Warning:
This wiki has been archived and is now read-only.
Meetings:Telecon2015.06.11
From RDF Data Shapes Working Group
Thursday at 2pm US Eastern time for 90 minutes Beware US and Europe Daylight Saving Time in effect check your timezone: -- http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converted.html?msg=RDF+Data+Shapes+meeting&iso=20150604T11&p1=224&p2=43&p3=195&p4=26&p5=240 ** WebEx ** (for audio): https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=m3f7be74bc0d7a0abf0405fe5661ee163 Meeting number: 640 811 616 IRC channel: #shapes on irc.w3.org on port 6665 To start meeting: trackbot, start meeting Zakim instructions: http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html RRSAgent instructions: http://www.w3.org/2002/03/RRSAgent
Contents
Admin
- Chair: Arnaud
- Scribe: Bart van Leeuwen, or Michel Dumontier, or first available on the scribe list.
Minutes of last meeting
PROPOSED: Approve minutes of the 4 June Telecon: http://www.w3.org/2015/06/04-shapes-minutes.html
Next meeting
- Teleconf 2015.06.18
Next F2F meeting
- PROPOSED: Based on Doodle Poll the F2F4 in Lille will take place on September 8-10, 2015.
Tracking of actions & issues
SHACL Formal Definition (ACTION-27)
SHACL Issues
- Dispose of ISSUE-66: SHACL should not be ill-founded
- PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-60: Shall SHACL support other extension languages beside SPARQL (like JavaScript)? saying yes, even though we may not define any such extension at this point, the design should allow it.
- Discuss ISSUE-47: Can SPARQL-based constraints access the shape graph, and how?
- Discuss ISSUE-1: What inferencing can or must be used?
- Discuss ISSUE-61: Direction of individual scoping: sh:nodeShape vs. sh:individualScope
- Discuss ISSUE-65: A consistent and cohesive definition of shapes, scopes, and constraints
- SHACL Editor's draft
