See also: IRC log
<scribe> scribe: clapierre
title: Accessibility DPUB Task Force Weekly Meeting
Action Items. George to provided Link to Logical Reading Order http://www.idpf.org/accessibility/guidelines/content/semantics/order.php
This is done.
1 B) Tzviya added section accessibility of multiple documents in a package: https://github.com/w3c/dpub-accessibility/commit/3e1cddfceffc080283df26f14bbe5cfd8184af09
This is Done
1 C) Charles discussed Assessment with Markku Hakkinen from ETS
this is done and added to the Note
1 D) add to the Future work section about the baseline and difficulty.
Not yet done.
Mia: I have done my work on
pagination and sent it to Kathy.
... , waiting for her feedback.
Deborah: I am still doing some
wordsmitting and need to link to our work on WCAG gap analysis
we did
... , we need an ACTION item for linking to the WCAG Gap
analysis.
charles: I will be presenting this Note to the IDPF meeting in Baltimore next month.
Deborah: Add to the Agenda: How should we organize the priorities in this Note.
Charles: gave overview of the current status of the Note.
Deborah: we are just about all
done. We are at the point where only if people bring up new
items. We should have a use case for everything in section #2
(things we would like) I think we shouldn't delay on
things.
... , We may be at the point where if people think we are
missing anything we can just get them to add whatever might be
missing. Unless anything is left on our plate we are pretty
much done.
Tzviya: keep in mind we don't need to make it W3C spec since this is just a Note and should be comprehensive don't worry about MUSTS and SHOULDS.
Charles: Mia will converse with Kathy and get Charles the data to add to the note.
<tzviya> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/media-a11y-reqs/
Charles: should we try to model this?
Tzviya: we can use this as a reference but we don't have to.
Deborah: we are modeling our Note from the Mobile Accessibility Note.
Charles: does it make sense to show Ivan?
Deborah: once we have pagination
and the gap analysis we can show Ivan.
... , I think the basic structure of what we have is fine. once
we have both the missing pieces then we can show Ivan.
Tzviya: we need to make sure we are communicating things clearly and what is our message.
Deborah: I will add an audience
section. Our audience for this text is People in responsible
for W3C guidelines and specifications especially a11y
ones.
... , agree?
All: Yes
charles: for WCAG gap analysis can we just link to a google spreadsheet?
Deborah: do we have to do a translation to a wiki or doc?
Tzviya: we will need to ask Ivan.
Charles: I will send Ivan the question with links to our google docs to see what he thinks.
Tzviya: ATAG has disbanded, so we can't really say in our note that ATAG should make modifications that we need in DPUB.
Deborah: Is UAG still alive?
Tzviya: IndiUi the work there is shifting to other Way groups, but is dormant since there are other priorities,.
Mia: we do call out ATAG.
Deborah: we need to hear from Shawn and Michael Cooper….
Tzviya: UAG is alive.
... , UAG wrote a note in Dec.
<tzviya> https://www.w3.org/TR/UAAG20/
Deborah: I have a proposal and will send it shortly. List this by priority and good functional way to do it. we may want to organize it by which group should work on it. but in light of what is going on maybe not.
<clapierre1> … My proposal would be to navigate among multiple documents. Add discussion to it.
<clapierre1> …, The next two important is skip-ability / escapability. This is a big Screen Reader problem. After that I could be any order. Page #'s would be next, then phonetic spelling. DropCap would be last.
<clapierre1> Tzviya: we may want to get broader feedback on the order from entire dpub.
<clapierre1> Deborah: Does anyone have any strong feelings of priority?
<clapierre1> Charles: Send out the priority and we can discuss this.
<clapierre1> Tzviya: We can add this as a topic to DPUB meeting for Feb 1.
<clapierre1> Charles: will reach out after the meeting to Ivan to ask him to review the document and ask the google doc question.
<clapierre1> Deborah: if you are comfortable we can add pagination work you did in now and we may tweak it with Kathys feedback.
<clapierre1> Mia: I can send that text to Charles.
<clapierre1> Tzviya: Ivan may do this over the weekend.
<clapierre1> Deborah: I have my priority work changes and will check that in shortly
<clapierre1> Tzviya: we can put a place holder in for the WCAG gap analysis work.
<clapierre1> Deborah: I will do that before I submit that today
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.144 of Date: 2015/11/17 08:39:34 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Found Scribe: clapierre Inferring ScribeNick: clapierre Present: Deborah_Kaplan Charles_LaPierre Tzviya Mia Regrets: George Kerscher WARNING: No meeting title found! You should specify the meeting title like this: <dbooth> Meeting: Weekly Baking Club Meeting Got date from IRC log name: 22 Jan 2016 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2016/01/22-dpub-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]