Warning:
This wiki has been archived and is now read-only.
Meetings:Telecon2012.11.21
From RDF Working Group Wiki
Wednesdays at 11am US Eastern time for 75 minutes 17:00 Paris/Berlin/A'dam; 16:00 London) Telephone US: +1.617.761.6200 SIP: zakim@voip.w3.org Zakim code: 73394 IRC channel: #rdf-wg on irc.w3.org on port 6665 Zakim instructions: http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html RRSAgent instructions: http://www.w3.org/2002/03/RRSAgent Scribe list: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Scribes
Contents
Admin
- Chair: David Wood
- Scribe: Yves Raimond
- Alternate: Zhe Wu
Minutes of last meeting
PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 7 Nov telecon:
http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2012-11-07
Review of action items
- http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/pendingreview
- http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/open
RDF Concepts
- Update from Sandro on ACTION-82 (.well-known registration) ACTION-82
- Update from Dave on ACTION-193 (Migration Guide ED) ACTION-193
- Check for consensus on ISSUE-104 (Too many Notes)
- PROPOSAL: Delete four informative Notes from Concepts as described in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Nov/0131.html
- Check for consensus on ISSUE-110 (Term for g-box)
- PROPOSAL 1: Informally call g-boxes “RDF sources” in Concepts
- PROPOSAL 2: Keep the informal term “g-box” in Concepts
- Assign reviewers
Turtle LC
- Review of status comments
- Test suite
JSON-LD
- Status report
Review of issue list
Open issues:
- ISSUE-107 (Blank Nodes definition) has turned out to be more “interesting” than expected, so I propose to move it towards the end of the agenda as:
PROPOSAL: Change RDF Concepts section 3.4 and 3.5 with updated text proposed on http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/User:Rcygania2/B-Scopes
- For ISSUE-109 (Consequence of ill-typed literals) I think we can state a concrete proposal to drive discussion:
PROPOSAL: Graphs containing ill-typed literals are inconsistent in all entailment regimes that reference a datatype map.
- New actions to tackle issues?
- Planning