Re: dwbp-ISSUE-214: prov:Agent vs duv:Agent [Data Usage Vocabulary]

Dear Eric,

Would you please clarify the issue?

As far as I am aware, foaf:Project is not a subclass of prov:Agent.


Regards,
Joćo Paulo


On 20/11/15, 9:40 AM, "Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue
Tracker" <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:

>dwbp-ISSUE-214: prov:Agent vs duv:Agent [Data Usage Vocabulary]
>
>http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/214
>
>Raised by: Eric Stephan
>On product: Data Usage Vocabulary
>
>Data vocabulary reuse question: In the citation model, is it better to
>use prov:Agent that is a superclass to new classes such as foaf:Project
>or should we create a new class duv:Agent?
>
>
>

Received on Friday, 20 November 2015 12:57:29 UTC