IRC log of audio on 2011-05-02

Timestamps are in UTC.

15:57:23 [RRSAgent]
RRSAgent has joined #audio
15:57:23 [RRSAgent]
logging to
15:57:25 [trackbot]
RRSAgent, make logs world
15:57:25 [Zakim]
Zakim has joined #audio
15:57:27 [trackbot]
Zakim, this will be AUDIO
15:57:27 [Zakim]
ok, trackbot, I see RWC_(Audio WG)12:00PM already started
15:57:28 [trackbot]
Meeting: Audio Incubator Group Teleconference
15:57:29 [trackbot]
Date: 02 May 2011
15:58:28 [Zakim]
+ +1.510.334.aaaa
15:59:26 [Zakim]
+ +1.617.869.aabb
15:59:39 [Zakim]
- +1.617.869.aabb
15:59:42 [smaug_]
oh, audio WG has conf calls
16:00:10 [Zakim]
+ +1.617.869.aacc
16:00:16 [smaug_]
did someone from Mozilla join the group already?
16:00:39 [F1LT3R]
Zakim: aacc is F1LT3R
16:00:49 [F1LT3R]
Zakim, aacc is F1LT3R
16:00:49 [Zakim]
+F1LT3R; got it
16:00:51 [Zakim]
+ +1.617.714.aadd
16:01:14 [quinnirill]
quinnirill has joined #audio
16:04:20 [Zakim]
16:05:15 [Zakim]
16:05:15 [MikeSmith]
Zakim, who's on the phone?
16:05:16 [Zakim]
On the phone I see ??P8, +1.510.334.aaaa, +1.617.714.aadd, F1LT3R
16:05:38 [F1LT3R]
scribe: F1LT3R
16:05:47 [Zakim]
+ +1.630.667.aaee
16:05:58 [MikeSmith]
is 510 area code Chris?
16:06:18 [F1LT3R]
MikeSmith: yes
16:06:23 [MikeSmith]
16:06:33 [MikeSmith]
Zakim, aaaa is chris
16:06:33 [Zakim]
+chris; got it
16:06:56 [MikeSmith]
who else at 617 area code other than F1LT3R ?
16:07:46 [MikeSmith]
and 630 is somebody in Illinois?
16:07:57 [Zakim]
16:08:34 [MikeSmith]
and ??P8 is somebody from Skype or GTalk other VOIP
16:08:38 [dpenkler]
dpenkler has joined #audio
16:08:45 [joeb]
joeb has joined #audio
16:08:58 [tmichel]
Yes I am using VOIP with X-Lite
16:10:53 [quinnirill]
I'm getting code not valid, using Ekiga SIP
16:12:30 [MikeSmith]
Zakim, ??P8 is tmichel
16:12:30 [Zakim]
+tmichel; got it
16:13:40 [Zakim]
+ +
16:14:03 [dpenkler]
zakim,aaff is me
16:14:04 [Zakim]
+dpenkler; got it
16:15:02 [Zakim]
16:15:59 [quinnirill]
Zakim,??P21 is me
16:15:59 [Zakim]
+quinnirill; got it
16:15:59 [F1LT3R]
agenda+ JavaScriptAudioNode signal generation without input connections
16:17:20 [MikeSmith]
Zakim, who's on the phone?
16:17:20 [Zakim]
On the phone I see tmichel, chris, +1.617.714.aadd, F1LT3R, +1.630.667.aaee, Doug_Schepers, dpenkler, quinnirill
16:17:33 [F1LT3R]
next agendum
16:18:28 [Zakim]
16:19:44 [Zakim]
16:21:57 [F1LT3R]
chris: With regards to the web audio spec., ideally we would should be able to create a JavaScriptAudioNode that does not requires input connectioins to generate a signal.
