See also: IRC log
<JeffH> does it matter or not whether one adds one's handle to the `present+` command?
<scribe> scribenick: jcj_moz
<weiler> name or handle or something is important, for attendance in minutes. there's nothing re: the irc bots that otherwise cares, AFAIK
tony: Cancelling next week's meeting due to the FIDO face-to-face
weiler: Starting with the following meeting, will be switching out the conference call information
tony: So we have some open PRs to
go over today...
... Continuing 314, 319, and 321.
... so I believe jcj_moz has been looking at 314
JeffH: I probably need to review 314/319 and haven't had time
jcj_moz: Seems like we need editors of html to triage the issue #769 at html
JeffH: I think we just make the PR and watch what happens
jcj_moz: I don't know what to do next
JeffH: Maybe talk to bz or annevk
1-1
... So I guess 314/319 are in progress
Tony: Someday it will end.
JeffH: That moves us to 321
... I do have comments. I'm still in progress on review.
... Overall vgb has done a bangup job; it's difficult to figure
out the relationships between these terms that we don't clearly
delineate, but from tech perspective it looks good
vgb: I also pushed out a couple
of detail-level wording touchups today
... I also have some improvements ... in reading through it,
one of the weak areas is trust verification on DAA, so I'll
work with __??__ offline to explain
JeffH: I'll help
vgb: If you find ways to improve the presentation, help
JeffH: I went through and pulled out a list of all the attestation terms, and it's an amazing number
Rolf: What do people think about
adding a figure to explain the attestation elements and how
they're nested
... How they all fit together.
JeffH: That's what I was thinking about, trying to figure out how it all nests
Rolf: I had to draw a picture while reading that thing. And if I had to do that, it's a good sign that we should
vgb: We could put that sketch in for starters
Rolf: What are the constraints about graphics?
vgb: We'll use SVG for presentation
Rolf: We don't require SVG's data to be hand-editable?
vgb: Right.
JeffH: So I'll work on this, this afternoon
<JeffH> pr #321 textual diff: http://kingsmountain.com/doc/diff/diff-webauthn-vgb-u2f-attestation-0d0fcea--from--master-6267cc1.pdf
Tony: Rolf's going to work on a diagram. Jeff and Alexei are going to give comments back. When do we think that we can close this? What we discussed last week was as soon as we can close this one, we want to publish a 4th draft
<JeffH> does not include further changes since this last weekdn
Tony: Given that we aren't going to meet next week - a bunch of us will be there in person to discuss this if need be, but I'd like to get some level of agreement amongst people at the meeting next week to push this to closure
JeffH: Something we've discussed
in the past was to do WD updates more often
... We don't have to take everything marked WD-04 to release
WD-04
jcj_moz: Will finish review in next 12 hours
JeffH: Let's say publish the week after-next
Tony: I want to get the comments
out there so we can discuss in person
... That takes us out of PRs, so into issues?
<selfissued> Terminology matters!
Tony: Any issues out there hanging up implementation?
Angelo: <not really... the edge implementation is internal builds (?)>
alexei: Google's is in the public, so you can follow along
Tony: jcj_moz - do you have hardware support yet?
jcj_moz: No.
Angelo: Should we start a milestone WD-05?
JeffH: I'll do that
vgb: I think some of the WD-04 isssues are done in PR 321.
<apowers> anyone want to approve my PR from November?
<apowers> https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/4120
<apowers> sorry, that's from October
weiler: I've posted Websec and the Privacy WG to the list for those interested
oops
Tony: OK, let's give you 30m back then
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.148 of Date: 2016/10/11 12:55:14 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/apowers/weiler/ Found ScribeNick: jcj_moz Inferring Scribes: jcj_moz WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found. Default Present: JefH, rbarnes, samsrinivas, jcj_moz, Rolf, vgb, weiler, nadalin, Kim, selfissued, apowers, angelo, Ketan, alexei WARNING: Replacing previous Present list. (Old list: (no, one), JefH, rbarnes, samsrinivas, jcj_moz, Rolf) Use 'Present+ ... ' if you meant to add people without replacing the list, such as: <dbooth> Present+ JefH, rbarnes, samsrinivas, jcj_moz, Rolf Present: JefH rbarnes samsrinivas jcj_moz Rolf vgb weiler nadalin Kim selfissued apowers angelo Ketan alexei Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webauthn/2017Jan/0086.html Found Date: 18 Jan 2017 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2017/01/18-webauthn-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found! Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>. Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of new discussion topics or agenda items, such as: <dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]