowning> exit

<Caroline_> bye! :)

<DavidBrowning> bye

<SumitPurohit> Bye..

Summary of Resolutions

  1. accepted minutes
  2. Accept UC ID13 with requirement to create an agreed list of roles for DCAT with the remainder for profiles
  3. edit ID13 update to include case of funding source identification as an example