ISSUE-159: How do we allow sites that mash-in ad-supported content to maintain their own 'trusted third parties'?
mashing
How do we allow sites that mash-in ad-supported content to maintain their own 'trusted third parties'?
- State:
- POSTPONED
- Product:
- Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)
- Raised by:
- David Singer
- Opened on:
- 2012-08-09
- Description:
- Imagine a site A that is (a) ad-supported and (b) mashes in content from site X that is, in turn, ad-supported. Say in turn that the user has granted a site-specific exception for X, but not A. When visiting A, X's third parties will not, under today's model, get their DNT:0.
The problem is that it looks, on the face of it, impossible to distinguish iFrames that represent mashed content and that should start a new context, from iFrames that are being used to embed and maybe 'sandbox' ads, and that should not.
Proposal: we punt on this corner case for the first version of the spec. - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: TPWG agenda for Wednesday, January 16 (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-01-30)
- Re: TPWG agenda for Wednesday, January 16 (from singer@apple.com on 2013-01-29)
- Re: Towards closing the remaining issues in the TPE specification (from singer@apple.com on 2012-10-03)
- Re: Towards closing the remaining issues in the TPE specification (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-10-02)
- Towards closing the remaining issues in the TPE specification (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2012-10-01)
- Agenda for August 15, 2012 call (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2012-08-13)
- tracking-ISSUE-159 (mashing): How do we allow sites that mash-in add-supported content to maintain their own 'trusted third parties'? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-08-09)
Related notes:
fix typo in title
Roy Fielding, 29 Sep 2012, 06:35:05We suggest to tackle this complex issue not in our first version. In future releases, we may revisit this issue.
Matthias Schunter, 12 Feb 2013, 17:40:52Display change log