17:11:58 RRSAgent has joined #aria-editors 17:11:58 logging to http://www.w3.org/2016/02/03-aria-editors-irc 17:12:00 RRSAgent, make logs world 17:12:00 Zakim has joined #aria-editors 17:12:02 Zakim, this will be 17:12:02 I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot 17:12:03 Meeting: Accessible Rich Internet Applications Working Group Teleconference 17:12:03 Date: 03 February 2016 17:12:44 agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria-editors/2016Feb/0000.html 17:12:51 chair: MichaelC 17:12:53 scribe: MichaelC 17:13:07 meeting: ARIA Editors 17:13:12 scribeOptions: -final 17:15:42 agenda+ Publication timeline check 17:15:42 agenda+ Restructuring repository repeat (see https://www.w3.org/2015/12/16-pf-editors-minutes.html#item01) 17:15:42 agenda+ Glossary stuff 17:15:42 agenda+ Horizontal rules between sections https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/228 17:15:43 agenda+ AOB 17:15:44 agenda+ Next meeting 17:33:03 agenda? 17:57:54 agendum 3 = Glossary stuff https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/106 and https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/76 18:01:43 ShaneM has joined #aria-editors 18:01:48 present+ Joanmarie_Diggs 18:02:16 present+ MichaelC, Tzviya, Shane, Michiel 18:02:24 tzviya has joined #aria-editors 18:02:31 present+ Tzviya 18:02:50 agenda? 18:03:16 zakim, next item 18:03:16 agendum 1. "Publication timeline check" taken up [from MichaelC] 18:03:57 last: https://www.w3.org/2016/01/20-aria-editors-minutes#item02 18:04:15 fesch has joined #aria-editors 18:04:32 present+ Matt 18:04:59 same as last time 18:05:03 but also add ARIA practices 18:05:22 present+ fesch 18:05:26 jamesn has joined #aria-editors 18:05:30 present+ Joseph_Scheuhammer 18:06:31 some issues in AccName might not be done, but still ok to publish 18:06:36 zakim, next item 18:06:36 agendum 2. "Restructuring repository repeat (see https://www.w3.org/2015/12/16-pf-editors-minutes.html#item01)" taken up [from MichaelC] 18:07:19 Needs a quiet time... 18:07:56 MichaelC forgot to do this in Dec 18:07:59 could do 12 Feb 18:08:03 or 19 Feb 18:08:09 or with next publication cycle if we´re all hands off 18:08:25 q+ to ask how this affects urls that currently reference the things to be moved? 18:08:34 make sure to send the hands off mail to people individually 18:10:05 let´s do at time of next heartbeat publication 18:10:31 ack next 18:10:32 clown, you wanted to ask how this affects urls that currently reference the things to be moved? 18:10:59 what about impact on rawgit URIs 18:11:36 also might cause us to look at github.io URIs 18:12:21 action: cooper to see if it´s possible to set up redirects when github resources change location 18:12:22 Created ACTION-2010 - See if it´s possible to set up redirects when github resources change location [on Michael Cooper - due 2016-02-10]. 18:12:41 ack me 18:12:53 zakim, next item 18:12:53 agendum 3. "Glossary stuff https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/106 and https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/76" taken up 18:13:29 we have common terms from which we include 18:13:40 it´s winnowed to only include terms used in that doc 18:14:07 a bug is that if I ref term A, and it refs term B but nothing else does, term B doesn´t get included though it needs to be 18:14:19 I have a fix, but don´t want to perturb anything 18:14:57 there´s enough lead time to next pub cycle that we could play with it now 18:15:31 https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/112 ? 18:15:35 SM will put in fix 18:16:15 can review rawgit of branch? yes 18:16:49 topic: Pull request vs branch 18:16:49 +1 to branches in main repo 18:17:06 Makes rebases easier too 18:17:07 Joanie suggest editing in branch in main repo, rather than in branch of private repo followed by pull request 18:17:26 people can review in the branch 18:17:27 easy to merge into master 18:17:34 find it easier than dealing with pull requests 18:18:15 it is possible to comment on lines in a pull request 18:18:24 but that may be possible on individual commits anyways 18:19:12 general consensus we prefer to use branches instead of pull requests 18:19:17 allow pulll requests for outside contributors 18:19:30 zakim, next item 18:19:30 agendum 4. "Horizontal rules between sections https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/228" taken up [from MichaelC] 18:20:02 In the ARIA spec there are
between each section 18:20:42 q+ to discuss the new stylesheet 18:20:52 suggests a thematic change, but
elements do that intrinsically 18:20:56 ack s 18:20:56 ShaneM, you wanted to discuss the new stylesheet 18:21:07 we may have had a reason before, but not clear we need it 18:21:18 the new TR CSS does this stuff for us 18:21:26 we shouldn´t add the styling 18:21:53 general consensus we can remove those 18:22:25 editors, please do for your own specs 18:22:57 zakim, next item 18:22:57 agendum 5. "AOB" taken up [from MichaelC] 18:25:19 MB has done some indent fixing in APG 18:25:47 question about line wraps 18:25:48 https://www.w3.org/2016/01/06-aria-editors-minutes.html#item05 18:27:05 some of us prefer one line per para, easier to edit text 18:27:30 others like shorter lines 18:27:51 this may be very much the preference of specific editors, so perhaps shouldn´t impose a repo-wide rule, leave it to each spec 18:27:53 https://github.com/w3c/aria/blob/master/practices/aria-practices.html 18:28:03 Sorry: https://github.com/w3c/aria/blob/master/practices/aria-practices.html#L185 18:28:15 shorter lines make diffs easier to use 18:28:27 +1 to that too - I like short lines too. 18:28:48 a middle approach is one *sentence* per line 18:29:00 +1 I like short lines, but i use a tool that allows me to adjust the settings as I prefer 18:29:43 rrsagent, make minutes 18:29:43 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/02/03-aria-editors-minutes.html MichaelC 18:30:33 I checked in a branch shane-glossary with the fixed resolveReferences method. 18:32:19 for now, no repository wide rules 18:32:30 do what you want for your spec, coordinate with other editors if needed 18:32:38 will bring up again when we do a version update 18:32:51 zakim, next item 18:32:51 agendum 6. "Next meeting" taken up [from MichaelC] 18:33:08 Next meeting is Feb 17 2016 at 1:00 pm Boston 18:33:55 present+ JamesN 18:34:11 meeting: ARIA Editors 18:34:21 rrsagent, make minutes 18:34:21 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/02/03-aria-editors-minutes.html MichaelC 18:35:28 Meeting: ARIA Editors 18:35:29 rrsagent, make minutes 18:35:29 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/02/03-aria-editors-minutes.html MichaelC 18:35:53 trackbot, end meeting 18:35:53 Zakim, list attendees 18:35:53 As of this point the attendees have been Joanmarie_Diggs, MichaelC, Tzviya, Shane, Michiel, Matt, fesch, Joseph_Scheuhammer, JamesN 18:36:01 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 18:36:01 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2016/02/03-aria-editors-minutes.html trackbot 18:36:02 RRSAgent, bye 18:36:02 I see 1 open action item saved in http://www.w3.org/2016/02/03-aria-editors-actions.rdf : 18:36:02 ACTION: cooper to see if it´s possible to set up redirects when github resources change location [1] 18:36:02 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2016/02/03-aria-editors-irc#T18-12-21