IRC log of silver on 2017-06-02
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 13:32:43 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #silver
- 13:32:43 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/06/02-silver-irc
- 13:32:45 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs world
- 13:32:48 [trackbot]
- Zakim, this will be
- 13:32:48 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot
- 13:32:48 [trackbot]
- Meeting: Silver Task Force Teleconference
- 13:32:48 [trackbot]
- Date: 02 June 2017
- 13:33:02 [Lauriat]
- agenda?
- 13:36:09 [jeanne]
- jeanne has joined #silver
- 13:38:08 [SarahHorton]
- SarahHorton has joined #silver
- 13:40:17 [sloandr]
- sloandr has joined #silver
- 13:40:25 [sloandr]
- present+
- 13:40:50 [SarahHorton]
- present+
- 13:43:00 [Lauriat]
- Present+
- 13:43:01 [SarahHorton]
- trackbot, start meeting
- 13:43:04 [Jan]
- Jan has joined #silver
- 13:43:04 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs world
- 13:43:07 [trackbot]
- Zakim, this will be
- 13:43:07 [trackbot]
- Meeting: Silver Task Force Teleconference
- 13:43:07 [trackbot]
- Date: 02 June 2017
- 13:43:07 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot
- 13:43:27 [SarahHorton]
- agenda+ Research project sheet review
- 13:43:39 [SarahHorton]
- zakim, clear agenda
- 13:43:39 [Zakim]
- agenda cleared
- 13:43:45 [SarahHorton]
- agenda+ Research project sheet review
- 13:43:50 [SarahHorton]
- agenda+ Action item review
- 13:43:55 [SarahHorton]
- agenda+ Survey meta question prioritization poll
- 13:44:02 [SarahHorton]
- zakim, take up item 1
- 13:44:02 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "Research project sheet review" taken up [from SarahHorton]
- 13:44:21 [SarahHorton]
- chair: Shawn
- 13:44:29 [SarahHorton]
- Scribe: Sarah
- 13:44:44 [sloandr]
- Lowell Reade is interested in WCAG adaptations. We could use this as a case study of one organisation that created an adapted version, and a template for other similar investigations
- 13:44:58 [jeanne]
- present+ jeanne
- 13:45:27 [SarahHorton]
- present+ Shawn, Jan
- 13:45:57 [SarahHorton]
- Jan: Has contact of researcher who is looking at WCAG adaptations
- 13:46:08 [SarahHorton]
- Jan: Will share with Dave
- 13:47:50 [SarahHorton]
- Sarah: Stanley starting this summer
- 13:49:32 [SarahHorton]
- Sarah: Pete will provide an update before next meeting
- 13:50:05 [SarahHorton]
- Jeanne: What is status of core questions
- 13:50:11 [SarahHorton]
- Sarah: Need signoff
- 13:50:28 [SarahHorton]
- Dave: Will share with RQTF
- 13:50:51 [SarahHorton]
- Dave: Will ask for feedback by early next week
- 13:51:46 [SarahHorton]
- Dave: Will ask them to respond by Wednesday
- 13:52:16 [SarahHorton]
- Jeanne: Let's sign off questions by next Friday
- 13:53:35 [SarahHorton]
- present+ Jennison
- 13:54:18 [SarahHorton]
- Core research questions: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vDzSCO-mEnPB7jaAzIhOOLf92b0pCuzzR8u_GSWTw_M/edit
- 13:57:00 [SarahHorton]
- Sarah: Dave Swallow, question about recruitment/compensation and core questions
- 13:58:17 [SarahHorton]
- Jeanne: Will work on getting a budget, needs itemized list of what we need
- 13:58:26 [SarahHorton]
- Jeanne: What would you need, prioritized
- 13:59:26 [SarahHorton]
- Jeanne: Think about it as mini-grant, let's have meeting and figure out what we want, or send email
- 14:00:20 [SarahHorton]
- Jennison: Looking at tokens of appreciation for help, determine how many participants across research studies, arrive at total amount
- 14:00:43 [SarahHorton]
- Jennison: Diary studies will likely require incentive
- 14:01:08 [SarahHorton]
- Dave: Incentives that are guaranteed, incentives that are offered as reward
- 14:01:24 [SarahHorton]
- Jennison: Incentives do drive participation
- 14:02:17 [SarahHorton]
- Jeanne: What else do we need?
