ISSUE-214: prov:Agent vs duv:Agent
prov:Agent vs duv:Agent
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Data Usage Vocabulary
- Raised by:
- Eric Stephan
- Opened on:
- 2015-11-20
- Description:
- Data vocabulary reuse question: In the citation model, is it better to use prov:Agent that is a superclass to new classes such as foaf:Project or should we create a new class duv:Agent?
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-214: prov:Agent vs duv:Agent [Data Usage Vocabulary] (from ericphb@gmail.com on 2015-11-20)
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-214: prov:Agent vs duv:Agent [Data Usage Vocabulary] (from jpalmeida@ieee.org on 2015-11-20)
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-214: prov:Agent vs duv:Agent [Data Usage Vocabulary] (from auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr on 2015-11-20)
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-214: prov:Agent vs duv:Agent [Data Usage Vocabulary] (from jpalmeida@ieee.org on 2015-11-20)
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-214: prov:Agent vs duv:Agent [Data Usage Vocabulary] (from ericphb@gmail.com on 2015-11-20)
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-214: prov:Agent vs duv:Agent [Data Usage Vocabulary] (from jpalmeida@ieee.org on 2015-11-20)
- dwbp-ISSUE-214: prov:Agent vs duv:Agent [Data Usage Vocabulary] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2015-11-20)
Related notes:
Based on previous discussions, we've decided to go with prov:Agent. If vocabulary users need to extend these definitions skos:Concept is being used to address any tailor made references to projects, collabortions etc.
Eric Stephan, 11 Dec 2015, 09:53:21Display change log