See also: IRC log
<Lisa_Seeman> agenda: this
<Tony_Doran> Hi - What is the password for webex ?
<Lisa_Seeman> i told you on the private chat
<Lisa_Seeman> ok?
<Lisa_Seeman> scribe ddahl
<Lisa_Seeman> scribe: ddahl
lisa: would like to get a user
research group on depression and anxiety
... using expertise
... from Renaldo Barnard
... based at Southhampton University
... are others agreable to this?
EA: also he's working in epidemiology
<Lisa_Seeman> passed -to open an user reserch module on anxity and depresion
<Lisa_Seeman> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/track/actions/open
EA: want to take advantage of this opportunity
topic; actions
s/topic;actions//
action-138?
<trackbot> action-138 -- E.A. Draffan to Add points from her to issue papers such as adding to multi modal the issue to go back to the last point, index and have deviders. what makes audio and vidie useable -- due 2015-10-09 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/track/actions/138
lisa: if github is a problem send
an email
... in video people sometimes need to go back so an index would
be useful
ea: queue and review
lisa: the student population
would love this
... ea should get version from github
ea: will send it to you for review
action-139?
<trackbot> action-139 -- Deborah Dahl to Add updates form conversation to voice and menu systems -- due 2015-10-09 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/track/actions/139
debbie: not this week
action-140?
<trackbot> action-140 -- Lisa Seeman to Add to gap analisis more work needed looking into menus and voice for limited speach with natrial languge -- due 2015-10-09 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/track/actions/140
lisa: will leave that open
action-141?
<trackbot> action-141 -- Lisa Seeman to Check these are the two issues that group wants from us -- due 2015-11-09 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/track/actions/141
<Lisa_Seeman> https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/gap-analysis/table.html
lisa: would like to look at the
table
... and make sure that people are ok with it so far
(lisa reviews table)
lisa: "user needs" column has
some headers that group different user needs
... into categories
... do we think that this table does the job
... should it be more like a user story or like
requirements?
... we should come back after we have a few rows filled in
janina: I don't think a table is
enough by itself, it's useful, but on its own it's not
enough
... it's important to introduce different kinds of cognitive
issues
... narrative paragraphs should introduce what people with
these issues face
lisa: this will link to the right sections of the user research document
janina: need to distill further into a single document or it will be too much for people
lisa: we were concerned about rewriting content in user research and issue papers
janina: we need to get this into
a succinct document
... for example like work on media accessibility
lisa: it would be taking all the issue papers and put them in one document
janina: summarize issue paper into one succinct document
lisa: then we won't have the user needs
<janina> Suggested to use MAUR as Gap Analysis example:
<janina> http://w3c.github.io/pfwg/media-accessibility-reqs/
lisa: three options -- continue table, summarize issue papers and techniques, do both
mike: what does "about the user"
mean?
... should put that next to "user needs"
lisa: there will be links to where that's discussed in the user research
<Zakim> janina, you wanted to say that this group must explain the gaps, but can leave the solutions for later
mike: a lot of user needs involve
particular problems more than other people
... this woud help with success criteria
debbie: just wanted to ask about what the scope of the summary would be, how long
janina: MAUR is about 15-17
pages
... people might not want to get into the deep information at
first
<Zakim> ddahl, you wanted to ask how long the summary would be?
lisa: perhaps we could make 3 minute videos of users talking about their needs
<ddahl_> scribe:ddahl_
lisa: table would make the points
more rigorous
... three proposals, table, summary, both
... table would be large
ea: that's a problem with the table
<Tony_Doran> A table would be my preference.
lisa: you can break user needs into a table
debbie: would lean toward a summary and maybe a condensed table
mike: a summary is needed, the background could be in a table
ea: +1 to that
... the summary is essential, maybe could be condensed
further
... table should avoid vertical and horizontal scrolling
lisa: people are voting for both, with a preference for a summary
<Mike_Pluke> both - sorry!
lisa: vote for one of the three proposals
both
<EA> both
<janina> both, I regret
lisa: maybe after we do the summary the table won't be necessary
<Tony_Doran> Both is ideal but much more work....agree tables can be hard to follow. I hadn't considered that. As a dev, I like tables :)
janina: the table is more useful for developers
lisa: should we work on the summary first?
mike: it would speed things up to
do the summary first. people trying to assess the work would
like to get a summary
... it would be more valuable for socialization
janina: my reason for the summary is so that people can understand the nature of the problem before getting involved in the technology
lisa: the table was requested
janina: maybe need another call to clarify people's understanding
lisa: they wanted to see the user needs to see if this could be moved to somewhere else
janina: for the nuts and bolts
you need the table
... but there's a good part of the community that's not up to
speed and they need to be brought along
lisa: sounds like everyone feels we need both
<Tony_Doran> I need to drop off. You have my preference ;)
lisa: do we need to bounce this off of other people
ea: we have two levels of expertise, developer and more service provider
lisa: we might need an overview but it doesn't need to be 16-17 pages
ea: will everyone be ok with a table?
janina: let's check with the two parent wg's
<Lisa_Seeman> ACTION: lisa table or summary or both - ask both parent wg and judy [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2015/11/23-coga-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-145 - Table or summary or both - ask both parent wg and judy [on Lisa Seeman - due 2015-11-30].
janina: also include Judy
<EA> So sorry must go. Many thanks
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.144 of Date: 2015/11/17 08:39:34 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) FAILED: s/topic;actions// Succeeded: s/categoies/categories/ Succeeded: s/documen/document/ Succeeded: s/others/other people/ Succeeded: s/general person/service provider/ Found Scribe: ddahl Inferring ScribeNick: ddahl Found Scribe: ddahl_ Inferring ScribeNick: ddahl_ Scribes: ddahl, ddahl_ ScribeNicks: ddahl, ddahl_ Present: MichaelC janina debbie Regrets: John_Rochford Steve_Lee Chaohai_Ding Ayelet_seeman Got date from IRC log name: 23 Nov 2015 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2015/11/23-coga-minutes.html People with action items: lisa[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]