- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:01:06 +0100
- To: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Now that we have passed a significant hurdle, I gathered the current open issues on RDFa. Some of these should be doable easily, but we should try to make decision nevertheless. Note that I took the liberty to add issues 116 and 117 to reflect discussions happening at various places lately. Here is where we are: Core: - ISSUE-18 [1]: Determine how ODF will integrate RDFa 1.1 - ISSUE-116 [2]: Consider owl terms for vocab expansion Lite: - ISSUE-115 [3]: Explanation on the Fragment ID in @about may be misleading (RDFa Lite) HTML 5: - ISSUE-97 [4]: Determine if datetime should be supported in HTML5 - ISSUE-108 [5]: Refine/deprecate Link relations for the RDFa 1.1 Default Profile. - ISSUE-113 [6]: Add the value attribute of the HTML data element as a possible literal target for property - ISSUE-114 [7]: HTML5 content model for @href/@src coerces values to URLs - ISSUE-117 [8]: Consider disallowing @about on <html> Looking at the list: - 18 seems to be an old leftover, not sure what this means for today (we may just close it) - 116 has to be discussed and decided upon - 115 is an editorial small issue - 97 and 113 are pretty much along the same lines, should be decided - 108 should be discussed and decided upon - 114 is a really hard one:-( - 117 should be discussed and decided upon Ivan [1] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/18 [2] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/116 [3] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/115 [4] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/97 [5] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/108 [6] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/113 [7] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/114 ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2011 17:58:42 UTC