See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 10 June 2009
<Tina> Could someone remind me of that number again ...
<scribe> scribe: Markus
<Steven> Scribe: Markus
<ShaneM> http://htmlwg.mn.aptest.com/htmlwg/xhtml11-issues-20090525.html
Issue: 9716
<trackbot> Created ISSUE-6 - 9716 ; please complete additional details at http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/tracker/issues/6/edit .
Shane: 9716 marked as
closed
... its the same comment as Hickson made
Shane to send a reply to 9716 issuer
Subtopic: issue 480
Shane: form and image elements not having a name attribute - we discussed this in the context of 1.0. 1.1 which is based on 1.0 strict also doesnt have name on form and image.
Steven: related to 8415
MoZ: Agree, they are related
Markus: do we have a legacy reasons to maintain these in 1.1
Shane: Yes - HTML DOM creates
named entires for the based on name attribute, not id
attributes
... but perhaps this is not true in modern browsers
The comment (480) says theres a typo; that we are not correctly representing the removal; not suggesting reintroduction.
<scribe> ACTION: Steven to ask Alessio to tell us if HTML DOM still requires @name on form and image [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/06/10-xhtml-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-85 - Ask Alessio to tell us if HTML DOM still requires @name on form and image [on Steven Pemberton - due 2009-06-17].
Subtopic: Issue 489
Shane: this is fixed.
Subtopic: Issue 478
<Steven> http://htmlwg.mn.aptest.com/htmlwg/xhtml11-issues-20090525.html#ssec13
<Steven> I mean: http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2009/xhtml11-issues-20090525.html#ssec13
Shane: in MOD we call it the tables module. In XHTML 1.1 its called the table module.
Steven: editorial. Change the reference from 1.1 to MOD
Subtopic: Issue 469
<Steven> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2009/xhtml11-issues-20090525.html#ssec14
Shane: these items are corrected.
Subtopic: Issue 584
<Steven> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2009/xhtml11-issues-20090525.html#ssec15
Steven: same as 478, modify the reference from 1.1 to MOD
Subtopic: Issue 6288
<Steven> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2009/xhtml11-issues-20090525.html#ssec16
Shane: the submitter is correct that somehow XMLNAMES became informatively referenced. Fixed.
Subtopic: Issue 6933
<Steven> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2009/xhtml11-issues-20090525.html#ssec17
Shane: think all assertions are now marked as such.
Subtopic: Issue 582
<Steven> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2009/xhtml11-issues-20090525.html#ssec18
Shane: 1.0's IMPLIED base @href does not make sense.
Steven: does the submitters use
of frame references work in browsers?
... comment needs to be passed on to next version of XHTMLMOD,
we cannot change it in 1.1.
... He is right, but one could use href="" and achieve the same
effect.
Shane: @target is not in 1.1
right?
... the 2007 1.1 included @target, but was removed before
PER
Steven: but at last moment it was added to basic. At the PER transition call, we were asked to add it into 1.1 to make sure basic remains a proper subset. On the basis of that argumentation, we could add @target.
Shane: confirming that @target is in the 2007 version of the 1.1 DTD
Steven: was wrong about @target and basic, it was inputmode that was discussed
Shane: which is also not in the PER
Steven: what do we do with target?
MoZ: think its not the aim of a new edition to change, unless DTD is not in harmony with prose.
Steven: while we agree with this
change, the current edition is not about making changes to the
language, this issue will get marked as an issue for a future
version
... second issue in 582
Shane: form a reply
Subtopic: Issue 6909
<Steven> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2009/xhtml11-issues-20090525.html#ssec19
Shane: already fixed.
Subtopic: Issue 650
<Steven> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2009/xhtml11-issues-20090525.html#ssec20
Shane: already discussed in the context of 1.0
<Steven> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2009/xhtml11-issues-20090525.html#ssec8
<Steven> http://www.w3.org/2009/06/02-xhtml-minutes.html#item22
Steven: issue is on the wrong spec; to be moved to XHTMLMOD
Subtopic: Issue 651
<Steven> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2009/xhtml11-issues-20090525.html#ssec21
Editorial fix with no objections.
Steven: done with 1.0 and 1.1. Are there any issues on basic and print?
Shane: none on print.
Steven: basic spec says to send comments to www-html-editor. One comment:
<Steven> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html-editor/2009JanMar/0002.html
Shane: fixed those typos.
Steven: will go through Bjoerns
email for any additional issues.
... modulo Bjoerns latest comments, we think that we have dealt
with all issues
<ShaneM> ACTION: Shane to produce updated PER drafts and disposition of comments documents [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/06/10-xhtml-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-86 - Produce updated PER drafts and disposition of comments documents [on Shane McCarron - due 2009-06-17].
<Steven> Thanks for scribing Markus
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135 of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: mgylling Found Scribe: Markus Found Scribe: Markus Default Present: Steven, +1.763.767.aaaa, +04670602aabb, Markus, MoZ, +0468645aacc, Tina Present: Steven +1.763.767.aaaa +04670602aabb Markus MoZ +0468645aacc Tina Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xhtml2/2009Jun/0007.html WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth Found Date: 10 Jun 2009 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2009/06/10-xhtml-minutes.html People with action items: shane steven[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]