ISSUE-87: Revisit RDF 2004 datatypes that have proven troublesome in OWL and RIF
Revisit 2004 types
Revisit RDF 2004 datatypes that have proven troublesome in OWL and RIF
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Raised by:
- Richard Cyganiak
- Opened on:
- 2012-05-02
- Description:
- Some RDF datatypes included in RDF 2004, such as xsd:gYear, have proven troublesome in RIF and OWL due to not being well-behaved w.r.t. ordering.
Revisit them to decide if anything is to be done about it. - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2012-05-16)
- Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2012-05-15)
- Re: Proposal to resolve two XSD datatype issues (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2012-05-10)
- Re: Proposal to resolve two XSD datatype issues (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2012-05-10)
- Re: Proposal to resolve two XSD datatype issues (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2012-05-10)
- Re: Proposal to resolve two XSD datatype issues (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-05-10)
- Proposal to resolve two XSD datatype issues (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2012-05-10)
- Re: Proposal to resolve two XSD datatype issues (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2012-05-09)
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-87 (Revisit 2004 types): Revisit RDF 2004 datatypes that have proven troublesome in OWL and RIF (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-05-02)
- RDF-ISSUE-87 (Revisit 2004 types): Revisit RDF 2004 datatypes that have proven troublesome in OWL and RIF (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-05-02)
Related notes:
From http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2012-05-16
RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-87 without further action as per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012May/0221.html
Display change log