ISSUE-35: Should there be an rdf:Graph construct, or something like that?

Should there be an rdf:Graph construct, or something like that?

State:
CLOSED
Product:
RDF Graphs
Raised by:
Opened on:
2011-04-14
Description:
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. RDF-ISSUE-167 (stronger dataset semantics): Stronger semantics of RDF Datasets? [RDF Semantics] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-10-23)
  2. Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (ISSUE-142) (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2013-10-14)
  3. Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (ISSUE-142) (from jjc@syapse.com on 2013-10-14)
  4. Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (ISSUE-142) (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2013-10-11)
  5. Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (from guus.schreiber@vu.nl on 2013-10-11)
  6. Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (from sandro@w3.org on 2013-10-11)
  7. Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2013-10-10)
  8. Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (from ivan@w3.org on 2013-10-10)
  9. Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2013-10-09)
  10. Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (from sandro@w3.org on 2013-10-09)
  11. status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2013-10-09)
  12. RDF-ISSUE-142: rdfs:Graph ? comment [RDF Semantics] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-09-11)
  13. Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2013-09-08)
  14. Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (from sandro@w3.org on 2013-09-07)
  15. Fwd: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (from ivan@w3.org on 2013-09-07)
  16. Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (from jjc@syapse.com on 2013-09-06)
  17. Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (from sandro@w3.org on 2013-08-21)
  18. Re: issue with today's minutes (from sandro@w3.org on 2013-08-21)
  19. issue with today's minutes (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2013-08-21)
  20. Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (from jjc@syapse.com on 2013-07-19)
  21. Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (from eric@w3.org on 2013-07-17)
  22. Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (from antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr on 2013-07-16)
  23. Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (from sandro@w3.org on 2013-07-16)
  24. Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2013-07-15)
  25. Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (from jjc@syapse.com on 2013-07-15)
  26. Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (from sandro@w3.org on 2013-07-11)
  27. rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (from jjc@syapse.com on 2013-07-11)
  28. Solve ISSUE-35 and ISSUE-38 by referring to SPARQL 1.1 Service description (from antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr on 2012-09-10)
  29. [GRAPH] RDF WG Issues Relating to the Graph TF (from david@3roundstones.com on 2011-10-10)
  30. Re: RDF-ISSUE-38 (AZ): What new vocabulary should be added to RDF to talk about graphs? [RDF Graphs] (from antoine.zimmermann@gmail.com on 2011-04-16)
  31. Re: RDF-ISSUE-38 (AZ): What new vocabulary should be added to RDF to talk about graphs? [RDF Graphs] (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2011-04-16)
  32. ISSUE-35: Should there be an rdf:Graph construct, or something like that? (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-04-14)

Related notes:

Resolution at Oct 2012 F2F:

RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-35 and ISSUE-38 saying we're not going to do these in a REC, but might something like this in a WG NOTE ←

http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2012-10-29#resolution_10

Guus Schreiber, 8 Oct 2013, 13:24:08

Display change log ATOM feed

Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>, Chair, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Staff Contacts
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 35.html,v 1.1 2014-07-09 12:18:00 carine Exp $