14:57:27 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/12/03-ldp-irc
RRSAgent IRC Bot: logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/12/03-ldp-irc ←
14:57:29 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs public
Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, make logs public ←
14:57:31 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be LDP
Trackbot IRC Bot: Zakim, this will be LDP ←
14:57:31 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see SW_LDP()10:00AM scheduled to start in 3 minutes
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, trackbot; I see SW_LDP()10:00AM scheduled to start in 3 minutes ←
14:57:32 <trackbot> Meeting: Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Teleconference
14:57:32 <trackbot> Date: 03 December 2012
14:58:00 <Zakim> SW_LDP()10:00AM has now started
Zakim IRC Bot: SW_LDP()10:00AM has now started ←
14:58:06 <Zakim> +Ruben
Zakim IRC Bot: +Ruben ←
14:58:43 <Yves> regrets for me, on another call
Yves Lafon: regrets for me, on another call ←
15:00:02 <Zakim> +[IBM]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IBM] ←
15:00:13 <Zakim> +Arnaud
Zakim IRC Bot: +Arnaud ←
15:00:16 <SteveS> Zakim, [IBM] is me
Steve Speicher: Zakim, [IBM] is me ←
15:00:16 <Zakim> +SteveS; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +SteveS; got it ←
15:00:32 <Zakim> +OpenLink_Software
Zakim IRC Bot: +OpenLink_Software ←
15:00:40 <MacTed> Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me ←
15:00:40 <Zakim> +MacTed; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +MacTed; got it ←
15:00:41 <MacTed> Zakim, mute me
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, mute me ←
15:00:41 <Zakim> MacTed should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: MacTed should now be muted ←
15:01:20 <Zakim> +??P3
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P3 ←
15:01:32 <Zakim> -??P3
Zakim IRC Bot: -??P3 ←
15:01:54 <Zakim> +Ashok_Malhotra
Zakim IRC Bot: +Ashok_Malhotra ←
15:02:14 <Zakim> +??P39
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P39 ←
15:02:21 <BartvanLeeuwen> Zakim, ??P39 is me
Bart van Leeuwen: Zakim, ??P39 is me ←
15:02:21 <Zakim> +BartvanLeeuwen; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +BartvanLeeuwen; got it ←
15:02:26 <MacTed> Zakim, who's here?
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, who's here? ←
15:02:26 <Zakim> On the phone I see Ruben, SteveS, Arnaud, MacTed (muted), Ashok_Malhotra, BartvanLeeuwen
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see Ruben, SteveS, Arnaud, MacTed (muted), Ashok_Malhotra, BartvanLeeuwen ←
15:02:28 <Zakim> On IRC I see Ashok_Malhotra, Ruben1, Zakim, RRSAgent, stevebattle, BartvanLeeuwen, bhyland, deiu, MacTed, SteveS, AndyS, webr3, gavinc, Arnaud, sandro, Yves, trackbot
Zakim IRC Bot: On IRC I see Ashok_Malhotra, Ruben1, Zakim, RRSAgent, stevebattle, BartvanLeeuwen, bhyland, deiu, MacTed, SteveS, AndyS, webr3, gavinc, Arnaud, sandro, Yves, trackbot ←
15:03:03 <AndyS> Partial apologies - IRC only at the moment.
Andy Seaborne: Partial apologies - IRC only at the moment. ←
15:03:40 <Zakim> + +44.208.573.aaaa
Zakim IRC Bot: + +44.208.573.aaaa ←
15:04:04 <Arnaud> andy, we've got 3 issues pending review for you
Arnaud Le Hors: andy, we've got 3 issues pending review for you ←
15:04:09 <Arnaud> have you seen this?
Arnaud Le Hors: have you seen this? ←
15:04:25 <Zakim> +[GVoice]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[GVoice] ←
15:04:44 <Zakim> +Sandro
Zakim IRC Bot: +Sandro ←
15:05:34 <Arnaud> zakim, who's here?