16:22:09 [MikeSmith]
RRSAgent, make minutes
16:22:09 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate MikeSmith
16:22:27 [MikeSmith]
RRSAgent, make logs public
16:23:22 [MikeSmith]
Chair: Alistair_MacDonald
16:23:51 [MikeSmith]
i/With regards to/scribe: F1LT3R/
16:23:55 [MikeSmith]
RRSAgent, make logs public
16:24:00 [MikeSmith]
RRSAgent, make logs public
16:24:12 [MikeSmith]
RRSAgent, make minutes
16:24:12 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate MikeSmith
16:24:23 [F1LT3R]
joeb : I think we might need to make some semantic changes to the implemetation for it to make more sense to the developer.
16:26:29 [F1LT3R]
agenda+ Buffers sizes & latency perameters
16:26:36 [F1LT3R]
next agendum
16:30:55 [Zakim]
16:31:48 [Zakim]
16:31:49 [Zakim]
16:32:11 [Zakim]
16:32:56 [Zakim]
16:33:48 [Zakim]
16:35:03 [Zakim]
16:35:06 [joeb]
al you are dropping out
16:35:10 [tmichel]
can't hear Al neither ..
16:37:07 [shepazu]
scribenick: shepazu
16:37:37 [F1LT3R]
Appologies, I am having technical difficulties with my phone: I will be sticking with IRC for this session.
16:38:05 [shepazu]
Resolution: remove buffer size from js audio node constructor
16:38:51 [F1LT3R]
If we remove all control of the buffer size from the audio node, is it still available to be controlled by the audio context?
16:39:31 [chris]
F1LT3R: I don't think so
16:40:18 [chris]
F1LT3R: but optionally we could have an attribute on the context about how "robust" the performance needs to be
16:40:41 [tmichel]
WG participant list
16:40:44 [tmichel]
16:41:07 [tmichel]
to join the Audio WG
16:41:11 [tmichel]
16:41:28 [tmichel]
just fill this easy and quick form ...
16:42:49 [shepazu]
16:43:15 [tmichel]
that is the WG audio page ...
16:43:51 [F1LT3R]
Chris, that sounds like a good compromise. Perhaps fine control of buffers/latency is a feature that we should implement as part of the more advanced audio spec.
16:44:26 [tmichel]
Thierry now scribing ...
16:45:19 [tmichel]
Do not know what is on the agenda ...
16:45:32 [tmichel]
Doug proposes to postpone to the next meeting
16:46:44 [F1LT3R]
OK by me.
16:46:54 [tmichel]
1- two copies one with the current implementations and another with the new issues ...
16:47:17 [tmichel]
It take some time to make the implementation compatible
16:48:12 [tmichel]
What we have decided to agree on will be the W3C spec.
16:48:27 [tmichel]
and mention also what the implementation do.
16:49:26 [tmichel]
People need some kind of information about what the implementation does.
16:49:55 [tmichel]
Doug proposes to add a note in the document to say what the implementation does.
16:51:09 [tmichel]
Jo will give some more time to clean this implementation issue list.
16:52:03 [shepazu]
16:52:59 [tmichel]
Doug, it shoul probably be a Note or Warning
16:54:43 [tmichel]
Jo will kept to old Chrome API to be depreacated.
16:59:08 [Zakim]
17:06:58 [Zakim]
- +1.630.667.aaee
17:07:02 [Zakim]
- +1.617.714.aadd
17:07:03 [Zakim]
17:07:04 [Zakim]
17:07:04 [Zakim]
17:07:09 [MikeSmith]
RRSAgent, make minutes
17:07:09 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate MikeSmith
17:10:00 [Zakim]
17:10:01 [Zakim]
RWC_(Audio WG)12:00PM has ended
17:10:02 [Zakim]
Attendees were +1.510.334.aaaa, +1.617.869.aabb, +1.617.869.aacc, F1LT3R, +1.617.714.aadd, +1.630.667.aaee, chris, Doug_Schepers, tmichel, +, dpenkler, quinnirill
18:50:55 [MikeSmith]
MikeSmith has joined #audio