See also: IRC log
<scribe> scribe: Janina
[people are introducing themselves]
jw: Consists of ideas that arose
from APA discussions
... Topics include authentication (also including captcha);
personalization, ...
... Methodological advice for Silver (from WCAG); ...
https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/task-forces/research-questions/work-statement
Workplan URI is ...
sh: Interested about including apps, is that in scope?
jw: Notes WCAG has an active
Mobile Accessibility TF
... They're developing requirements for WCAG 2.1 and beyond
sh: Example of interest is virtual reality and how that could help pwds
jb: Notes we should look at the Work Statement for scoping questions ...
https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/task-forces/research-questions/work-statement
jb: Notes that VR not currently up for WCAG 2.1, but hopes it is for Silver
janina: Noting her view that any tech using http is in scope -- browsers being a general user instance; and apps being specific task instances
Here's the Workplan:
https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/task-forces/research-questions/wiki/Work_Plan
jb: Notes the Silver work and apps are OK, but TF is more directly tied to APA's concerns
ds: Recalling that rdwg was more driven by interests of participants, and likes that we're coordinating topics with other W3 work this time
jw: Notes potential additions for the Workplan and we should discuss on list
jw: There is interest around W3C,
including around WAI to enhance how authentication is handled
on the web
... APIs are being developed by a Web Authentication WG
... Would include biometrics, as well as multifactor
... We need to start thinking about the a11y implications of
all these approaches
... We should look to inform W3 activity on this, and also
related WCAG responses
... Suggest we need to identify prior research and pubs in this
area
janina: Notes the joint meeting
during TPAC and that we were pointed to a developer group that
implements specs in devices
... We neglected to scribe, but I will post that group's
contact info
jw: Anyone with experience in this area? Or interested in taking this on specifically?
<jasonjgw> Janina: it was clear from the joint meeting that risk-based authentication was being promoted for use on the server. There are several ways of judging risk and different levels of confidence regarding the information provided by the client.
jw: So, they call it "risk based
authentication"
... Server acquires data from client, and these are factored
along with other data, e.g. ip of the client
jw: Very interested in developing
useful data gathering instruments to inform Silver
... So are keen on obtaining methodological guidance
... Also in developing comprehensive literature of
relevance
... Want to coordinate with RQTF on these
ds: I've already joined the
Silver TF and would be happy to liaison for RQTF
... Discussion of authentication got me thinking about our own
methodology in this group
... Should we be looking to develop a listing of a11y experts
in various important areas of concern?
... So we would know who's working in a particular area?
jb: Interesting suggestion.
... Hope we look in multiple communities, both in a11y and in
the topic area itself
... Hope that we look at enough that this would become a fluid
interaction and we would continue to reach out on each
topic
ds: Agree we shouldn't digress on
this, just as a quick and basic help to get us going
... Noting that this might be a way to draw in more
participation for the RQTF
jw: Yes, if we know of contributors in general, or on a specific topic area, please contact and encourage their participation
sh: What's the best process? Can we forward them to Jason
jw: Notes the "participation" section in the Work Statement
js: Also good to let Jason know, so we can track and help
ds: Will try to come up with a
few names of persons we might benefit from
... Should I email? Is there a wiki?
jw: Likes the notion of a wiki in
order to tie in publications, etc
... I'll volunteer to continue looking at authentication
...
sh: Happy to get involved
ds: Also
js: Suggesting 30 November
sh: Will be flying, but regular
sounds fine
... One hour earlier would be easier
<sloandr> thanks, everyone!
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.148 of Date: 2016/10/11 12:55:14 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/goot/good/ Found embedded ScribeOptions: -final *** RESTARTING DUE TO EMBEDDED OPTIONS *** Found Scribe: Janina Inferring ScribeNick: janina Present: Janina sloandr Scott David_Sloan Gottfried Got date from IRC log name: 16 Nov 2016 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2016/11/16-rqtf-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]