W3C

- DRAFT -

Protocols and Formats Working Group Teleconference
09 Sep 2013

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Jon_Gunderson, James_Craig, Rich, Joseph_Scheuhammer, Michael_Cooper, janina
Regrets
Chair
Rich
Scribe
jcraig, janina

Contents


<trackbot> Date: 09 September 2013

<scribe> meeting: W3C WAI-PF ARIA Caucus

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg/2013Sep/0010.html

<jcraig> scribe: jcraig

<janina> Hi, I'll be there soon. HTML-A11Y Coordination call going long.

Joseph: test case 509 isn't showing up in any testrun. (link?)

https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/testharness/testcases/edit?testsuite_id=1&testcase_id=509

<richardschwerdtfeger> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/testharness/testreport?testsuite_id=1&filter_required=on&filter_cr_met=on&filter=Filter+view

<clown> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/testharness/testresults?testsuite_id=1&testcase_id=734

<richardschwerdtfeger> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg/2013Sep/0010.html

<clown> scribenick: richardschwerdtfeger

jcraig: checking to see if I have an action for aria-describedat 1.1 first draft

rich: do you think you might have a draft?

jcraig: yes, by the end of the month

<scribe> scribe: jcraig

<clown> action-967?

<trackbot> action-967 -- Janina Sajka to work with Rich to work with DAISY establish a structural navigation model for ARIA landmarks related to comment 362 -- due 2012-05-01 -- OPEN

<trackbot> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/967

UAIG

Joseph: created a 1.1 implementation guide at last meeting, michael had doubts as to the need.

MC: Debated branching versus updating for implementation guide.

RS: Hoping to have IndieUI in LC/CR by the ARIA 1.1 timeframe.

JS: IndieUI Events 1.0 seems to be on track for that.

RS: I think we need a 1.1 implementation guide

MC: No strong opinion, but I think the 1.0 implementation guide could just be updated for 1.1 spec

JC: Also in ARIA 1.1 are the text and switch roles, maybe others.

RS: I heard 2016 for the ARIA 1.1 LC, to coincide with HTML

MC: I think we discussed 2015 for 1.1.
... And FPWD of ARIA 2.0 in 2014.
... public timeline for ARIA 2.0 FPWD is listed as 2017.

<MichaelC> PF specification timeline planning

MC: We can update the timelines in the planning page if needed, particularly if tight dependency on HTML and they change their timeline

RS: Can certainly vet the requirements for 2.0.

<clown> action-1219?

<trackbot> action-1219 -- Joseph Scheuhammer to UAIG: passive RFC requirement: two instances of "The state change events MAY be trimmed out for performance" Who is this requirement for? Authors? UA? AT? Be specific. What does "trimmed out" mean? Be specific. -- due 2013-05-14 -- OPEN

<trackbot> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1219

Joseph: What's the status of ACTION-1219?

RS: Firefox was trimming out selection change events for performance reasons; needed you to coord with David Bolter and Alex Surkov
... If they decide to trim out some events for perf reasons, we decided that was okay

JC: Might that cause a problem with AT?

<clown> http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/aria-implementation/#mapping_events_selection

RS: Possibly, but we haven't run into issues yet.

"EVENT_OBJECT_SELECTIONWITHIN is all that is necessary. The state change events MAY be trimmed out for performance."

Joseph: Don't need the additional events in this case, b/c a single event is enough in this case. The rest are redundant.

RS: Make sure Alex sees this edit.

<richardschwerdtfeger> EVENT_OBJECT_SELECTION

<richardschwerdtfeger> EVENT_OBJECT_SELECTIONADD

RS: Next question, if you see EVENT_OBJECT_SELECTION, should we expect to not see EVENT_OBJECT_SELECTIONADD

<richardschwerdtfeger> never seen: EVENT_OBJECT_SELECTIONWITHIN

I think EVENT_OBJECT_SELECTIONWITHIN was running in IE, but I never saw it in Firefox.

<richardschwerdtfeger> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/testharness/testreport?testsuite_id=1&filter_required=on&filter_cr_met=on&filter=Filter+vie

Test Report

https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/testharness/testreport?testsuite_id=1&filter_required=on&filter_cr_met=on&filter=Filter+vie

Joseph: Managed to get 895-899 passing

RS: Remaining 344, 345, 509, 734, 735

Joseph: Cynthia may have a fix for _num_

JC: Work was done in WebKit on these in the last week. I'll run 344, 345, 509, 734, and 735 again in bleeding edge version.

