<trackbot> Date: 02 May 2011

<smaug_> oh, audio WG has conf calls

<smaug_> did someone from Mozilla join the group already?

<F1LT3R> Zakim: aacc is F1LT3R

<F1LT3R> scribe: F1LT3R

<MikeSmith> is 510 area code Chris?

MikeSmith: yes

<MikeSmith> OK

<MikeSmith> who else at 617 area code other than F1LT3R ?

<MikeSmith> and 630 is somebody in Illinois?

<MikeSmith> and ??P8 is somebody from Skype or GTalk other VOIP

<tmichel> Yes I am using VOIP with X-Lite

<quinnirill> I'm getting code not valid, using Ekiga SIP

<inserted> scribe: F1LT3R

chris: With regards to the web audio spec., ideally we would should be able to create a JavaScriptAudioNode that does not requires input connectioins to generate a signal.

joeb: I think we might need to make some semantic changes to the implemetation for it to make more sense to the developer.

<joeb> al you are dropping out

<tmichel> can't hear Al neither ..

<shepazu> scribenick: shepazu

<F1LT3R> Appologies, I am having technical difficulties with my phone: I will be sticking with IRC for this session.

Resolution: remove buffer size from js audio node constructor

<F1LT3R> If we remove all control of the buffer size from the audio node, is it still available to be controlled by the audio context?

<chris> F1LT3R: I don't think so

<chris> F1LT3R: but optionally we could have an attribute on the context about how "robust" the performance needs to be

<tmichel> WG participant list

<tmichel> http://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=46884&public=1&gs=1&

<tmichel> to join the Audio WG

<tmichel> http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/46884/join

<tmichel> just fill this easy and quick form ...

http://www.w3.org/2011/audio/

<tmichel> that is the WG audio page ...

<F1LT3R> Chris, that sounds like a good compromise. Perhaps fine control of buffers/latency is a feature that we should implement as part of the more advanced audio spec.

<tmichel> Thierry now scribing ...

<tmichel> Do not know what is on the agenda ...

<tmichel> Doug proposes to postpone to the next meeting

<F1LT3R> OK by me.

<tmichel> 1- two copies one with the current implementations and another with the new issues ...

<tmichel> It take some time to make the implementation compatible

<tmichel> What we have decided to agree on will be the W3C spec.

<tmichel> and mention also what the implementation do.

<tmichel> People need some kind of information about what the implementation does.

<tmichel> Doug proposes to add a note in the document to say what the implementation does.

<tmichel> Jo will give some more time to clean this implementation issue list.

http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/spec-conventions.html#notes

<tmichel> Doug, it shoul probably be a Note or Warning

<tmichel> Jo will kept to old Chrome API to be depreacated.

This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135  of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: i/With regards to/scribe: F1LT3R
Found Scribe: F1LT3R
Inferring ScribeNick: F1LT3R
WARNING: No scribe lines found matching previous ScribeNick pattern: <shepazu> ...
Found Scribe: F1LT3R
Inferring ScribeNick: F1LT3R
Found ScribeNick: shepazu
ScribeNicks: shepazu, F1LT3R

WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found.


WARNING: No "Present: ... " found!
Possibly Present: Doug_Schepers F1LT3R MikeSmith P21 P8 aaaa aabb aacc aadd aaee aaff audio chris dpenkler inserted joeb joined quinnirill scribenick shepazu smaug_ tmichel trackbot
You can indicate people for the Present list like this:
        <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary
        <dbooth> Present+ amy

Found Date: 02 May 2011
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2011/05/02-audio-minutes.html
People with action items: 

WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found!  
Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>.

Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of 
new discussion topics or agenda items, such as:
<dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report