- 14:02:29 [SarahHorton]
- Jan: Funds to help with meeting before CSUN
- 14:03:38 [SarahHorton]
- Dave: Funding specific things, participation, meetings
- 14:05:38 [SarahHorton]
- Jeanne: Meeting before CSUN will be after research, analysis, from there have meeting to develop prototypes
- 14:06:12 [SarahHorton]
- Jennison: Also consider accommodations for meetings
- 14:06:53 [SarahHorton]
- Jeanne: Can start with this, will reach out for more details as needed
- 14:07:41 [jeanne]
- agenda?
- 14:08:23 [SarahHorton]
- Jennison: Is anyone looking into impact of WCAG 2.1 on Silver?
- 14:09:10 [SarahHorton]
- Jennison: Lessons learned from 2.1 rollout, what worked, what didn't?
- 14:09:38 [SarahHorton]
- Shawn: Some things looking at that directly and indirectly
- 14:10:18 [SarahHorton]
- Shawn: Will be talking to working group participants
- 14:10:57 [SarahHorton]
- Jeanne: Could we add to research questions?
- 14:11:28 [SarahHorton]
- Shawn: There are a few questions where it's implied
- 14:12:04 [SarahHorton]
- Jeanne: How about adding a question, What might we learn from the rollout of WCAG 2.1?
- 14:12:41 [SarahHorton]
- Jennison: Also ask question in end-user community, people who are in companies that need to apply the guidelines
- 14:13:32 [SarahHorton]
- Jeanne: Good to look at communication around implications of new guidelines
- 14:13:49 [SarahHorton]
- Jeanne: How would you design a rollout, document ideas, build a plan
- 14:13:56 [Lauriat]
- I've added "What can we learn from the WCAG 2.1 process and rollout?" to the research questions page: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/wiki/Research_Projects#Proposed_Research_Questions
- 14:15:03 [jeanne]
- topic: Silver budget needs
- 14:15:16 [jeanne]
- topic: What can we learn from WCAG 2.1 rollout
- 14:16:10 [jeanne]
- topic: Individual Silver team members research projects
- 14:16:53 [jeanne]
- Sarah: I think we should look at what we are doing individually on the team to support the research questions.
- 14:17:59 [jeanne]
- Shawn: Jeanne and I have been very busy this spring, but this summer things should calm down. I want to work on individual research questions.
- 14:18:49 [jeanne]
- Sarah: I think we should take Jennison's idea of addressing the Silver rollout as a project
- 14:19:24 [jeanne]
- Jan: I want to look at how we can onboard more people to participate in Silver -- simplifying the Stakeholder form
- 14:19:57 [jeanne]
- ... I am meeting with Jeanne on Wednesday to talk about Stakeholder onboarding and communication.
- 14:20:31 [jeanne]
- Sarah: We need to have a way to take ideas and move forward with them with more participation.
- 14:20:56 [jeanne]
- ... even if it is just a Google folder that we put ideas in that others can contribute to.
- 14:21:50 [jeanne]
- ... we have talked about Foundational things that we have talked about we need to do the work. Like the Core Questions. When we get these in place, we can use the shared toolkit and head in the same direction.
- 14:22:38 [SarahHorton]
- Jeanne: Had list of people who wanted to contribute, another part of toolkit is communicating to and enroll new people in doing work
- 14:24:22 [SarahHorton]
- Sarah: We were going to do an additional outreach to stakeholders, were going to offer an option to opt in
- 14:24:49 [SarahHorton]
- Jeanne: Were going to ask their permission to share their information with researchers
- 14:25:03 [SarahHorton]
- Jeanne: Letter is drafted, need opt-in form
- 14:26:03 [SarahHorton]
- Sarah: Maybe we should have discussion about what are things that need to be in toolkit
- 14:26:58 [SarahHorton]
- Shawn: Going through action items and poll for research question prioritization
- 14:27:27 [SarahHorton]
- Shawn: Put all questions in poll and ask which are priorities for Silver development
- 14:27:56 [SarahHorton]
- Shawn: Want to make clear as possible that we are asking what is important for Silver
- 14:28:54 [SarahHorton]
- Shawn: Question, options are not directly related to development of silver, middle option, essential for development of Silver
- 14:29:31 [SarahHorton]
- Jennison: Midpoint might be may or may not be
- 14:29:46 [SarahHorton]
- Jeanne: How about useful but not essential
- 14:30:12 [SarahHorton]
- Shawn: Not having required responses
- 14:31:06 [SarahHorton]
- Shawn: Concerned about people who don't have an opinion
- 14:31:27 [SarahHorton]
- Jennison: What about making that a choice
- 14:33:26 [SarahHorton]
- Shawn: Not directly related, Essential, and I don't have an opinion
- 14:34:51 [SarahHorton]
- Shawn: Will make them all required
- 14:35:21 [SarahHorton]
- Shawn: Will present options in random order so there's not implied prioritization
- 14:35:53 [SarahHorton]
- Shawn: Will send email to task force once draft is ready
- 14:36:40 [SarahHorton]
- zakim, take up next
- 14:36:40 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "Action item review" taken up [from SarahHorton]
- 14:37:29 [SarahHorton]
- https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/track/actions/open
- 14:37:44 [jeanne]
- Topic: What goes in the Toolkit as part of the Action Item Review
- 14:38:08 [jeanne]
- https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/track/actions/open
- 14:40:09 [jeanne]
- action-89 due 9 June
- 14:40:09 [trackbot]
- Set action-89 - prepare to share bonus survey with tf due date to 2017-06-09.
