ISSUE-97: Determine if datetime should be supported in HTML5

HTML5 datetime support

Determine if datetime should be supported in HTML5

State:
CLOSED
Product:
RDFa 1.1 in HTML5
Raised by:
Manu Sporny
Opened on:
2011-06-13
Description:
Stephane Corlosquet writes:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2011Jun/0020.html

The way microdata property values are processed in HTML5 depends on what tag contains the value. For most tags, it's either the text content, or one of the usual suspects: @content, @src or @href.

There are two tags however in microdata where the property value does not come from any of the RDFa attributes. These tags are <time> and <object> where the property value comes from @datetime and @data, respectively. It is to be expected that HTML5 authors will place relevant values in these attributes, and I'm wondering how RDFa 1.1 can target these without resorting to adding a content attribute.

Let's take the example of <time> which in HTML5 can look like this:
<time itemprop="birthday" datetime="2009-05-10">May 10th 2009</time>

Does the @content attribute have to be explicitly added in the RDFa form? Is there a shorter way to turn that into RDFa than the following one?
<time property="birthday" datetime="2009-05-10" content="2009-05-10T00:00:00-00:00" datatype="xsd:dateTime">May 10th 2009</time>

How about the data attribute?
Related Actions Items:
Related emails:
  1. Re: HTML+RDFa source updated (ISSUE-97, ISSUE-144, ISSUE-146) (from ahby@aptest.com on 2013-01-05)
  2. Re: HTML+RDFa source updated (ISSUE-97, ISSUE-144, ISSUE-146) (from ivan@w3.org on 2013-01-05)
  3. Re: HTML+RDFa source updated (ISSUE-97, ISSUE-144, ISSUE-146) (from ahby@aptest.com on 2013-01-05)
  4. Re: HTML+RDFa source updated (ISSUE-97, ISSUE-144, ISSUE-146) (from ivan@w3.org on 2013-01-05)
  5. Re: HTML+RDFa source updated (ISSUE-97, ISSUE-144, ISSUE-146) (from ahby@aptest.com on 2013-01-04)
  6. Re: HTML+RDFa source updated (ISSUE-97, ISSUE-144, ISSUE-146) (from ahby@aptest.com on 2013-01-04)
  7. Re: HTML+RDFa source updated (ISSUE-97, ISSUE-144, ISSUE-146) (from gregg@greggkellogg.net on 2013-01-04)
  8. Re: HTML+RDFa source updated (ISSUE-97, ISSUE-144, ISSUE-146) (from ahby@aptest.com on 2013-01-04)
  9. Re: HTML+RDFa source updated (ISSUE-97, ISSUE-144, ISSUE-146) (from gregg@greggkellogg.net on 2013-01-04)
  10. Re: HTML+RDFa source updated (ISSUE-97, ISSUE-144, ISSUE-146) (from ivan@w3.org on 2013-01-03)
  11. Re: HTML+RDFa source updated (ISSUE-97, ISSUE-144, ISSUE-146) (from ivan@w3.org on 2013-01-03)
  12. Re: HTML+RDFa source updated (ISSUE-97, ISSUE-144, ISSUE-146) (from lindstream@gmail.com on 2013-01-03)
  13. Re: HTML+RDFa source updated (ISSUE-97, ISSUE-144, ISSUE-146) (from gregg@greggkellogg.net on 2013-01-02)
  14. Re: HTML+RDFa source updated (ISSUE-97, ISSUE-144, ISSUE-146) (from gregg@greggkellogg.net on 2013-01-02)
  15. Re: HTML+RDFa source updated (ISSUE-97, ISSUE-144, ISSUE-146) (from ivan@w3.org on 2013-01-02)
  16. Re: HTML+RDFa source updated (ISSUE-97, ISSUE-144, ISSUE-146) (from gregg@greggkellogg.net on 2013-01-01)
  17. Re: HTML+RDFa source updated (ISSUE-97, ISSUE-144, ISSUE-146) (from ivan@w3.org on 2013-01-01)
  18. Re: HTML+RDFa source updated (ISSUE-97, ISSUE-144, ISSUE-146) (from gregg@greggkellogg.net on 2013-01-01)
  19. Re: HTML+RDFa source updated (ISSUE-97, ISSUE-144, ISSUE-146) (from ivan@w3.org on 2013-01-01)
  20. HTML+RDFa source updated (ISSUE-97, ISSUE-144, ISSUE-146) (from gregg@greggkellogg.net on 2012-12-27)
  21. Re: Last call comment admin: resolution of ISSUE-97 (from scorlosquet@gmail.com on 2011-11-22)
  22. Last call comment admin: resolution of ISSUE-97 (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-11-22)
  23. Re: Agenda for telco, 2011-11-17 (from lindstream@gmail.com on 2011-11-17)
  24. Re: Agenda for telco, 2011-11-17 (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-11-17)
  25. Re: Agenda for telco, 2011-11-17 (from gregg@kellogg-assoc.com on 2011-11-16)
  26. Re: Agenda for telco, 2011-11-17 (from Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl on 2011-11-16)
  27. Re: Agenda for telco, 2011-11-17 (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-11-16)
  28. Agenda for telco, 2011-11-17 (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-11-16)
  29. Just checking out where we are with RDFa issues (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-11-15)
  30. Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-11-11)
  31. Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) (from gregg@kellogg-assoc.com on 2011-11-11)
  32. Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) (from lindstream@gmail.com on 2011-11-11)
  33. Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) (from jeni@jenitennison.com on 2011-11-11)
  34. Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-11-11)
  35. Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) (from jeni@jenitennison.com on 2011-11-11)
  36. Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) (from lindstream@gmail.com on 2011-11-11)
  37. Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-11-11)
  38. Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) (from tai@g5n.co.uk on 2011-11-11)
  39. Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) (from jeni@jenitennison.com on 2011-11-10)
  40. Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) (from felix.sasaki@fh-potsdam.de on 2011-11-10)
  41. Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-11-10)
  42. Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) (from shane@aptest.com on 2011-11-10)
  43. Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) (from lindstream@gmail.com on 2011-11-10)
  44. Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) (from felix.sasaki@fh-potsdam.de on 2011-11-10)
  45. Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-11-10)
  46. Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) (from gregg@kellogg-assoc.com on 2011-11-10)
  47. Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) (from shane@aptest.com on 2011-11-10)
  48. Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) (from gregg@kellogg-assoc.com on 2011-11-10)
  49. Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-11-10)
  50. Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) (from shane@aptest.com on 2011-11-10)
  51. Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97) (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-11-10)
  52. Re: ISSUE-97 (HTML5 datetime support): Determine if datetime should be supported in HTML5 [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] (from scorlosquet@gmail.com on 2011-06-24)
  53. Re: ISSUE-97 (HTML5 datetime support): Determine if datetime should be supported in HTML5 [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-06-13)
  54. ISSUE-97 (HTML5 datetime support): Determine if datetime should be supported in HTML5 [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-06-13)

Related notes:

Resolved:

http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2011-11-17

Ivan Herman, 17 Nov 2011, 16:13:52

Display change log ATOM feed

Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 97.html,v 1.1 2015/03/27 14:12:36 vivien Exp $