Arnaud Le Hors: zakim, who's here? ←
15:05:34 <Zakim> On the phone I see Ruben, SteveS, Arnaud, MacTed (muted), Ashok_Malhotra, BartvanLeeuwen, +44.208.573.aaaa, ericP, Sandro
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see Ruben, SteveS, Arnaud, MacTed (muted), Ashok_Malhotra, BartvanLeeuwen, +44.208.573.aaaa, ericP, Sandro ←
15:05:36 <Zakim> On IRC I see rogerm, ericP, Ashok_Malhotra, Ruben1, Zakim, RRSAgent, stevebattle, BartvanLeeuwen, bhyland, deiu, MacTed, SteveS, AndyS, webr3, gavinc, Arnaud, sandro, Yves,
Zakim IRC Bot: On IRC I see rogerm, ericP, Ashok_Malhotra, Ruben1, Zakim, RRSAgent, stevebattle, BartvanLeeuwen, bhyland, deiu, MacTed, SteveS, AndyS, webr3, gavinc, Arnaud, sandro, Yves, ←
15:05:36 <Zakim> ... trackbot
Zakim IRC Bot: ... trackbot ←
15:06:27 <MacTed> Zakim. aaaa is rogerm
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim. aaaa is rogerm ←
15:06:38 <MacTed> Zakim, aaaa is rogerm
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, aaaa is rogerm ←
15:06:39 <Zakim> +rogerm; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +rogerm; got it ←
15:06:41 <MacTed> :-)
Ted Thibodeau: :-) ←
15:06:54 <AndyS> Arnaud - numbers? pointers? I see 15 and 36 as open. No actions outstanding.
Andy Seaborne: Arnaud - numbers? pointers? I see 15 and 36 as open. No actions outstanding. ←
15:07:01 <Arnaud> chair: Arnaud
15:07:01 <Arnaud> scribe: rogerm
(Scribe set to Roger Menday)
<rogerm> topic: Minutes of 26 November 2012
<rogerm> Arnaud: has anyone looked at them?
Arnaud Le Hors: has anyone looked at them? ←
15:08:29 <Ruben> yes, approve
Ruben Verborgh: yes, approve ←
15:08:35 <SteveS> looked at and approve
Steve Speicher: looked at and approve ←
15:08:43 <BartvanLeeuwen> +1
Bart van Leeuwen: +1 ←
15:09:21 <rogerm> resolved: minutes 26 November 2012 of approved
RESOLVED: minutes 26 November 2012 of approved ←
15:10:59 <rogerm> 10th and 17th December are the remaining calls this year.
10th and 17th December are the remaining calls this year. ←
15:11:13 <rogerm> topic: Actions and Issues
<rogerm> subtopic: Actions
<rogerm> Arnaud: anyone wants to claim victory on any of the open issues?
Arnaud Le Hors: anyone wants to claim victory on any of the open issues? ←
<rogerm> ... hearing none, let's move on to issues
... hearing none, let's move on to issues ←
15:14:09 <rogerm> subtopic: Issue-2 and Issue-3
15:11:14 <Zakim> +SteveBattle
Zakim IRC Bot: +SteveBattle ←
15:11:46 <Arnaud> andys, issues pending review: http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/pendingreview
Arnaud Le Hors: andys, issues pending review: http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/pendingreview ←
15:12:08 <Zakim> +??P52
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P52 ←
15:12:09 <Arnaud> those three are really for you to confirm it's ok to close
Arnaud Le Hors: those three are really for you to confirm it's ok to close ←
15:12:37 <krp> zakim, ??P52 is me
Kevin Page: zakim, ??P52 is me ←
15:12:38 <Zakim> +krp; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +krp; got it ←
15:12:41 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller] ←
15:12:47 <AndyS> zakim, IPCaller is me
Andy Seaborne: zakim, IPCaller is me ←
15:12:47 <Zakim> +AndyS; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +AndyS; got it ←
15:12:57 <rogerm> issues 2,3 and 7 are pending review
issues 2,3 and 7 are pending review ←
15:13:34 <SteveS> ISSUE-2 ?
15:13:34 <trackbot> ISSUE-2 -- Do BPResource versions get managed in a systematic, discoverable way? -- pending review
Trackbot IRC Bot: ISSUE-2 -- Do BPResource versions get managed in a systematic, discoverable way? -- pending review ←
15:13:34 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/2
Trackbot IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/2 ←
15:13:39 <SteveS> ISSUE-3 ?
