See also: IRC log
<scribe> Scribe: Ian
--> https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/wiki/Agenda-20170615 Agenda
nicktr: AdrianHB, Ian and I spoke about this on Monday and there has been subsequent discussion online
straw poll last week was in support of the pull request
AdrianHB: The short version of my
take - I think that we force browsers to do more work with this
proposal. But I am ok to concede to the consensus of the group
on the PR
... however, there are are some bits in the pull request that
go beyond data validation that need attention.
... marcos has changed the algorithm so that it is less about
matching payment methods
... I am ok to move forward with the data validation (though I
am not supportive of it)
... but we need to fix the PR so that it doesn't break things
that were previously there about payment method matching
<zkoch> ::looking at recent comments::
zkoch: The editors did not meet
yesterday.
... what is the core piece that disregards the original
algo
zkoch, see => https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/pull/536#pullrequestreview-44284185
AdrianHB: One piece of the
previous text that needs to stay is about matching PMIs
... that's been lost in Marcos' edits
... it's about data validation but no longer talks about
matching
... my take is there are 2 steps:
1) Loop through things and validate data
2) Match payment methods and choose payment handlers
zkoch: I don't have strong views on the ordering of the steps
<li> Determine which <a>payment handlers</a> support any of the
- <a>payment method identifiers</a> given <var>identifiers</var>.
- For each resulting payment handler, if payment method specific
- capabilities supplied by the payment handler match those provided
- by <var>data</var>, the payment handler matches.
zkoch: I agree with AdrianHB and Ian that the text needs to address both topics. I will help coordinate the fix
Ian: +1
<adrianba> +1
nicktr: Are we in a position to say that we can move forward with the proposal from last week?
The proposal was: "For w3c-defined payment methods (i.e., those with short strings), PR API implementations MUST validate payment method request data that can be validated economically"
NickTR: Hearing no objections, SO RESOLVED
<nicktr> +1
<adrianba> yes, and we need to fix the pull request to reflect that
<Zakim> nicktr, you wanted to ask if Ian could point at the test repo in IRC
https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/wiki
https://w3c-test.org/payment-request/
NickTR: Let's also send email to the list to ask for more resources
<scribe> ACTION: NickTR to send a request for test resources to the WPWG list [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2017/06/15-wpwg-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-60 - Send a request for test resources to the wpwg list [on Nick Telford-Reed - due 2017-06-22].
AdrianHB: I mostly wanted to
thank Andre and Shopify who attended the hackathon at our
Berlin Interledger workshop
... they spent the day building a payment app (Android) that
accepts payment requests and makes payments using Interledger
payment method
... if you run your own inter ledger node, you can connect with
others and build a network of nodes that have payment
relationships with one another
... any one of them can pay any of the others even if they do
not have a direct relationship.
... what the hackathon demonstrated was that if the merchant
had a node and if the user had a payment app supporting
interledger, they could pay
... the way it works is that there's a URL in the payment
request..the payment app fetches data at that URL
... the payment app uses inter ledger to get a quote for how
much it will cost to pay the merchant, and then it makes the
payment
IJ: can you say more about the workshop?
AdrianHB: Interledger is being
developed in a CG. The workshop was 2 days (first day
presentations and demos, day 2 hackathons). We had 60 people
day 1, 40 on day 2
... we did a demo of an inter ledger payment that passed
through 7 systems...this demo got picked up by the press
... I also blogged about the event
... I expect to have a good demo at TPAC
nicktr: Thanks for the interesting news
IJ: WG will meet 6-7 Nov
<AdrianHB> Link to blog: https://adrian.hopebailie.com/making-history-in-berlin-78f1533787f0
---> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-payments-wg/2017Jun/0016.html Announcement re: registration
<AdrianHB> Links to all demo stuff from Shopify are in there too
IJ: PLEASE book your hotel
early
... We are likely to recharter the WP IG before then and
there's a draft charter for a Commerce IG
... that group would meet Thurs and Fri
https://www.w3.org/2017/03/commerce-charter.html
NickTR: On Weds I am chairing an executive summit in conjunction with TPAC
8 November
Executive Forum
(13:15-18:00)
(No link available yet)
Ian: Good progress on tokenization, credit transfer, payment handler (changes driven by implementation experience from Google and Samsung)
22 June