ISSUE-26: Providing data to 3rd-party widgets -- does that imply consent?
Providing data to 3rd-party widgets -- does that imply consent?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Compliance Next
- Raised by:
- Opened on:
- 2011-09-21
- Description:
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- agenda: 18 April 2012 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-04-18)
- EFF/Mozilla/Stanford Proposal (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-04-07)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from blsaws@gmail.com on 2012-01-23)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from npdoty@w3.org on 2012-01-20)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from dwainberg@appnexus.com on 2012-01-13)
- RE: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from CPedigo@online-publishers.org on 2012-01-11)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2012-01-11)
- RE: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from CPedigo@online-publishers.org on 2012-01-11)
- RE: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from CPedigo@online-publishers.org on 2012-01-11)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-01-10)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from justin@cdt.org on 2012-01-10)
- RE: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-01-09)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from cedric@laurant.org on 2012-01-07)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-01-07)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-01-07)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2012-01-06)
- RE: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-01-06)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-01-06)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-01-06)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from justin@cdt.org on 2012-01-06)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-01-06)
- RE: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from acolando@microsoft.com on 2012-01-06)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-01-05)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-01-05)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-01-05)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-01-05)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from heatherwest@google.com on 2012-01-05)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from justin@cdt.org on 2012-01-05)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-01-04)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from singer@apple.com on 2012-01-04)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-01-04)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from singer@apple.com on 2012-01-04)
- Re: Re ISSUE-26: When a 3rd party becomes a 1st party (from singer@apple.com on 2012-01-03)
- Agenda for 2012-1-3 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-01-03)
- Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from derhoermi@gmx.net on 2011-12-23)
- Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2011-12-22)
- Re: Re ISSUE-26: When a 3rd party becomes a 1st party (from tien@eff.org on 2011-12-16)
- Re: Re ISSUE-26: When a 3rd party becomes a 1st party (from derhoermi@gmx.net on 2011-12-15)
- RE: Re ISSUE-26: When a 3rd party becomes a 1st party (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2011-12-15)
- RE: Re ISSUE-26: When a 3rd party becomes a 1st party (from jccannon@microsoft.com on 2011-12-15)
- Re: Re ISSUE-26: When a 3rd party becomes a 1st party (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2011-12-15)
- Re: Re ISSUE-26: When a 3rd party becomes a 1st party (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2011-12-15)
- Re: Re ISSUE-26: When a 3rd party becomes a 1st party (from karld@opera.com on 2011-12-15)
- Re: Re ISSUE-26: When a 3rd party becomes a 1st party (from singer@apple.com on 2011-12-15)
- Re: Re ISSUE-26: When a 3rd party becomes a 1st party (from justin@cdt.org on 2011-12-15)
- RE: Re ISSUE-26: When a 3rd party becomes a 1st party (from jccannon@microsoft.com on 2011-12-15)
- Re: Re ISSUE-26: When a 3rd party becomes a 1st party (from nmarnau@datenschutzzentrum.de on 2011-12-15)
- Re: Re ISSUE-26: When a 3rd party becomes a 1st party (from singer@apple.com on 2011-12-15)
- RE: Re ISSUE-26: When a 3rd party becomes a 1st party (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-12-15)
- Re: Re ISSUE-26: When a 3rd party becomes a 1st party (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2011-12-15)
- RE: Re ISSUE-26: When a 3rd party becomes a 1st party (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-12-15)
- Re: Re ISSUE-26: When a 3rd party becomes a 1st party (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2011-12-15)
- Re ISSUE-26: When a 3rd party becomes a 1st party (from blsaws@gmail.com on 2011-12-14)
- Re: Compliance issues (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2011-12-07)
- Compliance issues (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2011-12-06)
- Re: Agenda for 2011-11-09 TPWG call (from singer@apple.com on 2011-11-09)
- Agenda for 2011-11-09 TPWG call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2011-11-08)
- agenda for wednesday call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2011-10-18)
- Re: Facebook tracking (from fran@fb.com on 2011-09-26)
- Re: Facebook tracking (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2011-09-25)
- ISSUE-26: Providing data to 3rd-party widgets -- does that imply consent? (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-09-21)
Related notes:
For the moment this appears to be handled bundled with issue-10. Closing for now, will reopen if we go down a different path on issue-10.
Aleecia McDonald, 26 Jan 2012, 11:17:21Display change log