See also: IRC log
<janina> http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/users/my
<janina> Michael, should be correct in the agenda, stand by ...
<MichielBijl> Sorry, was being lazy.
<janina> scribe: Janina
[no news to share]
action-2102?
<trackbot> action-2102 -- Janina Sajka to Review spatial data on the web use cases & requirements https://www.w3.org/tr/sdw-ucr/ -- due 2016-11-09 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2102
<MichaelC> close action-2102
<trackbot> Closed action-2102.
Janina: No issues
action-2099?
<trackbot> action-2099 -- Michael Cooper to Ping review of css table module level 3 -- due 2016-02-15 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2099
<MichaelC> action-2099 due 2017-02-15
<trackbot> Set action-2099 Ping review of css table module level 3 due date to 2017-02-15.
Michael: Oops, put in the wrong year when we extended this for a ping
action-2096?
<trackbot> action-2096 -- Ted Drake to Check how micropub comments have been disposed -- due 2016-10-26 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2096
Ted: Enhanced with new methods
for alt text
... New method added in support of alt in micropub
<MichaelC> close action-2096
<trackbot> Closed action-2096.
action-2094?
<trackbot> action-2094 -- Janina Sajka to Review tv control api specification https://www.w3.org/tr/tvcontrol-api/ -- due 2016-11-09 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2094
Janina finding no support for most all of the alternative media specified by the MAUR
janina: We have some work here
<MichaelC> action-2094 due 15 Dec
<trackbot> Set action-2094 Review tv control api specification https://www.w3.org/tr/tvcontrol-api/ due date to 2016-12-15.
<MichaelC> action-2094: Janina to draft comments referencing MAUR.
<trackbot> Notes added to action-2094 Review tv control api specification https://www.w3.org/tr/tvcontrol-api/.
We will need to comment, Janina to draft
action-2091?
<trackbot> action-2091 -- Janina Sajka to Review web animations https://www.w3.org/tr/web-animations-1/ -- due 2016-10-26 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2091
<MichaelC> close action-2091
<trackbot> Closed action-2091.
action-2087?
<trackbot> action-2087 -- Cynthia Shelly to Review https://www.w3.org/tr/input-events/ input events -- due 2016-10-31 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2087
<MichaelC> Rich review: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2016Nov/0005.html
<MichaelC> action-2086: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2016Nov/0005.html
<trackbot> Notes added to action-2086 Review https://www.w3.org/tr/input-events/ input events.
<MichaelC> close action-2087
<trackbot> Closed action-2087.
Canonical EXI
<MichaelC> Canonical EXI
<MichaelC> Content Security Policy Level 2
<Ryladog_> ScribeNick: Ryladog
<Ryladog_> MC: Geolocation API 2nd editions,went straight to Rec
<MichaelC> Geolocation API Specification 2nd Edition
<Ryladog_> MC: Incorporates errata
<Ryladog_> MC: WedIDL thing, I think we dont care
<Ryladog_> JS: I agree
<MichaelC> Resource Timing Level 2
<Ryladog_> MC: We have Resources Timing Level 1 and 2
<Ryladog_> MC: No need to review
<Ryladog_> JS: If you havent seen this,we have been asked to come up with a version 1 - of am Accessibility Checklist. there is a draft
<Ryladog_> MC: We do not think it is complete, but no one has commentsed. We have promised W3M we would have a version of this by the end of the year
<Ryladog_> JS: Thought on this today?
<Ryladog_> MC: I havent a chnace to write anything up, I look at the I18N and Privacy Cheklists. I have thoughts, it is helpful. I18N has a lot of references
<Ryladog_> MC: Privacy was extremely simptistic
<Ryladog_> JS: I like the idea of having pointers
<MichaelC> http://w3c.github.io/pfwg/wtag/checklist.html
<Ryladog_> JS: We are supposed o be the in depth resources
<Ryladog_> MC: He sent a followup today
<Ryladog_> JS: Yes I have a response for him, we can point him to the CSS, and that we agreed to do this by media quieries
<Ryladog_> MC: and that is awaiting on the CSS task force to get moving
<Ryladog_> JS: I thpught the timing was excellent they are just finishing 4 and starting on 5
<Ryladog_> MC: There is a wide reveiw notice
<Ryladog_> JS: I want to look at it again
<Ryladog_> MC: You said there are no issues, tell them we looked at it
<Ryladog_> MC: It looks like we do not have to reapond
<Ryladog_> MC: Is that on HTML 5.2?
<Ryladog_> JS: I did not see any reason why we would care
<Ryladog_> JS: There is also ARIA and HTML which I think we referred to the ARIA WG
<Ryladog_> JS: IndexED she is asking a review of
<Ryladog_> MC: IndexDV
<Ryladog_> MC: I saw one in my inbox, said we do not need to review,but could provide a coutesy reply
<Ryladog_> JS: OK
<MichielBijl> scribe: MichielBijl
MB: I’ll take ARIA in HTML
JS: You want an action?
MB: Yeah sure
<MichaelC> ACTION: Michiel to review ARIA in HTML http://www.w3.org/TR/html-aria/ [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2016/11/09-apa-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-2104 - Review aria in html http://www.w3.org/tr/html-aria/ [on Michiel Bijl - due 2016-11-16].
JS: My main concern is if there’s a difference between ARIA in HTML and the APG
<MichaelC> action-2104?
<trackbot> action-2104 -- Michiel Bijl to Review aria in html http://www.w3.org/tr/html-aria/ -- due 2016-11-16 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2104
JS: Don’t want conflicting advice in the different documents.
<MichaelC> action-2104: https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/ARIA_in_HTML
<trackbot> Notes added to action-2104 Review aria in html http://www.w3.org/tr/html-aria/.
MC: What is the other one?
JS: IndexDB
MC: Don’t know if we’ve looked at
it
... We determined on August 24th that we didn’t need to review
it
JS: Okay you can tell her that
MC: That is it for spec reviews.
JS: Any other business?
KHS: Do we all have to move to Canada?
link to that map: https://twitter.com/EByard/status/796317753749729280
alt=all except seven states are blue among the 18-25 demographic.
*concerns about ADA and 508 Refresh*
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.148 of Date: 2016/10/11 12:55:14 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/??/KHS/ Found Scribe: Janina Inferring ScribeNick: janina WARNING: No scribe lines found matching previous ScribeNick pattern: <Ryladog> ... Found ScribeNick: Ryladog Found Scribe: MichielBijl Inferring ScribeNick: MichielBijl WARNING: No scribe lines found matching previous ScribeNick pattern: <Ryladog> ... Scribes: Janina, MichielBijl ScribeNicks: Ryladog, janina, MichielBijl Present: Ted MichielBijl Janina Joanmarie_Diggs MichaelC Katie_Haritos-Shea WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth Found Date: 09 Nov 2016 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2016/11/09-apa-minutes.html People with action items: michiel WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]