ISSUE-60: Revisit "Defining the interpretation of fragment identifiers in RDF embedded in other document formats"
revisit-rdf-fragids-in-embedded-rdf
Revisit "Defining the interpretation of fragment identifiers in RDF embedded in other document formats"
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Cleanup tasks
- Raised by:
- David Wood
- Opened on:
- 2011-05-03
- Description:
- See http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-fragids-in-embedded-rdf
rdf-fragids-in-embedded-rdf: Defining the interpretation of fragment
identifiers in RDF embedded in other document formats.
Propose to resolve CONTINUE (editorial) - the specs should probably mention this
somewhere.
Richard proposes to CLOSE as duplicate with:
http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/37
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- [ALL] Minor Issues with Minutes from 2011-06-08 (from david@3roundstones.com on 2011-06-13)
- RDF-ISSUE-60 (revisit-rdf-fragids-in-embedded-rdf): Revisit 'Defining the interpretation of fragment identifiers in RDF embedded in other document formats' [Cleanup tasks] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-05-03)
Related notes:
See: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/60
cygri: things like RDFa make this question more important, so this should be
considered
See instead: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/37
William Waites, 8 Jun 2011, 15:43:24Resolved to CLOSE during 8 June 2011 telecon because we consider it a duplication of this WG's ISSUE-37:
http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/37
Display change log
