10:06:54 RRSAgent has joined #dwbp 10:06:54 logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/11/06-dwbp-irc 10:07:01 rrsagent, make logs public 10:07:57 http://www.w3.org/2013/share-psi/workshop/lisbon/agenda 10:10:11 phila: We need to promote 10:11:28 Andre: We have lots of mailing lists etc. 10:11:40 Noel: We promoted the Open data day here and got 250 people 10:11:55 phila: Yes, I'll promote it through W3C as well 10:12:11 Lorenzo-canova has joined #dwbp 10:12:40 Need to ask ODI and OKFN 10:14:15 PR: There was some confusion about the consortium agreement 10:14:22 ... there has been some discussion about the terms 10:14:36 ... we have integrated all comments and we think we have the final version 10:14:46 ... I just wanted to give people a few days to look 10:14:58 ... I don't really want to reopen the discussion 10:15:08 ... ideally it needs to be signed by everyone before the review 10:15:18 ... we need to show that we have the majority of signatures then it's a good start 10:15:30 ... I don't want to walk into the review without that 10:16:10 ... we have a contractual agreement with the EC and the other is with each other 10:20:25 johann: The last section of the agreement is the one that needs to be signed. Just signed and scanned is what's needed 10:23:54 phila: Do we need to think about Krems yet? 10:24:07 Johann: No, it's all announced and planned 10:24:17 .. my worry is that it's only 2 months after ROmania 10:24:45 Noel: What's the focu for Krems 10:25:01 Johann: The focus for CeDEM is open data, openness in general 10:25:09 ... we already have some papers on that topic 10:25:15 ... processes, formats, legal aspects 10:25:38 Johann: Dates are 20 - 22 May 10:25:49 ... we announced Share-PSI as 20-21 May 10:27:26 Johann: We're more focussed towards public sector, but the topic in the agenda is fine 10:27:46 ... People may be interested in how to get there. We'll arrange buses from Vienna airport 10:27:53 ... there is a train to nearby too 10:27:57 ... so it shouldn't be too hard 10:28:06 ... lots of info on this on the conference website 10:30:08 So project meeting on 20th, workshop 21-22 10:30:51 Johann: I'm grateful that Lisbon is laying the way for the style 10:31:22 -phila 10:31:50 -Makx 10:31:58 +[IPcaller] 10:32:05 zakim, ipcaller is me 10:32:05 +phila; got it 10:32:56 Topic: Review 10:33:09 phila: What have we done badly? 10:33:19 PR: WE have 3 deliverables to provide, due end November 10:33:34 retruing 10:33:36 ... one of them is the Best practice document. That's something we have to prepare a message about 10:37:53 Makx has joined #dwbp 10:39:07 Makx Can you jump on skype 10:39:31 muriel: Do we have people to add on top of our own members in Lisbon? 10:39:42 ... so we can show that we have addressed the weakness in Samos? 10:39:52 ... If so then we can demonstrate that we have acted on that? 10:40:04 ... the 2nd thing they're expecting is the standardisation work - but you have your case 10:40:15 ... the first thing they will look at is the table of indicators 10:40:59 We need to look at the indicators 10:41:20 ... we need to demonstrate that this work in progress 10:41:45 phila: I had forgotten that table exists 10:42:14 Muriel: Outside the table of indicators you can discuss, everything outside the deliverables you can discuss 10:42:48 Makx: I agree with what Muriel said 10:43:06 ... also what is interesting that the coordinator how the intended impact is going to be reached 10:43:26 ... the PIs can be talked about in numbers, but what matters for a review is the influence the impact that the project is going to have 10:43:34 Noel: The impact on what? 10:44:00 Makx: The project has an impact section - we have to look at that and comment. That reminds the reviewers what we said we'd do 10:44:14 ... that's an improtant contribution. 