ISSUE-60: Shall SHACL support other extension languages beside SPARQL (like JavaScript)?
Other Extension Languages
Shall SHACL support other extension languages beside SPARQL (like JavaScript)?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- SHACL Spec
- Raised by:
- Holger Knublauch
- Opened on:
- 2015-05-30
- Description:
- We have frequently discussed that there could be other extension languages beside SPARQL, but I don't think we ever formally closed this topic. The current spec would allow other languages such as JavaScript, identified through some property such as shjs:js. My impression from discussions in the WG was that most people would be in favour of allowing this flexibility, but I believe Peter was against that. In any case, we need a resolution.
Once we do that, we could discuss whether we also want to do a JavaScript deliverable as part of the WG, but that would be a separate ticket. - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: ISSUE-131: Proposal to close (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2016-10-13)
- Re: review of SHACL document (Second pass of responses) (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-09-03)
- Merge of ISSUE-62 completed, including new draft for Execution Languages interface (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-07-17)
- Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 11 June 2015 (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2015-06-10)
- Re: tracker not tracking emails to the working group mailing list (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2015-06-08)
- Re: tracker not tracking emails to the working group mailing list (from lehors@us.ibm.com on 2015-06-08)
- Re: tracker not tracking emails to the working group mailing list (from lehors@us.ibm.com on 2015-06-03)
- tracker not tracking emails to the working group mailing list (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2015-06-03)
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-60 (Other Extension Languages): Shall SHACL support other extension languages beside SPARQL (like JavaScript)? [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-06-02)
- Re: implementing today's resolution (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-06-02)
- Re: [an aside on JavaScript] Re: shapes-ISSUE-60 (Other Extension Languages): Shall SHACL support other extension languages beside SPARQL (like JavaScript)? [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-06-02)
- [an aside on JavaScript] Re: shapes-ISSUE-60 (Other Extension Languages): Shall SHACL support other extension languages beside SPARQL (like JavaScript)? [SHACL Spec] (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2015-06-01)
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-60 (Other Extension Languages): Shall SHACL support other extension languages beside SPARQL (like JavaScript)? [SHACL Spec] (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2015-06-01)
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-60 (Other Extension Languages): Shall SHACL support other extension languages beside SPARQL (like JavaScript)? [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-06-01)
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-60 (Other Extension Languages): Shall SHACL support other extension languages beside SPARQL (like JavaScript)? [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-05-31)
- RE: shapes-ISSUE-60 (Other Extension Languages): Shall SHACL support other extension languages beside SPARQL (like JavaScript)? [SHACL Spec] (from Simon.Cox@csiro.au on 2015-05-31)
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-60 (Other Extension Languages): Shall SHACL support other extension languages beside SPARQL (like JavaScript)? [SHACL Spec] (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2015-05-31)
- shapes-ISSUE-60 (Other Extension Languages): Shall SHACL support other extension languages beside SPARQL (like JavaScript)? [SHACL Spec] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2015-05-30)
- Re: multiple value shape? (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-05-30)
- Re: multiple value shape? (from irene@topquadrant.com on 2015-05-29)
Related notes:
There are several emails related to this issue that have not been linked here.
Peter Patel-Schneider, 3 Jun 2015, 20:22:46Resolution: yes, even though we may not define any such extension at this point, the design should allow it.
See http://www.w3.org/2015/06/11-shapes-minutes.html#resolution03
Display change log
