ISSUE-214: prov:Agent vs duv:Agent

prov:Agent vs duv:Agent

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Data Usage Vocabulary
Raised by:
Eric Stephan
Opened on:
2015-11-20
Description:
Data vocabulary reuse question: In the citation model, is it better to use prov:Agent that is a superclass to new classes such as foaf:Project or should we create a new class duv:Agent?
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: dwbp-ISSUE-214: prov:Agent vs duv:Agent [Data Usage Vocabulary] (from ericphb@gmail.com on 2015-11-20)
  2. Re: dwbp-ISSUE-214: prov:Agent vs duv:Agent [Data Usage Vocabulary] (from jpalmeida@ieee.org on 2015-11-20)
  3. Re: dwbp-ISSUE-214: prov:Agent vs duv:Agent [Data Usage Vocabulary] (from auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr on 2015-11-20)
  4. Re: dwbp-ISSUE-214: prov:Agent vs duv:Agent [Data Usage Vocabulary] (from jpalmeida@ieee.org on 2015-11-20)
  5. Re: dwbp-ISSUE-214: prov:Agent vs duv:Agent [Data Usage Vocabulary] (from ericphb@gmail.com on 2015-11-20)
  6. Re: dwbp-ISSUE-214: prov:Agent vs duv:Agent [Data Usage Vocabulary] (from jpalmeida@ieee.org on 2015-11-20)
  7. dwbp-ISSUE-214: prov:Agent vs duv:Agent [Data Usage Vocabulary] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2015-11-20)

Related notes:

Based on previous discussions, we've decided to go with prov:Agent. If vocabulary users need to extend these definitions skos:Concept is being used to address any tailor made references to projects, collabortions etc.

Eric Stephan, 11 Dec 2015, 09:53:21

Display change log ATOM feed


Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 214.html,v 1.1 2017/02/13 15:26:30 ted Exp $