10:44:37 ... It's good if projects give you info that is relevant. Is it going well? Is it going where it should? Reviewers shouldn't have to probe too much 10:45:24 Important to have a story with each Indicator, what we're going to do etc. 10:46:38 + +322710aaee 10:48:23 phila: Shows the agenda for the review 10:49:05 PR: The agenda implies that people need to prepare presentations before hand on a uSB 10:54:09 - +322710aabb 10:56:41 Topic: Timisoara 10:56:52 phila: I'm concerned that the topic is too narrow 10:57:02 Daniel: We'll have a hackathon the w/e before 10:57:16 ... the ws is the Mon and Tue, the hackathon will be a Sat and Sun 10:57:27 ... so we can have the open data movement there from Romania 10:58:40 phila: So can we build on the hackathon with sessions on what the developers want 10:58:55 Daniel: Share-PSI folks can participate in the hackathon, make presentations etc. 10:59:08 ... we can make it more an event 10:59:18 Valentina: We can promote the session in Serbia 10:59:28 ... and we have an event the week before 10:59:39 ... 8-11 March and we'll promote the workshop before 11:00:14 Daniel: We also discussed with public authorities here on who can they mobilise to get to Timisoara to get to the workshop 11:00:20 ... I'll do more of that, getting people from Bucharest 11:00:52 Makx: I was at the Europerana meeting last week talking to someone from Romania - he seemed interested in the event 11:01:08 Daniel: I know him so can contact him 11:02:20 Muriel: I'm coming back with my same ideas. In Lisbon we'll have Finodex distributing money to SMEs. The last call had >=1 proposal that should have gone through in Marta's unit 11:02:26 ... to the pretty much the same thing 11:02:33 ... they will prob have calls 11:02:39 ... we can contact these people 11:03:22 Amanda: We have the incubator that Muriel is talking about so we can do that 11:04:58 Topic for Timisoara we have Identifying high value data sets, Something from the hackathon, and feedback loops 11:05:36 Peter: Log file analysis is important. Do we have any connection with Citdel on the Move project? 11:05:47 ... they have mechanisms for turning data into mobile Apps 11:06:10 ... that's a good example of micro level 11:06:32 Noel: Yes, we could do something around Citdel on the Move 11:06:54 peterw: I think it would be good as we keep talling about big sets, but small ones can be high value locally 11:07:03 Noel: That's something that we can present 11:07:17 peterw: That might be from a small spreadhseet through to a mobile app 11:07:35 ... dealing with the data and getting something into the app store for visbility 11:07:45 Noel: That's what has happened in Ghent 11:08:04 http://www.opendataforum.info/index.php/news2/open-data-nieuws 11:08:45 www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXLzASiSEZk 11:09:03 Daniel: I'll talk to the open data foundation in Romania and come up with some ideas 11:10:24 - +322710aaee 11:10:30 Topic: Periodic reports 11:11:36 The sooner the better please 11:12:20 -phila 11:12:22 - +43.198.11aacc 11:12:26 - +39.011.090.aadd 11:12:27 Team_(dwbp)09:57Z has ended 11:12:27 Attendees were +3247388aaaa, +322710aabb, phila, +43.198.11aacc, +39.011.090.aadd, Makx, +322710aaee 11:12:41 RRSAgent, draft minutes 11:12:41 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/11/06-dwbp-minutes.html phila 11:12:56 Meeting: Share-PSI project meeting 11:13:00 chair: PhilA 11:15:08 Present+ Amanda, Andras, Andre, Daniel, Harris, Ingo, Johann, Jan, Makx, Martin, Muriel, Noel, Pascale, PeterW, Philippe, Steinar, Valentina, Georg, Lorenzo 11:15:27 regrets+ Neven, PeterP 11:15:32 RRSAgent, generate minutes 11:15:32 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/11/06-dwbp-minutes.html phila 13:02:33 zakim, bye 13:02:33 Zakim has left #dwbp 13:02:38 RRSAgent, bye 13:02:38 I see no action items