<AndreaPerego> +1
<ClemensPortele> +1
<Linda> +0 wasn't there
+1
<joshlieberman> +1
<LarsG> +0 wasn't there
WG email: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2017Apr/0300.html
- Monday 8-May: freeze document (work finished on this sprint)
- Wednesday 10-May: WG vote to release
Propose: vote by correspondence for BP WD release
<joshlieberman> +1
<Linda> +1
<joshlieberman> as I'll be traveling that day
<AndreaPerego> +1
<LarsG> +1
<billroberts> +1
<MattPerry> +1
<ClemensPortele> +1
Resolved: vote by correspondence for BP WD release
... which means that the BP meeting on 10-May will be 15:00utc
- Friday 12-May: webinar** to present Best Practices to Technical Committee
(TC)
"at most a couple of slides"
plus reference the document to review.
<joshlieberman> Note from Scott that since drafts have been posted before, the 3-week rule is not hard and fast.
we would start the vote on 29 May, which ends the vote in mid-July. After the vote, there would be a 2-week electronic (email) vote by the PC.
(said Scott)
Any editorial changes post end of WG can be done by Geosemantics WG
OGC vote to start 29-May
TC vote end in mid-July
PC vote end at end-July
... to release as an OGC Best Practice document
<ClemensPortele> On the previous topic: "BP Documents shall be approved by formal electronic vote" (http://docs.opengeospatial.org/pol/05-020r24/05-020r24.html#85)
<AndreaPerego> Revised version of format tables: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2017Apr/0318.html
<joshlieberman> suggest using "encoding format"
<joshlieberman> AndreaPerego: proposing 2 separate tables, one for (encoding) formats, second for vocabularies.
<AndreaPerego> Rows from Clemens's table not included in the new format table:
<AndreaPerego> - Requires authoring of a vocabulary/schema for my data (or use of existing ones) - Supports reuse of third party vocabularies for features and properties - Supports extensions (geometry types, metadata, etc.) - Supports non-simple property values - Supports multiple values per property - Supports multiple geometries per feature - Support for non-linear interpolations in curves - Support for non-planar interpolations in surfaces
<joshlieberman> joshlieberman: where does that place languages (gml, rdf)?
<joshlieberman> Clemens: should have only 1 table for formats
<joshlieberman> jtandy: decision parameters include link support, which GeoJSON doesn't directly support (but JSON format does)
<joshlieberman> Andrea: JSON supports links, but they are not interpreted in GeoJSON standard.
josh: difference between inserting a URL into a literal text field and describing a hyperlink; the latter needs the link relation described with some additional pattern
… need to define what a link actually contains
<joshlieberman> Clemens: GeoJSON does not explicitly support linking
<joshlieberman> joshlieberman: some ambiguity with encoding versus language versus vocabulary
<joshlieberman> linda: difficult to untangle, but 2 tables may still be useful
<joshlieberman> Clemens: perfection is unattainable, but maybe we can inform without being too rigorous.
<joshlieberman> Clemens: paragraph of explaining table distinctions?
<joshlieberman> Andrea: linking to relevant BP sections help to clarify the classification of entries in the tables
<joshlieberman> joshlieberman: combination of explanatory paragraph and links to text should work
<joshlieberman> +1
<joshlieberman> jtandy: might be better to remove criterion of "stream-able"
Glossary: https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Detailed_planning_BP_document#Glossary
<joshlieberman> jtandy: Verifying the glossary needs a new owner...
<joshlieberman> jtandy: glossary issues #212, #39
<joshlieberman> Linda: #212 seems like a sizeable task
<joshlieberman> josh: can't take it on. Still finishing ogeo and GeoRSS docs
<joshlieberman> Andrea: tackling BP5 soon
<joshlieberman> josh: tackling BP 9, 13 today
<billroberts> https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/214
<joshlieberman> jtandy: trying to refer back to DWBP there
<billroberts> https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/237
<joshlieberman> jtandy: no mention of coverage data types in BP at present, so good to add.
<joshlieberman> jtandy: Jon Blower has made a response to scientific data question
<joshlieberman> bill: new schedule works for completing tasks.
<joshlieberman> jtandy: BP14 still on my plate
<joshlieberman> jtandy: BP17 still a task for Andrea.
<joshlieberman> jtandy: Linda and I have work on conclusions, etc.
<Linda> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/BP_sorted_issue_list
<joshlieberman> jtandy: josh, andrea, bill still have outstanding items to resolve in github.
<billroberts> thanks - sorry got to go, bye!
<joshlieberman> bye
<ClemensPortele> thanks, bye!
<Linda> bye
<AndreaPerego> bye
Unknown options in environment variable SCRIBEOPTIONS:
Succeeded: s/209/39/
No scribenick or scribe found. Guessed: jtandy