15:13:39 <trackbot> ISSUE-3 -- Do BPContainer versions get managed in a systematic, discoverable way? -- pending review
Trackbot IRC Bot: ISSUE-3 -- Do BPContainer versions get managed in a systematic, discoverable way? -- pending review ←
15:13:39 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/3
Trackbot IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/3 ←
<rogerm> Arnaud: andys, are you ok with the decision to close these issues on the basis that LDP won't address them?
Arnaud Le Hors: andys, are you ok with the decision to close these issues on the basis that LDP won't address them? ←
<rogerm> andys: yes, that's reasonable
Andy Seaborne: yes, that's reasonable ←
15:14:42 <Arnaud> RESOLVED: close issue-2
15:14:42 <Arnaud> close issue-2
Arnaud Le Hors: close ISSUE-2 ←
15:14:42 <trackbot> ISSUE-2 Do BPResource versions get managed in a systematic, discoverable way? closed
Trackbot IRC Bot: ISSUE-2 Do BPResource versions get managed in a systematic, discoverable way? closed ←
15:14:48 <Arnaud> RESOLVED: close issue-3
15:14:48 <Arnaud> close issue-3
Arnaud Le Hors: close ISSUE-3 ←
15:14:48 <trackbot> ISSUE-3 Do BPContainer versions get managed in a systematic, discoverable way? closed
Trackbot IRC Bot: ISSUE-3 Do BPContainer versions get managed in a systematic, discoverable way? closed ←
<rogerm> andys: can we please have an explanation of why we are closing them inserted in tracker?
Andy Seaborne: can we please have an explanation of why we are closing them inserted in tracker? ←
<rogerm> Arnaud: yes, I'll make sure there is a note
Arnaud Le Hors: yes, I'll make sure there is a note ←
15:15:34 <rogerm> subtopic: Issue-7
15:15:34 <SteveS> ISSUE-7 ?
15:15:34 <trackbot> ISSUE-7 -- What operations are permitted on containers and how do they get invoked? -- pending review
Trackbot IRC Bot: ISSUE-7 -- What operations are permitted on containers and how do they get invoked? -- pending review ←
15:15:34 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/7
Trackbot IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/7 ←
15:16:12 <Zakim> -krp
Zakim IRC Bot: -krp ←
15:16:23 <SteveS> This might refresh AndyS memory on where this is left http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2012Nov/0079.html
Steve Speicher: This might refresh AndyS memory on where this is left http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2012Nov/0079.html ←
15:17:09 <Zakim> +??P52
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P52 ←
15:17:09 <rogerm> Arnaud: can we close issue 7 because the content is covered elsewhere?
Arnaud Le Hors: can we close ISSUE-7 because the content is covered elsewhere? ←
15:18:40 <rogerm> AndyS: a general model of the LDP framework would probably cover issue 7
Andy Seaborne: a general model of the LDP framework would probably cover ISSUE-7 ←
<rogerm> ... we can reopen one if needed later on
... we can reopen one if needed later on ←
15:18:43 <Arnaud> resolved: close issue-7
15:18:48 <Arnaud> close issue-7
Arnaud Le Hors: close ISSUE-7 ←
15:18:48 <trackbot> ISSUE-7 What operations are permitted on containers and how do they get invoked? closed
Trackbot IRC Bot: ISSUE-7 What operations are permitted on containers and how do they get invoked? closed ←
<rogerm> Arnaud: we also have some raised issues
Arnaud Le Hors: we also have some raised issues ←
15:19:29 <rogerm> subtopic: Issue-40
15:20:13 <Zakim> -??P52
Zakim IRC Bot: -??P52 ←
15:20:26 <rogerm> http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/40
http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/40 ←
<rogerm> Arnaud: this one looks like it's covered already but we'll wait for Henry to be on to close it
Arnaud Le Hors: this one looks like it's covered already but we'll wait for Henry to be on to close it ←
15:21:37 <Zakim> +??P52
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P52 ←
15:21:55 <rogerm> subtopic: Issue-41
15:22:14 <rogerm> stevebattle: issue 40 and 41 overlap
Steve Battle: ISSUE-40 and 41 overlap ←
<rogerm> Arnaud: I think it differs in that it calls for several operations to be taken at the same time
Arnaud Le Hors: I think it differs in that it calls for several operations to be taken at the same time ←
<rogerm> ... but again let's wait to have John on the call to decide what to do with it
... but again let's wait to have John on the call to decide what to do with it ←
15:22:33 <AndyS> q+
Andy Seaborne: q+ ←
15:22:53 <AndyS> q-
Andy Seaborne: q- ←
15:23:30 <rogerm> topic: Test suite and Validator
15:23:49 <rogerm> Arnaud: today was deadline for making proposals on this.
