ISSUE-91: Might want prohibitions on first parties re-selling data to get around the intent of DNT
Might want prohibitions on first parties re-selling data to get around the intent of DNT
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Compliance Next
- Raised by:
- Opened on:
- 2011-10-12
- Description:
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: Mapping the "framework" to ISSUEs (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-05-07)
- Mapping the "framework" to ISSUEs (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-05-07)
- Issue-5 - Cross Tracking Definition Proposal (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-02-06)
- Re: [ISSUE-5] What is the definition of tracking? (from CPedigo@online-publishers.org on 2011-12-10)
- Re: [ISSUE-5] What is the definition of tracking? (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2011-12-10)
- [ISSUE-5] What is the definition of tracking? (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2011-12-09)
- Next steps on compliance issues (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2011-12-03)
- Re: ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2011-10-12)
- ISSUE-91: Might want prohibitions on first parties re-selling data to get around the intent of DNT (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-10-12)
Related notes:
[npdoty]: closed as per the existing text "If an operator of a first party domain stores a request to which a [DNT-ON] header is attached, that operator must not transmit information about that stored communication to a third party, outside of the explicitly expressed exceptions as defined in this standard."
25 Jan 2012, 09:50:33Display change log