<richardschwerdtfeger> AXMenuItem

<richardschwerdtfeger> <nil>

<richardschwerdtfeger> 'menu item'

<richardschwerdtfeger> If aria-checked (state)="true": AXMenuItemMarkChar ✓

<richardschwerdtfeger> Otherwise: AXMenuItemMarkChar <nil>

Group: discussion of specific test case results

<richardschwerdtfeger> test cases: 344, 345, 509, 734, 735

<richardschwerdtfeger> jon: please run test cases 895-899 on Win8/IE10

<richardschwerdtfeger> http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/testharness/testreport?testsuite_id=2

<richardschwerdtfeger> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/testharness/testcases?testsuite_id=3

<richardschwerdtfeger> http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/testharness/testreport?testsuite_id=2

<richardschwerdtfeger> ACTION: Jon write some UAIG test cases and expected results starting with test case 102 and working backward [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/09/09-pf-minutes.html#action01]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-1258 - Write some uaig test cases and expected results starting with test case 102 and working backward [on Jon Gunderson - due 2013-09-16].

<scribe> ACTION: Cooper to file a bug against trackbot to post a link in the IRC to the trackbot-created ACTIONS. ;-) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/09/09-pf-minutes.html#action02]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-1259 - File a bug against trackbot to post a link in the irc to the trackbot-created actions. ;-) [on Michael Cooper - due 2013-09-16].

<janina> http://www.w3.org/TR/html-aapi/

HTML AAPI

JS: Trying to publish a heartbeat draft

<MichaelC> clown, expected results should be restored for the AT / SPI special statements (test suite 3) now

<Zakim> jcraig, you wanted to object that this should be an informative, updatable document, not a normative spec

JC: Otherwise, it will be immeditatly out of date

RS: No commitment to do a normative doc for HTML 5.0; just 5.1

MC: This doc has already been published to TR, so this is only a heartbeat draft.
... My understanding was that this was originally published with PF group approval

HTML/ARIA mapping http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/dom.html#sec-implicit-aria-semantics

<janina> scribe: janina

<jongund> RS: Here is my problem the person is chairing it has moved off the project, I am not sure who is working on the document

rich: There's lack of continuity and consistency here, we're unclear on this in several respects.

<clown> http://rawgithub.com/w3c/html-api-map/master/index.html

michael: Listed in our charter, but PF wasn't checked the first time around.
... Also a difference on whether we're OK on the content, or on whether it's normative or a note
... Believe this was first published before PF was integrated into the publication decisioning process for TF docs

<jongund> got to go

rich: Important this is a 5.1 doc, not 5.0; and if not 5.0, why publish now?

michael: To demonstrate work continues

janina: HTML has heartbeat concept we don't

michael: we're supposed to
... means every three months

<clown> "This is a draft document and may be updated, replaced or obsoleted by other documents at any time"

michael: are there diffs from before

janina: yes

michael: We have a doc without a leader, taken off rec track; we don't know the future of this doc
... If it hadn't had a fpwd, I'd feel stronger about an objection

rich: Important to recognize that 5.1 apis will change dramatically

clown: Maybe that's our objection, this needs to be clearly marked as 5.1

Summary of Action Items

[NEW] ACTION: Cooper to file a bug against trackbot to post a link in the IRC to the trackbot-created ACTIONS. ;-) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/09/09-pf-minutes.html#action02]
[NEW] ACTION: Jon write some UAIG test cases and expected results starting with test case 102 and working backward [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/09/09-pf-minutes.html#action01]
 
[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.138 (CVS log)
$Date: 2013/09/09 15:38:24 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.138  of Date: 2013-04-25 13:59:11  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/isn't working/isn't showing up in any testrun/
Succeeded: s/2015/2016/
Succeeded: s/_missed_/We can update the timelines in the planning page if needed, particularly if tight dependency on HTML and they change their timeline/
Succeeded: s/_this_/EVENT_OBJECT_SELECTION/
Succeeded: s/_that_/EVENT_OBJECT_SELECTIONADD/
Succeeded: s/Cynthia/Joseph: Cynthia/
Found Scribe: jcraig
Inferring ScribeNick: jcraig
Found ScribeNick: richardschwerdtfeger
Found Scribe: jcraig
Inferring ScribeNick: jcraig
Found Scribe: janina
Inferring ScribeNick: janina
Scribes: jcraig, janina
ScribeNicks: richardschwerdtfeger, jcraig, janina
Default Present: Jon_Gunderson, James_Craig, Rich, Joseph_Scheuhammer, Michael_Cooper, janina
Present: Jon_Gunderson James_Craig Rich Joseph_Scheuhammer Michael_Cooper janina
Found Date: 09 Sep 2013
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2013/09/09-pf-minutes.html
People with action items: cooper jon

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.


[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]