ISSUE-37: Handling of fragment identifiers in RDF embedded in other document formats

fragids-in-embedded-rdf

Handling of fragment identifiers in RDF embedded in other document formats

State:

CLOSED

Product:

Cleanup tasks

Raised by:

Richard Cyganiak

Opened on:

2011-04-15

Description:

This is a leftover from the previous RDF working group:
http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-fragids-in-embedded-rdf
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003OctDec/0143.html

Specifications for languages that embed RDF in them should defer to the RDF specs for the interpretation of fragment identifiers defined in embedded RDF.

Consider say, an SVG document, that contains embedded RDF that defines a fragment identifier. The SVG specification should say that the fragment identifier should be treated as an RDF fragment identifier. It has been suggested that this may be a general issue for the TAG about the treatment of fragment identifiers when one language is embedded in another.

This is getting more interesting in light of the existence of RDFa.

It is expected that this WG will add text to one of its documents to state what we expect, but we do not expect it to lead o any other change to the RDF specs.

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Re: Proposal: Strike section “Fragment Identifiers” from RDF Concepts (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2011-11-10)
2. Re: Proposal: Strike section “Fragment Identifiers” from RDF Concepts (from jeremy@topquadrant.com on 2011-11-09)
3. Proposal: Strike section “Fragment Identifiers” from RDF Concepts (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2011-11-09)
4. RDF-ISSUE-69 (fragments): Handling of fragment identifiers in RDF Concepts (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-07-21)
5. [ALL] Minor Issues with Minutes from 2011-06-08 (from david@3roundstones.com on 2011-06-13)
6. RDF-ISSUE-60 (revisit-rdf-fragids-in-embedded-rdf): Revisit 'Defining the interpretation of fragment identifiers in RDF embedded in other document formats' [Cleanup tasks] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-05-03)
7. Re: first cut at proposing closure for the RDFCore legacy issue list (from dpw@talis.com on 2011-04-15)
8. Re: first cut at proposing closure for the RDFCore legacy issue list (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2011-04-15)
9. RDF-ISSUE-37 (fragids-in-embedded-rdf): Handling of fragment identifiers in RDF embedded in other document formats (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-04-15)

Related notes:

Display change log