See also: IRC log
http://www.w3.org/2013/share-psi/workshop/lisbon/agenda
phila: We need to promote
Andre: We have lots of mailing lists etc.
Noel: We promoted the Open data day here and got 250 people
phila: Yes, I'll promote it through W3C as well
Need to ask ODI and OKFN
PR: There was some confusion
about the consortium agreement
... there has been some discussion about the terms
... we have integrated all comments and we think we have the
final version
... I just wanted to give people a few days to look
... I don't really want to reopen the discussion
... ideally it needs to be signed by everyone before the
review
... we need to show that we have the majority of signatures
then it's a good start
... I don't want to walk into the review without that
... we have a contractual agreement with the EC and the other
is with each other
johann: The last section of the agreement is the one that needs to be signed. Just signed and scanned is what's needed
phila: Do we need to think about Krems yet?
Johann: No, it's all announced
and planned
... my worry is that it's only 2 months after Romania
Noel: What's the focus for Krems
Johann: The focus for CeDEM is
open data, openness in general
... we already have some papers on that topic
... processes, formats, legal aspects
... Dates are 20 - 22 May
... we announced Share-PSI as 20-21 May
... We're more focussed towards public sector, but the topic in
the agenda is fine
... People may be interested in how to get there. We'll arrange
buses from Vienna airport
... there is a train to nearby too
... so it shouldn't be too hard
... lots of info on this on the conference website
So project meeting on 20th, workshop 21-22
Johann: I'm grateful that Lisbon is laying the way for the style
phila: What have we done badly?
PR: We have 4 deliverables to provide, due end November: Periodic report, dissemination report, Best Practices doc and Timisoara CfP
PR: one of them is the Best practice document. That's something we have to prepare a message about
muriel: Do we have people to add
on top of our own members in Lisbon?
... so we can show that we have addressed the weakness in
Samos?
... If so then we can demonstrate that we have acted on
that?
... the 2nd thing they're expecting is the standardisation work
- but you have your case
... the first thing they will look at is the table of
indicators
We need to look at the indicators
Makx: we need to demonstrate that this work in progress
phila: I had forgotten that table exists
Muriel: Outside the table of indicators you can discuss, everything outside the deliverables you can discuss
Makx: I agree with what Muriel
said
... also what is interesting that the coordinator how the
intended impact is going to be reached
... the PIs can be talked about in numbers, but what matters
for a review is the influence the impact that the project is
going to have
Noel: The impact on what?
Makx: The project has an impact
section - we have to look at that and comment. That reminds the
reviewers what we said we'd do
... that's an improtant contribution.
... It's good if projects give you info that is relevant. Is it
going well? Is it going where it should? Reviewers shouldn't
have to probe too much
Important to have a story with each Indicator, what we're going to do etc.
phila: Shows the agenda for the review
PR: The agenda implies that people need to prepare presentations before hand on a uSB
phila: I'm concerned that the topic is too narrow
Daniel: We'll have a hackathon
the w/e before
... the ws is the Mon and Tue, the hackathon will be a Sat and
Sun
... so we can have the open data movement there from
Romania
phila: So can we build on the hackathon with sessions on what the developers want
Daniel: Share-PSI folks can
participate in the hackathon, make presentations etc.
... we can make it more an event
Valentina: We can promote the
session in Serbia
... and we have an event the week before
... 8-11 March and we'll promote the workshop before
Daniel: We also discussed with
public authorities here on who can they mobilise to get to
Timisoara to get to the workshop
... I'll do more of that, getting people from Bucharest
Makx: I was at the Europerana meeting last week talking to someone from Romania - he seemed interested in the event
Daniel: I know him so can contact him
Muriel: I'm coming back with my
same ideas. In Lisbon we'll have Finodex distributing money to
SMEs. The last call had >=1 proposal that should have gone
through in Marta's unit
... to the pretty much the same thing
... they will prob have calls
... we can contact these people
Amanda: We have the incubator that Muriel is talking about so we can do that
Topic for Timisoara we have Identifying high value data sets, Something from the hackathon, and feedback loops
Peter: Log file analysis is
important. Do we have any connection with Citdel on the Move
project?
... they have mechanisms for turning data into mobile
Apps
... that's a good example of micro level
Noel: Yes, we could do something around Citdel on the Move
peterw: I think it would be good as we keep talling about big sets, but small ones can be high value locally
Noel: That's something that we can present
peterw: That might be from a
small spreadhseet through to a mobile app
... dealing with the data and getting something into the app
store for visbility
Noel: That's what has happened in Ghent
http://www.opendataforum.info/index.php/news2/open-data-nieuws
www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXLzASiSEZk
Daniel: I'll talk to the open data foundation in Romania and come up with some ideas
The sooner the better please