See also: IRC log
<scribe> scribe: MichaelC
<scribe> meeting: ARIA Editors
agendum 3 = Glossary stuff https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/106 and https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/76
last: https://www.w3.org/2016/01/20-aria-editors-minutes#item02
same as last time
but also add ARIA practices
some issues in AccName might not be done, but still ok to publish
<ShaneM> Needs a quiet time...
MichaelC forgot to do this in Dec
could do 12 Feb
or 19 Feb
or with next publication cycle if we´re all hands off
make sure to send the hands off mail to people individually
let´s do at time of next heartbeat publication
<Zakim> clown, you wanted to ask how this affects urls that currently reference the things to be moved?
what about impact on rawgit URIs
also might cause us to look at github.io URIs
<scribe> ACTION: cooper to see if it´s possible to set up redirects when github resources change location [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2016/02/03-aria-editors-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-2010 - See if it´s possible to set up redirects when github resources change location [on Michael Cooper - due 2016-02-10].
we have common terms from which we include
it´s winnowed to only include terms used in that doc
a bug is that if I ref term A, and it refs term B but nothing else does, term B doesn´t get included though it needs to be
I have a fix, but don´t want to perturb anything
there´s enough lead time to next pub cycle that we could play with it now
<joanie> https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/112 ?
SM will put in fix
can review rawgit of branch? yes
<MichielBijl> +1 to branches in main repo
<MichielBijl> Makes rebases easier too
Joanie suggest editing in branch in main repo, rather than in branch of private repo followed by pull request
people can review in the branch
easy to merge into master
find it easier than dealing with pull requests
it is possible to comment on lines in a pull request
but that may be possible on individual commits anyways
general consensus we prefer to use branches instead of pull requests
allow pulll requests for outside contributors
In the ARIA spec there are <hr> between each section
suggests a thematic change, but <section> elements do that intrinsically
<Zakim> ShaneM, you wanted to discuss the new stylesheet
we may have had a reason before, but not clear we need it
the new TR CSS does this stuff for us
we shouldn´t add the styling
general consensus we can remove those
editors, please do for your own specs
MB has done some indent fixing in APG
question about line wraps
https://www.w3.org/2016/01/06-aria-editors-minutes.html#item05
some of us prefer one line per para, easier to edit text
others like shorter lines
this may be very much the preference of specific editors, so perhaps shouldn´t impose a repo-wide rule, leave it to each spec
<MichielBijl> https://github.com/w3c/aria/blob/master/practices/aria-practices.html
<MichielBijl> Sorry: https://github.com/w3c/aria/blob/master/practices/aria-practices.html#L185
shorter lines make diffs easier to use
<jamesn> +1 to that too - I like short lines too.
a middle approach is one *sentence* per line
<tzviya> +1 I like short lines, but i use a tool that allows me to adjust the settings as I prefer
<ShaneM> I checked in a branch shane-glossary with the fixed resolveReferences method.
for now, no repository wide rules
do what you want for your spec, coordinate with other editors if needed
will bring up again when we do a version update
Next meeting is Feb 17 2016 at 1:00 pm Boston
<scribe> meeting: ARIA Editors
<scribe> Meeting: ARIA Editors
trackbot, end meeting
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.144 of Date: 2015/11/17 08:39:34 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Found embedded ScribeOptions: -final *** RESTARTING DUE TO EMBEDDED OPTIONS *** Found Scribe: MichaelC Inferring ScribeNick: MichaelC Default Present: Joanmarie_Diggs, MichaelC, Tzviya, Shane, Michiel, Matt, fesch, Joseph_Scheuhammer, JamesN Present: Joanmarie_Diggs MichaelC Tzviya Shane Michiel Matt fesch Joseph_Scheuhammer JamesN Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria-editors/2016Feb/0000.html Found Date: 03 Feb 2016 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2016/02/03-aria-editors-minutes.html People with action items: cooper WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]