See also: IRC log
scribe Léonie
JS: We have a new member.
... introductions.
action-2103?
<trackbot> action-2103 -- Janina Sajka to Review https://www.w3.org/tr/vehicle-information-service/ vehicle signal server specification -- due 2016-11-16 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2103
JS: Think this can be closed.
MC: Defer or close?
JS: Defer.
<MichaelC> action-2103 due 6 months
<trackbot> Set action-2103 Review https://www.w3.org/tr/vehicle-information-service/ vehicle signal server specification due date to 2017-06-07.
action-2101?
<trackbot> action-2101 -- Léonie Watson to Check with web platform chairs about a11y implications of service workers https://www.w3.org/tr/service-workers-1/ -- due 2016-11-02 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2101
LJW: Haven't done it. Can someone remind me what it was?
MC: Do we need to review?
LW: Give me another week?
<MichaelC> action-2101 due 1 week
<trackbot> Set action-2101 Check with web platform chairs about a11y implications of service workers https://www.w3.org/tr/service-workers-1/ due date to 2016-12-14.
MC: No other actions for this year and/or people present.
<MichaelC> Pointer Lock 2.0
LW: No need to review for
now.
... We should review in the future, but not for perhaps six
months when the Shadow DOM content is brought in.
<MichaelC> ACTION: cooper to ping review on Pointer Lock 2 https://www.w3.org/TR/pointerlock-2/ [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2016/12/07-apa-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-2105 - Ping review on pointer lock 2 https://www.w3.org/tr/pointerlock-2/ [on Michael Cooper - due 2016-12-14].
<MichaelC> action-2105 due 6 months
<trackbot> Set action-2105 Ping review on pointer lock 2 https://www.w3.org/tr/pointerlock-2/ due date to 2017-06-07.
<MichaelC> Streams API
LW: Has now been published as a Note.
MC: Do we want to review the WHATWG version?
JS: I think we have enough to do in W3C space.
<MichaelC> URL
MC: Closed as a Note.
<MichaelC> WebSub
MC: Shane had an ation to
review.
... We have since received a specific review request.
<MichaelC> action-2105: https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Pointer_Lock_2.0
<trackbot> Notes added to action-2105 Ping review on pointer lock 2 https://www.w3.org/tr/pointerlock-2/.
JS: There was a workshop.
... Some accessibility people from the Bay Area attended.
<MichaelC> trackbot, associate action-2105 with product-8
<trackbot> action-2105 (Ping review on pointer lock 2 https://www.w3.org/tr/pointerlock-2/) associated with product-8.
JS: Workshop report referenced in the URL from the agenda topic.
TD: That URL isn't working.
MC: It should become
visible.
... Too many requests triggers a block sometimes.
... The report includes a section on accessibility.
... Good that it is being considered.
... Next question is what role do we play in helping those
things happen?
<MichaelC> http://w3c.github.io/pfwg/wtag/checklist.html
JS: Our deadline is coming up.
MC: No news since my last
report.
... I have updated the checklist though.
<MichaelC> https://rawgit.com/w3c/pfwg/master/wtag/checklist.html
MC: It isn't formatted properly
yet.
... There are sections for specs that provide APIs, graphics
etc.
... I'm trying to get it semi-complete.
... We might want to refine the categories and/or add more
explanatory information.
JS: When did we promise this to
PLH?
... January?
MC: I think January for a decent first draft, and end of March for completion.
JS: I think we're on track.
... Would be good to ask other WGs to return self-reviews to an
archive somewhere.
MC: At times I suspect we would look at the results of a survey and think the WG was wrong to think the questions/topics didn't apply to them.
JS: Yes, but the idea is to
understand what they have thought about.
... Think we should share this for comment now.
JS: JF should be back in
circulation early next year.
... Suggest we defer this until then.
JS: We have a number of people
signed up for the CSS TF.
... Problem is that we're supposed to come up with a
co-facilitator.
... We may defer naing an accessiility co-facilitator.
LW: Who is the CSS co-facilitator?
JS: Rossen Atanassov.
MC: Cynthia is unable to help.
LW: What is the time commitment expectation?
MC: 4 hours/week.
JS: We're experiencing a lot of churn right now.
JS: We will meet once more before
the holidays, on Wednesday 14th.
... Then again Wednesday 4th January.
TD: Will people in this group be included in the Silver TF for WCAG?
MC: You'd need to join the WCAG
WG, then ask me to add you to the Silver TF.
... There is a high time commitment expectation for the Silver
TF.
... Take a look at the Silver TF homepage, then email me and/or
the TF facilitators.
<scribe> chair: Janina
<scribe> scribe: Léonie
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.148 of Date: 2016/10/11 12:55:14 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: tink Found Scribe: Léonie Present: Janina teddrake Joanmarie_Diggs Léonie John Regrets: John Gottfried Found Date: 07 Dec 2016 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2016/12/07-apa-minutes.html People with action items: cooper[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]