W3C

- DRAFT -

Silver

16 Sep 2016

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
AWK, jeanne, Shawn
Regrets
Sarah
Chair
SV_MEETING_CHAIR
Scribe
jeanne

Contents


[discussion of TPAC logistics of arrival and meeting times]

<Lauriat> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1No9ANI6YFEnYNjVsQgRqRxEx4RGeVJl9_3Kt-VAfSvI/edit#

setting the agenda for WCAG TPAC

The goals for TPAC are not the goals for what will go into Silver, but how the process will be decided.

<scribe> scribenick: jeanne

Introductions - 30 min

Individuals

Silver

Subgroup work

Goals for TPAC - emphasis that it is our research/outreach plan for the process itself, and the process will decide what goes into Silver.

Overall timeline

Break! - 30 min

Guided discussion - 90 min

* Review of the goals in the poll - 10 min

* https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/silversurvey2016/results

* Informal anonymous vote on top preference to start discussion - 10 min

* Debates between the factions - 20 min

* Reporting back to the larger group - 10 min

* Delve into details of the top option - 30 min

* Statement of the winner - 10 min

* Review of reasoning for all options in context of decision

* We’ll then take the notes and results and turn into communication to the “outside” world for comments

Revision of agenda

Jeanne messed up the copy paste, and discovered it when she sent the minutes, so here is the corrected version for the HTML minutes

Agenda for TPAC

Introductions - 30 min

* Individuals

* Silver

* Subgroup work

* Goals for TPAC - emphasis that it is our research/outreach plan for the process itself, and the process will decide what goes into Silver.

* Overall timeline

Walkthrough of each option - 1 hr

* Intro to phases and common structure - 10 min

* Design Driven Option (still being written)

- This is the group of methods best oriented toward producing the best research and data-driven decisions for the design of Silver.

* Faster Progress Option

- This is the group of methods best oriented toward producing Silver most expeditiously.

* Greatest Flexibility Option

- This is the group of methods that will provide a flexible design that will adapt to changing future needs.

* Lowest Cost/Minimum Resources Option

- This is the most constrained option, but may be the reality that we need to deal with.

Break! - 30 min

Guided discussion - 90 min

* Review of the goals in the poll - 10 min

- https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/silversurvey2016/

* Informal anonymous vote on top preference to start discussion - 10 min

* Debates between the factions - 20 min

* Reporting back to the larger group - 10 min

Delve into details of the top option - 30 min

Statement of the winner - 10 min

Review of reasoning for all options in context of decision

We’ll then take the notes and results and turn into communication to the “outside” world for comments

Summary of Action Items

Summary of Resolutions

[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.144 (CVS log)
$Date: 2016/09/16 14:47:38 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.144  of Date: 2015/11/17 08:39:34  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Found ScribeNick: jeanne
Inferring Scribes: jeanne
Present: AWK jeanne Shawn
Regrets: Sarah

WARNING: No meeting chair found!
You should specify the meeting chair like this:
<dbooth> Chair: dbooth

Got date from IRC log name: 16 Sep 2016
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2016/09/16-silver-minutes.html
People with action items: 

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.


[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]