Warning:
This wiki has been archived and is now read-only.
Meetings:Telecon2011.07.20
Contents
Agenda RDF-WG telecon 20 July 2011
Wednesdays at 11am US Eastern time for 75 minutes 17:00 Paris/Berlin/A'dam; 16:00 London) Telephone US: +1.617.761.6200 SIP: zakim@voip.w3.org UK: +44.203.318.0479 FR: +33.4.26.46.79.03 Zakim code: 73394 IRC channel: #rdf-wg on irc.w3.org on port 6665 Zakim instructions: http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html RRSAgent instructions: http://www.w3.org/2002/03/RRSAgent Scribe list: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Scribes
Admin
- Chair: Guus Schreiber
- Scribe: Axel Polleres
- Alternate: Pierre-Antoine Champin
PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 6 July telecon:
http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2011-07-06
Action item review:
http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/pendingreview http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/open
Next telecon: 3 August
Turtle Editors Draft
Transition request has been made:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Jul/0067.html
Current Turtle issues:
http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/products/3
Graph terminology
Thread on graph terminology:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Jul/0014.html
- g-snap: "RDF graph"
- g-box: "RDF graph resource"?
- g-text: <no name>? "RDF graph serialization/representation"?
Relevant issues:
ISSUE-14 What is a named graph and what should we call it?
ISSUE-38 graph-vocabulary: What new vocabulary should be added to RDF to talk about graphs?
ISSUE-29 default-graph: Do we support SPARQL's notion of "default graph"?
ISSUE-30 sparql datasets: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
ISSUE-12 language-tagged literals
See proposal plus thread:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Jul/0048.html
Time permitting
Graph concepts & semantics
ISSUE-15 What is the relationship between the IRI and the triples in a dataset/quad-syntax/etc
- Status of Action-65 http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/users/21507
- Amendment of Pierre-Antoine: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Jun/0153.html
Progress?
Other action under this heading (with proposed discussion order):
ISSUE-32 naming g-snaps: Can we identify both g-boxes and g-snaps?
ISSUE-33 subgraphs: Do we provide a way to refer to sub-graphs and/or individual triples?
ISSUE-35 rdf:Graph?: Should there be an rdf:Graph construct, or something like that?
ISSUE-17 Graph merge: How are RDF datasets to be merged?
ISSUE-21 Shared Node-IDs: Can Node-IDs be shared between parts of a quad/multigraph format?
ISSUE-22 empty-graphs: Does multigraph syntax need to support empty graphs?
ISSUE-31 multigraph syntax needed: Do we produce a standard (REC) syntax for conveying multiple graphs?
SPARQL coordination
SPARQL Last Call: see message from Lee: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011May/0192.html
Review of Pierre-Antoine: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Jun/0154.html