- 14:40:47 [jeanne]
- close action-86
- 14:40:47 [trackbot]
- Closed action-86.
- 14:41:42 [jeanne]
- Sarah - Communication with Stakeholders -- that is holding up the diary studies
- 14:41:52 [jeanne]
- ... Stakeholders are a tool in the toolkit
- 14:42:29 [jeanne]
- ... Budget will help Dave Swallow move forward in his study. Incentives will help with any study
- 14:44:38 [jeanne]
- ... onboarding for researchers - organizing all the docs that researchers need for us.
- 14:44:48 [jeanne]
- ... onboarding for new participants
- 14:44:56 [jeanne]
- ... the Core research questions
- 14:45:06 [jeanne]
- ... the Copyright policy
- 14:45:20 [jeanne]
- ... policy for using the stakeholder list
- 14:46:46 [jeanne]
- action-25 due 21 July
- 14:46:46 [trackbot]
- Set action-25 Will reeach out to w3c members who informally committed resources to silver tf. due date to 2017-07-21.
- 14:48:16 [jeanne]
- Sarah: Invite people to take ownership of the different parts of the toolkit and work on them with others, so they move forward.
- 14:48:25 [jeanne]
- ... other activities are dependent on them.
- 14:51:10 [SarahHorton]
- Sarah: Three buckets, Stakeholders, Budget, and Onboarding
- 14:51:54 [SarahHorton]
- Jeanne: Researcher Onboarding and Community Onboarding
- 14:52:21 [SarahHorton]
- Sarah: I will own Researcher Onboarding budget
- 14:52:49 [SarahHorton]
- Jeanne: Setting up the Google form and sending out update to stakeholders
- 14:53:57 [SarahHorton]
- Jennison: Should stakeholder communications come from co-chairs?
- 14:55:09 [SarahHorton]
- Sarah: Jeanne is owning Budget
- 14:56:58 [SarahHorton]
- Jennison: Will coordinate Community Engagement
- 14:57:49 [SarahHorton]
- Shawn: Will own Stakeholders
- 14:58:37 [SarahHorton]
- Jennison: Nov 9 event, heard back from venues, they have room that will hold 50 people
- 14:59:57 [SarahHorton]
- Jennison: Would want to make sure attendance is open to community
- 15:00:47 [SarahHorton]
- Shawn: Keep communications casual
- 15:01:35 [SarahHorton]
- Jennison: First half hour mix/mingle, will turn over to Shawn/Jeanne to facilitate
- 15:03:00 [SarahHorton]
- action: Jennison to continue work on arranging Nov 9 meetup
- 15:03:00 [trackbot]
- Error finding 'Jennison'. You can review and register nicknames at <https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/track/users>.
- 15:06:08 [SarahHorton]
- Jennison: Meeting from 6:30 to 9, start up at 7
- 15:07:10 [SarahHorton]
- regrets+ Jemma
- 15:08:44 [SarahHorton]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 15:08:44 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/06/02-silver-minutes.html SarahHorton
- 15:08:51 [SarahHorton]
- rrsagent, make logs public
- 15:13:59 [SarahHorton]
- zakim, clear agenda
- 15:13:59 [Zakim]
- agenda cleared
- 15:14:06 [SarahHorton]
- Type rrsagent, bye
- 15:14:12 [SarahHorton]
- zakim, bye
- 15:14:12 [Zakim]
- leaving. As of this point the attendees have been sarah, david, jemma, Jan, Jeanne, Shawn, JemmaJaEunKu, sloandr, SarahHorton, Lauriat, Jennison
- 15:14:12 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #silver