See also: IRC log
qa: let's get started
... goes through the agenda
qa: web api best practice for
LBS
... would like to talk at the f2f meeting next week
ka: do you have a link?
qa: still on my pc locally
... will send to the group or upload on the wiki
... after the meeting in next week, can we publish a BG note?
... Philippe Coliott also wants to gather API design ideas
... if we want to create a BG report on the API design, what should
we do?
ka: send the draft document to the
group
... get approval of the whole group
... and then we can publish it as a BG note on the BG wiki
qa: ok
... that's the status of the LBS TF
ka: you'll upload the initial draft
this week
... and we'll review it in Lisbon. right?
qa: right
rd: reviewing the other API in part
of the last TV Control meeting action item
... all the different sources
... how to map with each other
... based on the Media Tuner spreadsheet
... combining different names/things
... e.g., track, content, podcast
... going through them
... how to minimize controls by combining
ka: can we review the result in Lisbon next week?
rd: yes
ka: great
rd: we can go through it during the
meeting next week
... somebody from Pandora also on this call?
dm: would review it
rd: your help would be great
wl: TV Control group will have their
meeting in Lisbon. right?
... maybe we could have a joint meeting?
... comparison between their spec and ours
ka: do you mean inviting TV Control guys to Ryan's session?
rd: will report that as well back to the TV Control guys
<scribe> ACTION: Ryan to talk with the TV Control WG guys about a possible joint session during TPAC [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2016/09/13-auto-minutes.html#action01]
qa: any more comments?
(none)
qa: LBS
... Media Tuner
<QingAn> https://www.w3.org/auto/wg/wiki/Main_Page#Sept_19_-_23.2C_2016.2C_TPAC.2C_Lisbon
qa: the above is the current draft agenda
wl: security&privacy?
... do we want to have a joint session with the Web Apps Security
WG?
... we need to have some opinion with a leader
qa: there is an IG as well.
right?
... maybe we should consider which group to have a joint
meeting
ka: can talk with the team contacts about which group to talk
wl: we have the security&privacy
tf and we should have some opinion
... we should check with the security tf first
ka: ok
... will talk with Hashimoto-san first then
... and get back to you all
<scribe> ACTION: kaz to talk with Hashimoto-san about if it would make sense to have a joint session with the security WG/IG during TPAC [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2016/09/13-auto-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-23 - Talk with hashimoto-san about if it would make sense to have a joint session with the security wg/ig during tpac [on Kazuyuki Ashimura - due 2016-09-20].
qa: the draft agenda doesn't have concrete time allocation
ka: by email?
qa: email is ok
qa: any other business for
today?
... you can send it by email as well
wl: wanted to check...
... the vehicle service spec is the most important topic
... how much time do you want, Kevin and Adam?
ac: quite extensive review
wl: morning of the 1st day?
ac: 1st day morning + some more
wl: feasible
... this is the most important one
kv: ready for review
wl: the current draft is ready for review. right?
kv: by the deadline :)
wl: tx
... based on the discussion, we can build our agenda
ka: which version to be used, GitHub
or Wiki?
... my understanding is GitHub
kv: yes, the GitHub version is the official
ka: it seemed there were some changes to the wiki by Powell
ac: those changes should be going to go into the GitHub version shortly
ka: ok
kv: the GitHub version only has the sever spec
ka: ok
kv: and you're right
... the wiki version includes all of the spec
... including the client and security portion
ka: ok
... tx for your clarification
-> https://www.w3.org/auto/wg/wiki/Vehicle_Information_Service_Specification wiki version
-> http://w3c.github.io/automotive/vehicle_data/vehicle_information_service.html GitHub version
qa: if there is no more question/comment, the meeting is adjourned
[ adjourned ]