See also: IRC log
<Lisa_Seeman> agenda: this
<JohnRochford> Lisa, I'm on the call, waiting to talk with you.
<JohnRochford> I'm saying "hello" on the call, but nobody is responding.
<Lisa_Seeman> on now
<Lisa_Seeman> scribe: Jim_S
Lisa: Due to low numbers, no major decisions will be made
<Lisa_Seeman> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/track/actions/open
<Lisa_Seeman> https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/extension/status.html
Lisa: We still are short of
success criteria managers for all SC classified as "High"
... Neil M offered to do undo and return, Jim_S offered to do
SC#26 clear structure and relationships
<Lisa_Seeman> https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/extension/status.html
Lisa: We will address allocation of SC after the call
Pietro is not able to take any SC for the moment
Lisa: Guidlines may be required for the working with the Emotional Disabilities research paper
<Lisa_Seeman> resolution, work idivaly on sections untill the guidlines are in place
<Lisa_Seeman> resolution : Create Guidelines for working with Emotional Disabilities
<Lisa_Seeman> +1
+1
<kirkwood> +1
<Pietro> +1
<Jan> +1 - agree with resolution
<JohnRochford> +1
<Jan> p+ Jan
Lisa: two approaches to Acceptance Crieteria management and commenting
1) Adoptable, reasonable standards and 2) Err on the sdie of helping people with disablilities
Michael C: we need to consider the balance between achievability and helping people. We should try and have SC that are easy to conform to but need to meet the needs of users. We should consider if specific supplemental advice for sites tagrget at specific groups would be useful
Not a prioity at the moment
Lisa: Let's not loose wide scope introduced by AAA
Michael C: we may be able to tag SC to bring in AAA where userrs are particularly concerned.
Lisa: We should aim to create an
ecosystem that simplfies using semantics
... Adding sematicts is the traditional way of adding
accessibility
John Rochford: Planning on letting WCAG know that his two SC are ready for pull-request. What happens next?
Lisa: Put a summary of any comments on the call into GitHub
Michael Cooper: SC usually need work. Sending a message to mailing list and ask for comments, contact people privately who may have and interest are ways to generate interest and comments. Note personal concerns and ask for comments
Michael Cooper: When there is sufficent input, try and gain consensus
Michael Cooper: SC Managers try to reword SC to achieve consensus. Test rewording is a possibility
Michael Cooper: Once consensus from people who have participated in the discussion, the SC should be moved to the workinggroup
Michael Cooper: Pull requests are the step before surveying and consensus. Add feedback from the wider group and resubmitt if required.
Michale Cooper: First working draft should be out in about a month
Lisa: COGA needs to get into the 1st working draft as new implememtations and technology are often required. If implementation requirements are in the 1st working draft they are likely to get adopted. Anything dependant on adoption have to be in the 1st working draft - e.g. personalisation and authentication
Michael Cooper agrees but doesn't feel that 1st working draft is a bar to adoption
<Lisa_Seeman> https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/32
Michael Cooper: Seed-questions can help generate discussion
Lisa Seeman: is available in her morning hours - perferably via Skype
<Jan> I have to drop for another meeting. Thanks, everyone!
Lisa Seeman: Meeting closed :)
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.148 of Date: 2016/10/11 12:55:14 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Found Scribe: Jim_S Inferring ScribeNick: Jim_S Present: JohnRochford Lisa_Seeman Pietro kirkwood Jim_S Janina Regrets: EA Steve ayelet Mike_pluke Thaddeus WARNING: No meeting title found! You should specify the meeting title like this: <dbooth> Meeting: Weekly Baking Club Meeting WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth Got date from IRC log name: 23 Jan 2017 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2017/01/23-coga-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]