ISSUE-48: Response from the server should indicate the server will honor it
Response from the server should indicate the server will honor it
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)
- Raised by:
- Opened on:
- 2011-09-21
- Description:
- An element in the response header that indicates to what extent the server promises to honor a DNT request.
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: Mapping the "framework" to ISSUEs (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-05-07)
- Mapping the "framework" to ISSUEs (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-05-07)
- Re: ACTION-114 ISSUE-107 : Revised response header. (from ktrilli@truste.com on 2012-02-08)
- Re: ACTION-114 ISSUE-107 : Revised response header. (from sharvey@google.com on 2012-02-05)
- Re: ACTION-114 ISSUE-107 : Revised response header. (from sharvey@google.com on 2012-02-05)
- ACTION-114 ISSUE-107 : Revised response header. (from tom@mozilla.com on 2012-02-03)
- Re: Revised Response Header (from tom@mozilla.com on 2012-01-26)
- RE: Revised Response Header (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-01-25)
- Re: Revised Response Header (from tom@mozilla.com on 2012-01-25)
- Re: Revised Response Header (from singer@apple.com on 2012-01-25)
- Re: Revised Response Header (from singer@apple.com on 2012-01-25)
- Revised Response Header (from tom@mozilla.com on 2012-01-25)
- diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-01-10)
- RE: Proposed Agenda for 2011-11-30 TPWG call (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-11-30)
- RE: Proposed Agenda for 2011-11-30 TPWG call (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-11-30)
- Proposed Agenda for 2011-11-30 TPWG call (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-11-30)
- TPE site-specific exemption (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2011-10-31)
- Re: Agenda for 2011-10-12 DNT Workgroup Meeting (from npdoty@w3.org on 2011-10-13)
- Re: Agenda for 2011-10-12 DNT Workgroup Meeting (from nmarnau@datenschutzzentrum.de on 2011-10-11)
- Agenda for 2011-10-12 DNT Workgroup Meeting (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-11)
- Re: Agenda for 2011-10-05 TPWG call (from npdoty@w3.org on 2011-10-09)
- Agenda for 2011-10-04 TPWG call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2011-10-04)
- Response Headers [ISSUE-47,ISSUE-48,ISSUE-51,ISSUE-76,ISSUE-79,ISSUE-80,ISSUE-81,ISSUE-87] (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-04)
- ISSUE-48: Response from the server could both acknowledge receipt of a value and (separately) whether the server will honor it (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-09-21)
Related notes:
[tlr]: alternate design choice for ISSUE-47
21 Sep 2011, 21:35:46[npdoty]: could enable the browser to tell the user that they may still be tracked
21 Sep 2011, 21:41:27Our current proposal statically declares whether a site honors DNT. The other part is treated in ISSUE-76.
Matthias Schunter, 27 Oct 2011, 15:10:39The text "could both acknowledge receipt of a value and (separately)" has been superseded by ISSUE-76 and has been deleted here.
Matthias Schunter, 19 Jan 2012, 16:43:37CLOSED as now discussed under ISSUE-45 (legally binding statements of server)
Matthias Schunter, 7 Feb 2012, 13:52:08Display change log