Arnaud Le Hors: today was deadline for making proposals on this. ←
<rogerm> ... stevebattle added some requirement but otherwise it looks like we really only have one proposal
... stevebattle added some requirement but otherwise it looks like we really only have one proposal ←
15:24:06 <stevebattle> They represent the same use-cases but different scenarios - single v multiple attachments.
Steve Battle: They represent the same use-cases but different scenarios - single v multiple attachments. ←
15:26:36 <stevebattle> Do you know if Earl supports traceability?
Steve Battle: Do you know if Earl supports traceability? ←
15:27:07 <rogerm> http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Testing
http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Testing ←
15:27:11 <stevebattle> traceability: RDF links from test cases to use-cases.
Steve Battle: traceability: RDF links from test cases to use-cases. ←
15:27:27 <rogerm> ericp: Earl is an RDF language. it is used in the W3C, more and more tools are being developed for it
Eric Prud'hommeaux: Earl is an RDF language. it is used in the W3C, more and more tools are being developed for it ←
15:28:02 <AndyS> EARL + RDF/SPARQL Manifest framework.
Andy Seaborne: EARL + RDF/SPARQL Manifest framework. ←
15:28:05 <stevebattle> The power of RDF!
Steve Battle: The power of RDF! ←
15:30:15 <stevebattle> I'd like to contribute test-cases (derived from use-case scenarios).
Steve Battle: I'd like to contribute test-cases (derived from use-case scenarios). ←
15:30:22 <rogerm> Arnaud: is Earl used in combination with HTTP-in-RDF vocab ?
Arnaud Le Hors: is Earl used in combination with HTTP-in-RDF vocab ? ←
<rogerm> steves: yes, that's my understanding
Steve Speicher: yes, that's my understanding ←
15:31:27 <rogerm> Arnaud: it would be great to have some examples of what the tests would actually look like.
Arnaud Le Hors: it would be great to have some examples of what the tests would actually look like. ←
<rogerm> ... I will follow up with Alexandre and see if he can give us some guidance
... I will follow up with Alexandre and see if he can give us some guidance ←
15:32:48 <Arnaud> q?
Arnaud Le Hors: q? ←
15:32:51 <Zakim> -??P52
Zakim IRC Bot: -??P52 ←
15:33:01 <rogerm> q+
q+ ←
15:33:13 <Arnaud> RESOLVED: HTTP-in-RDF and EARL will be used for our test suite
RESOLVED: HTTP-in-RDF and EARL will be used for our test suite ←
15:33:18 <Zakim> +??P52
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P52 ←
<rogerm> Arnaud: regarding the validator, we will see later but sandro said the W3C might be able to host a validator for servers
Arnaud Le Hors: regarding the validator, we will see later but sandro said the W3C might be able to host a validator for servers ←
<rogerm> rogerm: what about validating clients?
Roger Menday: what about validating clients? ←
15:35:13 <Arnaud> ack rogerm
Arnaud Le Hors: ack rogerm ←
15:35:42 <rogerm> sandro: there is more experience around validating a server
Sandro Hawke: there is more experience around validating a server ←
15:36:35 <SteveS> q+
Steve Speicher: q+ ←
15:36:46 <rogerm> sandro: another option is to download some client code to run locally
Sandro Hawke: another option is to download some client code to run locally ←
15:37:20 <Arnaud> ack steves
Arnaud Le Hors: ack steves ←
15:38:07 <rogerm> SteveS: maybe offer a reference server
Steve Speicher: maybe offer a reference server ←
15:39:10 <rogerm> topic: Use Cases & Requirements document
15:43:09 <rogerm> stevebattle: should security aspect be included in UC&R ?
