See also: IRC log
McCool(MC): focus on 2 devices: light, motion sensor. Definition of prot. bindings
MK: PR on the thing description, still to do
<kaz> Yongjing's slides
YZ: presentation two weeks ago
in China, in front of local organization bodies. Same time as oneM2M's F2F.
integration of WoT within oneM2M. Common scenarii, as shown in the last PlugFest
<kaz> Call for Presentations
<kaz> Call for Demos
YZ: someone from WoT? I'll be there (on behalf of oneM2M, at least)
MK: is in the calendar of IRTF T2T. Not sure anybody is going, though
YZ: calls for presentations/demos. They might expect something from WoT
Deadline for presentations: June, 20th
JH: What topic do you expect to be discussed there?
<kaz> [ there is some description on the workshop at: http://www.etsi.org/etsi-iot-workshop-2017/call-for-presentations]
YZ: main idea would be to encourage SDOs to collaborate. Collaboration WoT/oneM2M to put forward.
MC: I'll see if I can make a pres. But somebody in Europe might be better?
YZ: also call for demos. Focus on oneM2M. Can we showcase alignment with WoT?
<kaz> [ call for showcases: http://www.etsi.org/etsi-iot-workshop-2017/call-for-showcases]
MK: along those lines, specifying precisely what parts of oneM2M are of interest for WoT might be useful.
none
MC: TF TD?
TK: I moderated the last call (Sebastian is in vacation).
discussion around serialization formats
also TD namespace, asked W3C experts.
MC: question in the OCF liaison: TD templates?
TK: examples to collect from the past PlugFests, maybe?
Kaz: During the last TD call, made a proposal about spliting protocol bindings into two layers: device-independent layer and device-dependent layer
I'm encouraged to submit a pullrequest for it. Make sense to submit an issue first?
MC: good idea
MK: encapsulation as proposed here is good (separate prot. bindings, encapsulation of hypermedia controls)
TK: other topic was how to use semantics (e.g. for discovery & orchestration)
Michael Koster defined use cases, Darko proposed something based on that
MK: need a follow-up (issue)
DA: please let me know, so that I can comment
TK: that was all.
MC: LD TF?
DA: nothing new, no telco last week.
MC: Security TF?
ER: threat model available
examples still to provide
PR for that.
MC: procedure to merge PRs in the IG? (Not WG)
Kaz: co-Chairs like you (McCool and Yongjing) can make the decision about the procedure. I think the TF leaders should have permission to approve pullrequests. Elena needs to be part of the editors
MC: let's have discussion offline
later.
... Scripting TF?
JH: could not moderate last call. Zoltan?
ZK: issue regarding synchronization
common call with security next Monday
<kaz> f2f wiki
MC: registration page is up.
<kaz> Registration results so far
please register.
still no recommended hotel
Uday: Still waiting for the list. Will update right after this meeting with other alternatives
Quick update: separate payment for the restaurant (+ tour). Could participants pay cash at the venue?
MC: amount?
Uday: deadline for registration is June, 12th
Needed for the Düsseldorf Congress Center
MC: last time, last minute registration for the Open Day. Should be avoided for meeting days.
Uday: external attendees: CEO of Lemonbeat will present. Matthias spoke about someone from SigFox?
MC: agenda for the Open Day should be set soon
topics?
MK: is iot.schema.org in the scope?
MC: sure
JH: reached out to somebody from Microsoft (about Azure/WoT API). Still early
MK: found a typo within the source of the registration page
will let Kaz know about that
MC: iot.schema.org is something we could discuss? Or is it too early?
MK: is a good idea. Intention is that anybody (not only semantic geeks) uses it. Raise awareness in our group might be a good idea.
either next call or the one after.
MC: end of the meeting
[adjourned]