W3C

- DRAFT -

WoT IG/WG

07 Jun 2017

Agenda

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Kaz_Ashimura, Elena_Reshetova, Feng_Zhng, Johannes_Hund, Kunihiko_Toumura, Michael_Kster, Michael_McCool, Niklas_Widell, Taki_Kamiya, Tomoaki_Mizushima, Uday_Davuluru, Yingying_Chen, Yongjing_Zhang, Zoltan_Kis, DarkoAnicic, Daniel_Peintner, Victor_Charpenay, Katsuyoshi_Naka, Ryuichi_Matsukura, Masato_Ohura, Nan_Wang, Takeshi_Yamada, Kazuaki_Nimura
Regrets
Chair
McCool
Scribe
victor

Contents


OCF liaison

McCool(MC): focus on 2 devices: light, motion sensor. Definition of prot. bindings

MK: PR on the thing description, still to do

oneM2M liaison

<kaz> Yongjing's slides

YZ: presentation two weeks ago

in China, in front of local organization bodies. Same time as oneM2M's F2F.

integration of WoT within oneM2M. Common scenarii, as shown in the last PlugFest

ETSI's IoT Week (23 – 26 October 2017 in ETSI HQ)

<kaz> Call for Presentations

<kaz> Call for Demos

YZ: someone from WoT? I'll be there (on behalf of oneM2M, at least)

MK: is in the calendar of IRTF T2T. Not sure anybody is going, though

YZ: calls for presentations/demos. They might expect something from WoT

Deadline for presentations: June, 20th

JH: What topic do you expect to be discussed there?

<kaz> [ there is some description on the workshop at: http://www.etsi.org/etsi-iot-workshop-2017/call-for-presentations]

YZ: main idea would be to encourage SDOs to collaborate. Collaboration WoT/oneM2M to put forward.

MC: I'll see if I can make a pres. But somebody in Europe might be better?

YZ: also call for demos. Focus on oneM2M. Can we showcase alignment with WoT?

<kaz> [ call for showcases: http://www.etsi.org/etsi-iot-workshop-2017/call-for-showcases]

MK: along those lines, specifying precisely what parts of oneM2M are of interest for WoT might be useful.

presentations

none

TF reports

MC: TF TD?

TK: I moderated the last call (Sebastian is in vacation).

discussion around serialization formats

also TD namespace, asked W3C experts.

MC: question in the OCF liaison: TD templates?

TK: examples to collect from the past PlugFests, maybe?

Kaz: During the last TD call, made a proposal about spliting protocol bindings into two layers: device-independent layer and device-dependent layer

I'm encouraged to submit a pullrequest for it. Make sense to submit an issue first?

kaz's strawman image on binding

Kaz's strawman diagram on Binding

MC: good idea

MK: encapsulation as proposed here is good (separate prot. bindings, encapsulation of hypermedia controls)

TK: other topic was how to use semantics (e.g. for discovery & orchestration)

Michael Koster defined use cases, Darko proposed something based on that

MK: need a follow-up (issue)

DA: please let me know, so that I can comment

TK: that was all.

MC: LD TF?

DA: nothing new, no telco last week.

MC: Security TF?

ER: threat model available

examples still to provide

PR for that.

MC: procedure to merge PRs in the IG? (Not WG)

Kaz: co-Chairs like you (McCool and Yongjing) can make the decision about the procedure. I think the TF leaders should have permission to approve pullrequests. Elena needs to be part of the editors

MC: let's have discussion offline later.
... Scripting TF?

JH: could not moderate last call. Zoltan?

ZK: issue regarding synchronization

common call with security next Monday

F2F Logistics

<kaz> f2f wiki

MC: registration page is up.

<kaz> Registration results so far

please register.

still no recommended hotel

Uday: Still waiting for the list. Will update right after this meeting with other alternatives

Quick update: separate payment for the restaurant (+ tour). Could participants pay cash at the venue?

MC: amount?

Uday: deadline for registration is June, 12th

Needed for the Düsseldorf Congress Center

MC: last time, last minute registration for the Open Day. Should be avoided for meeting days.

Uday: external attendees: CEO of Lemonbeat will present. Matthias spoke about someone from SigFox?

MC: agenda for the Open Day should be set soon

topics?

MK: is iot.schema.org in the scope?

MC: sure

JH: reached out to somebody from Microsoft (about Azure/WoT API). Still early

MK: found a typo within the source of the registration page
will let Kaz know about that

AOB?

MC: iot.schema.org is something we could discuss? Or is it too early?

MK: is a good idea. Intention is that anybody (not only semantic geeks) uses it. Raise awareness in our group might be a good idea.

either next call or the one after.

MC: end of the meeting

[adjourned]

Summary of Action Items

Summary of Resolutions

[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.152 (CVS log)
$Date: 2017/06/07 13:19:11 $