Steve Battle: should security aspect be included in UC&R ? ←
15:43:10 <SteveS> Should we keep this section is the question: http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Use_Cases_And_Requirements#LDP_and_Authentication.2FAuthorization
Steve Speicher: Should we keep this section is the question: http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Use_Cases_And_Requirements#LDP_and_Authentication.2FAuthorization ←
15:44:00 <SteveS> PROPOSAL: Move this to Access Control requirements wiki
PROPOSED: Move this to Access Control requirements wiki page ←
15:44:04 <rogerm> regarding UC&R, I will update the IaaS story
regarding UC&R, I will update the IaaS story ←
15:44:43 <SteveS> s/requirements wiki/requirements wiki page/
15:44:44 <Arnaud> RESOLVED: Move 1.4.11 to the access control UC&R doc
RESOLVED: Move 1.4.11 to the access control UC&R doc ←
15:45:38 <rogerm> Arnaud: who added the "data sharing" story ?
Arnaud Le Hors: who added the "data sharing" story ? ←
15:46:22 <rogerm> ... the default is to remove this story, unless someone claims ownership
... the default is to remove this story, unless someone claims ownership ←
15:47:01 <SteveS> believe that Christophe Gueret owns the "data sharing" story
Steve Speicher: believe that Christophe Gueret owns the "data sharing" story ←
<rogerm> Arnaud: suggest the editors contact Christophe directly and inform him that we will drop his use case unless he provides some clarification
Arnaud Le Hors: suggest the editors contact Christophe directly and inform him that we will drop his use case unless he provides some clarification ←
<rogerm> stevebattle: ok, will do
Steve Battle: ok, will do ←
15:48:39 <Arnaud> q?
Arnaud Le Hors: q? ←
15:48:54 <rogerm> Arnaud: By next week (Dec 10th), the UC&R will be in good shape for review
Arnaud Le Hors: By next week (Dec 10th), the UC&R will be in good shape for review ←
15:49:05 <stevebattle> OK
Steve Battle: OK ←
15:52:24 <rogerm> topic: Specification
<rogerm> steves: working on it, have been busy with the UC&R, plan to make some proposal on the open issues
Steve Speicher: working on it, have been busy with the UC&R, plan to make some proposal on the open issues ←
15:52:32 <rogerm> topic: Open issues
15:52:32 <rogerm> subtopic: Issue-37
15:53:24 <rogerm> steves: dret was going to create a wiki and draft some text about the model
Steve Speicher: dret was going to create a wiki and draft some text about the model ←
15:53:24 <rogerm> ... I haven't seen it yet, will follow up with him
... I haven't seen it yet, will follow up with him ←
15:54:21 <stevebattle> q+
Steve Battle: q+ ←
15:54:40 <rogerm> Arnaud: what is the outstanding issue which has the largest potential impact on the spec ?
Arnaud Le Hors: what is the outstanding issue which has the largest potential impact on the spec ? ←
<rogerm> steves: not sure there is really one
Steve Speicher: not sure there is really one ←
<rogerm> Arnaud: I think issue-37
Arnaud Le Hors: I think ISSUE-37 ←
15:54:42 <stevebattle> q-
Steve Battle: q- ←
15:54:48 <Zakim> -??P52
Zakim IRC Bot: -??P52 ←
15:55:00 <stevebattle> I concur - the aggregation/composition issues are critical
Steve Battle: I concur - the aggregation/composition issues are critical ←
15:55:02 <BartvanLeeuwen> q+
Bart van Leeuwen: q+ ←
15:55:11 <Zakim> +??P40
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P40 ←
15:55:16 <Arnaud> ack bart
Arnaud Le Hors: ack bart ←
15:56:06 <rogerm> Bart: do/can resources have a link *back* to the container they are in ?
Bart van Leeuwen: do/can resources have a link *back* to the container they are in ? ←
15:56:42 <rogerm> the current spec does not mandate this
the current spec does not mandate this ←
15:56:47 <rogerm> thanks
thanks ←
<rogerm> Arnaud: current spec does not mandate this
Arnaud Le Hors: current spec does not mandate this ←
<rogerm> steves: application may choose to have them
Steve Speicher: application may choose to have them ←
15:57:25 <MacTed> no mandate, +1. option to do so, +1.
