See also: IRC log
trackbot, start meeting
<trackbot> Meeting: Silver Task Force Teleconference
<trackbot> Date: 02 June 2017
<scribe> Scribe: Sarah
<sloandr> Lowell Reade is interested in WCAG adaptations. We could use this as a case study of one organisation that created an adapted version, and a template for other similar investigations
Jan: Has contact of researcher
who is looking at WCAG adaptations
... Will share with Dave
Sarah: Stanley starting this
summer
... Pete will provide an update before next meeting
Jeanne: What is status of core questions
Sarah: Need signoff
Dave: Will share with RQTF
... Will ask for feedback by early next week
... Will ask them to respond by Wednesday
Jeanne: Let's sign off questions by next Friday
Core research questions: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vDzSCO-mEnPB7jaAzIhOOLf92b0pCuzzR8u_GSWTw_M/edit
Sarah: Dave Swallow, question about recruitment/compensation and core questions
Jeanne: Will work on getting a
budget, needs itemized list of what we need
... What would you need, prioritized
... Think about it as mini-grant, let's have meeting and figure
out what we want, or send email
Jennison: Looking at tokens of
appreciation for help, determine how many participants across
research studies, arrive at total amount
... Diary studies will likely require incentive
Dave: Incentives that are guaranteed, incentives that are offered as reward
Jennison: Incentives do drive participation
Jeanne: What else do we need?
Jan: Funds to help with meeting before CSUN
Dave: Funding specific things, participation, meetings
Jeanne: Meeting before CSUN will be after research, analysis, from there have meeting to develop prototypes
Jennison: Also consider accommodations for meetings
Jeanne: Can start with this, will reach out for more details as needed
Jennison: Is anyone looking into
impact of WCAG 2.1 on Silver?
... Lessons learned from 2.1 rollout, what worked, what
didn't?
Shawn: Some things looking at
that directly and indirectly
... Will be talking to working group participants
Jeanne: Could we add to research questions?
Shawn: There are a few questions where it's implied
Jeanne: How about adding a question, What might we learn from the rollout of WCAG 2.1?
Jennison: Also ask question in end-user community, people who are in companies that need to apply the guidelines
Jeanne: Good to look at
communication around implications of new guidelines
... How would you design a rollout, document ideas, build a
plan
<Lauriat> I've added "What can we learn from the WCAG 2.1 process and rollout?" to the research questions page: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/wiki/Research_Projects#Proposed_Research_Questions
<jeanne> Sarah: I think we should look at what we are doing individually on the team to support the research questions.
<jeanne> Shawn: Jeanne and I have been very busy this spring, but this summer things should calm down. I want to work on individual research questions.
<jeanne> Sarah: I think we should take Jennison's idea of addressing the Silver rollout as a project
<jeanne> Jan: I want to look at how we can onboard more people to participate in Silver -- simplifying the Stakeholder form
<jeanne> ... I am meeting with Jeanne on Wednesday to talk about Stakeholder onboarding and communication.
<jeanne> Sarah: We need to have a way to take ideas and move forward with them with more participation.
<jeanne> ... even if it is just a Google folder that we put ideas in that others can contribute to.
<jeanne> ... we have talked about Foundational things that we have talked about we need to do the work. Like the Core Questions. When we get these in place, we can use the shared toolkit and head in the same direction.
Jeanne: Had list of people who wanted to contribute, another part of toolkit is communicating to and enroll new people in doing work
Sarah: We were going to do an additional outreach to stakeholders, were going to offer an option to opt in
Jeanne: Were going to ask their
permission to share their information with researchers
... Letter is drafted, need opt-in form
Sarah: Maybe we should have discussion about what are things that need to be in toolkit
Shawn: Going through action items
and poll for research question prioritization
... Put all questions in poll and ask which are priorities for
Silver development
... Want to make clear as possible that we are asking what is
important for Silver
... Question, options are not directly related to development
of silver, middle option, essential for development of
Silver
Jennison: Midpoint might be may or may not be
Jeanne: How about useful but not essential
Shawn: Not having required
responses
... Concerned about people who don't have an opinion
Jennison: What about making that a choice
Shawn: Not directly related,
Essential, and I don't have an opinion
... Will make them all required
... Will present options in random order so there's not implied
prioritization
... Will send email to task force once draft is ready
https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/track/actions/open
<jeanne> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/track/actions/open
<jeanne> action-89 due 9 June
<trackbot> Set action-89 - prepare to share bonus survey with tf due date to 2017-06-09.
<jeanne> close action-86
<trackbot> Closed action-86.
<jeanne> Sarah - Communication with Stakeholders -- that is holding up the diary studies
<jeanne> ... Stakeholders are a tool in the toolkit
<jeanne> ... Budget will help Dave Swallow move forward in his study. Incentives will help with any study
<jeanne> ... onboarding for researchers - organizing all the docs that researchers need for us.
<jeanne> ... onboarding for new participants
<jeanne> ... the Core research questions
<jeanne> ... the Copyright policy
<jeanne> ... policy for using the stakeholder list
<jeanne> action-25 due 21 July
<trackbot> Set action-25 Will reeach out to w3c members who informally committed resources to silver tf. due date to 2017-07-21.
<jeanne> Sarah: Invite people to take ownership of the different parts of the toolkit and work on them with others, so they move forward.
<jeanne> ... other activities are dependent on them.
Sarah: Three buckets, Stakeholders, Budget, and Onboarding
Jeanne: Researcher Onboarding and Community Onboarding
Sarah: I will own Researcher Onboarding budget
Jeanne: Setting up the Google form and sending out update to stakeholders
Jennison: Should stakeholder communications come from co-chairs?
Sarah: Jeanne is owning Budget
Jennison: Will coordinate Community Engagement
Shawn: Will own Stakeholders
Jennison: Nov 9 event, heard back
from venues, they have room that will hold 50 people
... Would want to make sure attendance is open to community
Shawn: Keep communications casual
Jennison: First half hour mix/mingle, will turn over to Shawn/Jeanne to facilitate
<scribe> ACTION: Jennison to continue work on arranging Nov 9 meetup [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2017/06/02-silver-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Error finding 'Jennison'. You can review and register nicknames at <https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/track/users>.
Jennison: Meeting from 6:30 to 9, start up at 7
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.152 of Date: 2017/02/06 11:04:15 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Present: sloandr SarahHorton Lauriat jeanne Shawn Jan Jennison Regrets: Jemma No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: SarahHorton Found Scribe: Sarah Found Date: 02 Jun 2017 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2017/06/02-silver-minutes.html People with action items: jennison WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]