See also: IRC log
trackbot, prepare teleconference
<scribe> ScribeNick: addison
https://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/open
action-607?
<trackbot> action-607 -- Richard Ishida to Publish approaches to full justification as an article -- due 2017-04-06 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/607
close action-607
<trackbot> Closed action-607.
richard: w3c is working on
publishing a slightly updated version of 4 courses
... css intro, html+css intro, intermed html parts I and
II
... make suggestions on them
... fifth course intro to javascript
... will review that as well
... going through text decoration tests and changing them a
fair bit
... need fine tuning after "mass productions"
... havent sent to web platform tests yet
... or commited them yet
<fantasai> np, WPT just imported csswg-tests, having a week to settle is not bad :)
jck: X.509 certs want to include
internationalized domain names and emails
... still a work in progress
... URN doc has been approved and awaits pub
... thinking of revision of email standards like IMAP
<r12a> JEPA talk http://www.w3.org/International/talks/1703-jleq/
<r12a> chinese version at http://www.typeisbeautiful.com/2017/03/11613/
richard: my talk now
available
... see above
https://github.com/w3c/i18n-activity/projects/1
<r12a> https://twitter.com/r12a/status/798151134963757056
richard: ARIA reviewed. No comments needed. Move to "review completed"
fantasai: writing-modes is more
or less done
... text decoration
richard: status of text decor 3
?
fantasai: need to make edits that
were resolved, get feedback from i18n
... gets republished as CR
richard: when?
fantasai: 3 weeks??
richard: need to request review
fantasai: did do
... re-sending to www-international the list of things we
need
<fantasai> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-international/2016OctDec/0145.html
http://w3c.github.io/i18n-activity/encoding/commits
<r12a> https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/291
richard: this is an issue about
something different
... someone realized that rbc wasn't in html5
... they discussed in their f2f
... recommendation from chaals was remove ruby from
html5!
... richard required smelling salts
<fantasai> “Having read that, I cried for an hour, and then picked myself up off the floor and wrote back”
richard: need something to
replace it before removing it
... need a content model, not just syntax
... to also cover things like WebVTT and TTML2
... content model, think about things like rbc, nested syntax
for double-sided
... I might argue against it
... it being nested
... that's my point of view
... chaals wrote back to say "just a proposal"
(discussion ensues)
fantasai: don't have opinion on
where, only how
... just so long as destination is correct
richard: don't move until you have something to replace, don't leave for 1.5 years with *no* ruby spec
fantasai: can update ruby annotation with note to say "not being maintained"
richard: problem is that we don't
have a target to point to
... extension spec for html and content model for html
... which might keep nested
... but want to get to a replacement for ruby annotation
spec
... use tabular instead of interleaved
... syntax for html in extension spec go look at X
... webvtt look at Y
... which they are asking about
addison: ruby annotation 2
richard: please don't remove ruby
from html until we have something ready
... 2. if thinking of taking text out we would want to check it
first
... (out meaning into another doc)
... 3. thinking of a ruby2 that is only a content model
... won't replace the extension spec
... 4. please indicate in ruby extension spec that it's inside
html
<scribe> ACTION: addison: write to chaals and HTML indicating our preferences (see minutes) regarding handling of ruby in html [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2017/04/06-i18n-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-609 - Write to chaals and html indicating our preferences (see minutes) regarding handling of ruby in html [on Addison Phillips - due 2017-04-13].
<scribe> ACTION: richard: start working on what a new version or update for ruby annotation would look like [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2017/04/06-i18n-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-610 - Start working on what a new version or update for ruby annotation would look like [on Richard Ishida - due 2017-04-13].
addison: will agendize these as closed next week if no one says "hey, wait a minute..."
<r12a> s/Jan, Nelson/Jan Nelson/
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.152 of Date: 2017/02/06 11:04:15 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) FAILED: s/Jan, Nelson/Jan Nelson/ Succeeded: s/css, html parts I and II/css intro, html+css intro, intermed html parts I and II/ Succeeded: s/for things like webvtt/to also cover things like WebVTT and TTML2/ Succeeded: s/will agendize these as closed/will agendize these as closed next week/ Default Present: Addison, Steven, Richard, Jan, Nelson, JcK, Fantasai, r12a Present: Addison Steven Richard Jan Nelson JcK Fantasai r12a Found ScribeNick: addison Inferring Scribes: addison Found Date: 06 Apr 2017 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2017/04/06-i18n-minutes.html People with action items: addison richard write[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]