Ted Thibodeau: no mandate, +1. option to do so, +1. ←
<rogerm> steves: believe Issue-21 is about that, although it's against the UC&R
Steve Speicher: believe ISSUE-21 is about that, although it's against the UC&R ←
15:57:36 <rogerm> subtopic: Issue-21
15:57:45 <MacTed> big difference between "must have" and "can have"...
Ted Thibodeau: big difference between "must have" and "can have"... ←
15:58:53 <Arnaud> q?
Arnaud Le Hors: q? ←
15:58:58 <stevebattle> I raised it against UC&R because it stemmed from there.
Steve Battle: I raised it against UC&R because it stemmed from there. ←
15:59:12 <stevebattle> It is *really* an issue on the spec.
Steve Battle: It is *really* an issue on the spec. ←
15:59:24 <rogerm> SteveS: what is the motivating use-case for the link-back requirement ?
Steve Speicher: what is the motivating use-case for the link-back requirement ? ←
<rogerm> bart: ok, will look into it
Bart van Leeuwen: ok, will look into it ←
15:59:49 <MacTed> Zakim, unmute me
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, unmute me ←
15:59:49 <Zakim> MacTed should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: MacTed should no longer be muted ←
15:59:54 <Zakim> -Ashok_Malhotra
Zakim IRC Bot: -Ashok_Malhotra ←
16:00:12 <krp> zakim, ??P40 is me
Kevin Page: zakim, ??P40 is me ←
16:00:12 <Zakim> +krp; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +krp; got it ←
16:00:13 <MacTed> think about chapters in a book...
Ted Thibodeau: think about chapters in a book... ←
16:00:24 <MacTed> pictures in an album...
Ted Thibodeau: pictures in an album... ←
16:01:16 <rogerm> Arnaud: need people to propose solutions to the issues which have been raised ... !
Arnaud Le Hors: need people to propose solutions to the issues which have been raised ... ! ←
<rogerm> ... default will be to close issues accepting that they are not addressed by the spec
... default will be to close issues accepting that they are not addressed by the spec ←
<rogerm> ... if anyone cares about an issue they should make a proposal on how to resolve it
... if anyone cares about an issue they should make a proposal on how to resolve it ←
16:01:43 <Arnaud> q?
Arnaud Le Hors: q? ←
16:01:46 <rogerm> q+
q+ ←
16:02:32 <Arnaud> ack rogerm
Arnaud Le Hors: ack rogerm ←
<rogerm> rogerm: interested in issue-37
Roger Menday: interested in ISSUE-37 ←
<rogerm> Arnaud: thanks, but we already have dret and steves working on it
Arnaud Le Hors: thanks, but we already have dret and steves working on it ←
<rogerm> rogerm: think once we solve issue-37 the rest will be easier
Roger Menday: think once we solve ISSUE-37 the rest will be easier ←
16:02:56 <stevebattle> I would send your ideas to Erik, Roger.
Steve Battle: I would send your ideas to Erik, Roger. ←
16:03:14 <Zakim> -MacTed
Zakim IRC Bot: -MacTed ←
16:03:20 <stevebattle> Bye
Steve Battle: Bye ←
16:03:22 <Zakim> -Sandro
Zakim IRC Bot: -Sandro ←
16:03:22 <Arnaud> MEETING ADJOURNED
Arnaud Le Hors: MEETING ADJOURNED ←
16:03:23 <BartvanLeeuwen> bye
Bart van Leeuwen: bye ←
16:03:23 <Zakim> -SteveS
Zakim IRC Bot: -SteveS ←
16:03:23 <Zakim> -rogerm
Zakim IRC Bot: -rogerm ←
16:03:29 <Zakim> -AndyS
Zakim IRC Bot: -AndyS ←
16:03:38 <Zakim> -Arnaud
Zakim IRC Bot: -Arnaud ←
16:03:39 <Zakim> -Ruben
Zakim IRC Bot: -Ruben ←
16:03:48 <Zakim> -krp
Zakim IRC Bot: -krp ←
16:03:50 <Zakim> -BartvanLeeuwen
Zakim IRC Bot: -BartvanLeeuwen ←
Formatted by CommonScribe