W3C

- DRAFT -

SV_MEETING_TITLE

04 Jan 2016

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Rich_Schwerdtfeger
Regrets
Anthony_Doran, E.A._Draffan, Deborah_Dahl, ayelet_seeman
Chair
Lisa_Seeman
Scribe
JohnRochford

Contents


<Lisa_Seeman> agenda: this

<Lisa_Seeman> scribe: JohnRochford

<Lisa_Seeman> next item

Lisa: Kurt, how about a 2-minute introduction?
... Kurt, your audio is not working.
... Kurt is reviewing techniques document(s).

<Kurt> Not sure why you cannot hear me, trying to rejoin the call

<Lisa_Seeman> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/wiki/Main_Page#What_are_we_working_on_now.3F

Lisa: We have 3 weeks to finalize work: gap analysis and issue papers
... We need to do gap analysis summary and table
... 3 members of gap-analysis summary team: John, MaryJo, Lisa
... Kurt will be working on gap analysis table with other team members
... There will be a freeze at the end of this month.
... Michael, Neil, and Lisa are working on getting an ARIA extension for COGA

John: Lisa may have meant Mike, not Michael.

<Lisa_Seeman> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/wiki/Gap_Analysis_Summary#Setting_and_gathering_preferences

<Lisa_Seeman> ACTION: kurt to join subgroup on gap analysis table [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2016/01/04-coga-minutes.html#action01]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-147 - Join subgroup on gap analysis table [on Kurt Mattes - due 2016-01-11].

<Lisa_Seeman> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/wiki/Gap_Analysis_Summary#Setting_and_gathering_preferences

<Lisa_Seeman> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/wiki/Gap_Analysis_Summary

<Lisa_Seeman> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/wiki/Proposal_for_WCAG

Lisa: It would be good if Janina, Michael, and Rich could review the gap analysis summary, to which she just posted the link.

<Lisa_Seeman> ACTION: rich and Janina to look at gap analysis summary for initial review [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2016/01/04-coga-minutes.html#action02]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-148 - And janina to look at gap analysis summary for initial review [on Richard Schwerdtfeger - due 2016-01-11].

Janina: Should we have solutions in the gap analysis summary?
... The gap analysis should be to explain (exclusiviely) what the problems are.

+1 to Janina's observation

Janina: My comments are based upon the table of contents. I will read the entire doc before commenting further.

<Lisa_Seeman> next item

<Kurt> Sorry, I need to drop - will tend to the action item no later than tomorrow

<Lisa_Seeman> next item

Michael (to Lisa): You should complete the joining process for the chairs working group.

Correction: the WCAG working group

Lisa: Once I join the WCAG working group, I will ask for COGA-related feedback.

<Lisa_Seeman> next item:

<Lisa_Seeman> next item

Lisa: Metadate issue paper is week. Any volunteers to review it?

Correction: metadata

<Lisa_Seeman> next item

Correction: weak, not week

Lisa to Michael: Is there time to consider an event at CSUN?

Michael: A solid decision needs to be made within the next 2 weeks.
... We may want to wait until Lisbon event.

John: Clarification: event = face-to-face meeting

Lisa: September would be a good time for a FTF.
... We really should have a FTF in Lisbon. We need to coordinate with other working groups.
... Lisbon will be good for ARIA, HTML, CSS.

<Mike_Pluke> +1

Lisa: Everyone agree to meeting in Lisbon?

<Lisa_Seeman> libon ftf +1

+1

<Chaohai_Ding> +1

RESOLUTION: we should have a ftf in lisbon

Rich: If you want a FTF before Lisbon in September, you should consider the timing of the other working groups.
... If you think waiting to September is slowing us down, we should have a meeting sooner.
... We could meet in Austin.

John: I thought we had already agreed to meeting in Austin.

Lisa: We could meet, in Austin, at SXSW.
... I will set up a straw poll or something similar to solicit votes about FTF meetings.

Michael: If we are asking people to use their travel budgets, we need to be sure we have a good reason to have a FTF.

John: If we want a meeting in Boston, I can work on hosting possibilities.

RESOLUTION: lisa to set up poll for next ftf

Summary of Action Items

[NEW] ACTION: kurt to join subgroup on gap analysis table [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2016/01/04-coga-minutes.html#action01]
[NEW] ACTION: rich and Janina to look at gap analysis summary for initial review [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2016/01/04-coga-minutes.html#action02]
 

Summary of Resolutions

  1. we should have a ftf in lisbon
  2. lisa to set up poll for next ftf
[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.144 (CVS log)
$Date: 2016/01/04 18:05:17 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.144  of Date: 2015/11/17 08:39:34  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Found Scribe: JohnRochford
Inferring ScribeNick: JohnRochford

WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found.

Present: Rich_Schwerdtfeger

WARNING: Fewer than 3 people found for Present list!

Regrets: Anthony_Doran E.A._Draffan Deborah_Dahl ayelet_seeman

WARNING: No meeting title found!
You should specify the meeting title like this:
<dbooth> Meeting: Weekly Baking Club Meeting

Got date from IRC log name: 04 Jan 2016
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2016/01/04-coga-minutes.html
People with action items: janina kurt rich

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.


WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found!  
Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>.

Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of 
new discussion topics or agenda items, such as:
<dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report


[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]